Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 165–185 | Cite as

Local Government in the 2013 Constitution of Zimbabwe: Defining the Boundaries of Local Autonomy

Article
  • 72 Downloads

Abstract

The 2013 Constitution of Zimbabwe recognises local government as the lowest tier of government in a three tier arrangement. Thus, local government, composed by urban and rural local authorities, now owes its existence directly to the Constitution and not to legislation as was the case under the previous constitutional order. The Constitution assigns to local authorities the responsibility to ‘manage’ and ‘represent’ the affairs of people in their respective areas. Every local authority is given the ‘right to govern’ its jurisdiction with ‘all’ the necessary powers to do so, including devolved powers. Thus, the Constitution recognises that, for the benefits associated with decentralisation to be realised, local authorities require a certain measure of local autonomy. The autonomy which this Constitution affords to local government is however unknown and unexplored, especially from a constitutional law point of view. In this article, we measure the degree of local autonomy guaranteed by the 2013 Constitution.

Keywords

Local government Local autonomy Constitution of Zimbabwe Decentralisation Devolution Zimbabwe 

References

  1. Bahl R (1999) Implementing rules for fiscal decentralisation. International Studies Program Working Paper 99-1. https://www.gtac.gov.za/Event_Documents/Implementation%20Rules%20For%20Fiscal%20Decentralization%20Roy%20Bahl.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2016
  2. Chakunda S (2015) Central-local government relations: implications on the autonomy and discretion of Zimbabwe’s local government. Political Sci Public Aff 3(1):1–4Google Scholar
  3. Chigwata TC (2015) Decentralization in Africa and the resilience of traditional authorities: evaluating Zimbabwe’s track record. Reg Fed Stud 25(5):439–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chigwata TC (2017) Fiscal decentralisation: constraints to revenue-raising by local government in Zimbabwe. In: Schoburgh E, Ryan R (eds) Handbook of research on subnational governance and development. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 218–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Visser J, Mapuva J (2013) Special interest councillors in Zimbabwe: reviewing law and practice in terms of the 2013 constitution. Law Democr Dev 1:157–176Google Scholar
  6. Eaton K, Schroeder L (2010) Measuring decentralisation. In: Eaton K, Connerly E, Smoke P (eds) Making decentralisation work: democracy, development and security. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, pp 167–190Google Scholar
  7. Erk J (2014) Federalism and decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa: five patterns of evolution. Reg Fed Stud 24(5):535–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fessha Y, de Visser J (2015) Drawing non-racial, non-ethnic boundaries in South Africa. In: Steytler N, Pal-Ghai Y (eds) Kenya-South Africa dialogue on devolution. Juta, Claremont, pp 81–101Google Scholar
  9. Fessha Y, Kirkby C (2008) Critical survey of subnational autonomy in African States. Publius 38(2):248–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford J (1999) Constitutional, legal, and regulatory framework for decentralisation. In: Litvack J, Seddon J (eds) Decentralisation briefing notes. World Bank Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalin W (1998) What makes decentralised government work? Lessons from Switzerland. Essays Const Law 27:1–19Google Scholar
  12. Kamete YA (2006) The return of the jettisoned: ZANU-PF’s crack at ‘re-urbanising’ in Harare. J South Afr Stud 32(2):255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muchadenyika D (2015) The inevitable devolution in Zimbabwe: from constitution-making to the future. In: De Visser J (ed) Constitution-building in Africa. Community Law Centre: University of the Western Cape, Bellville, pp 119–139Google Scholar
  14. Mushamba S (2010) The powers and functions of local government authorities. In: De Visser J, Steytler N, Machingauta N (eds) Local government reform in Zimbabwe: a policy dialogue. Community Law Centre: University of Western Cape, Bellville, pp 101–138Google Scholar
  15. Mushamba S, Bhoroma L, Chirisa I, Chaumba A (2014) The dynamics of devolution in Zimbabwe: a briefing paper on local democracy. Action Aid Denmark, HarareGoogle Scholar
  16. Panara C (2013) Conclusion: the constitution of local self-government to constitutionalism in the member states and in the EU multi-layered system of governance. In: Panara C, Varney M (eds) Local government in Europe: the ‘fourth level’ in the EU multi-layered system of governance. Routledge, London, pp 387–413Google Scholar
  17. Sims MB (2013) Conceptualising local government: local perceptions on devolution and participation in Zimbabwe. http://www.academia.edu/3536324/Conceptualising_Local_Government_Local_Perceptions_on_Devolution_and_Participation_in_Zimbabwe. Accessed 25 July 2014
  18. Tarr AG (2011) Symmetry and asymmetry in American federalism. In: Courchene JT, Allan RJ, Leuprecht C, Verrelli N (eds) The federal idea: essays in honour of Ronald Watts. McGill-Queen’s University Press, London, pp 169–187Google Scholar
  19. United Nations Human Settlement Programme (2009) International guidelines on decentralisation and access to basic services for all. UN-Habitat, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  20. World Bank (1999) World development report 1999/2000: entering the 20th Century. World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dullah Omar InstituteUniversity of the Western CapeBellvilleSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations