Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 153–174 | Cite as

Biting Intergovernmentalism: The Case for the Reinvention of Article 259 TFEU to Make It a Viable Rule of Law Enforcement Tool

Article

Abstract

In this largely instrumental thought experiment I make the case for exploring the potential of Article 259 TFEU, allowing for direct actions brought by the member states of the European Union against other member states in the context of the enforcement of the rule of law in the member states deviating from the principles of Article 2 TEU. Deploying this proposal will imply changing the established practice of (non-)application of Article 259 TFEU. Such a change, while not departing from the letter or the spirit of the law, has several advantages, from not getting the Commission directly involved in the action about the values of Article 2 TEU (should it wish to keep on staying away), to avoiding the unhelpful construction of Article 258 TFEU, which has been interpreted too cautiously and emerged as unhelpful in the context of rule of law enforcement and entirely unused in the context of the Charter of Fundamental Rights violations. Change should start somewhere and the member states, using Article 259 TFEU potentially could take the lead. In making the plea for paying more attention to horizontal enforcement of values among the member states (albeit via the Court of Justice) this contribution draws on the helpful analysis of the possibility of bundling evidence of member state disregard of the rule of law to start ‘systemic infringement actions’ before the Court of Justice. This technique, proposed by Kim Lane Scheppele, could make a difference in the world of enforcement of the promise of compliance with the very basics contained in Article 2 TEU.

Keywords

Systemic infringements Article 259 Rule of law Values Enforcement 

References

  1. Altwicker T (2015) Convention Rights as Minimum Constitutional Guarantees? The conflict between domestic constitutional law and the European Convention on Human Rights. In: von Bogdandy A, Sonnevend P (eds) Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area: theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Hart, Oxford, pp 331–350Google Scholar
  2. Araiza J-M (2015) Good neighbourliness as the limit of extra-territorial citizenship: the case of Hungary and Slovakia. In: Kochenov D, Basheska E (eds) Good neighbourliness in the European legal context. Brill-Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 114–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azopardi K (2009) Sovereignty and the stateless nation: Gibraltar in the modern legal context. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Bánkuti M, Halmai G, Scheppele KL (2012) Hungary’s illiberal turn: disabling the constitution. J Democr 23:138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baratta R (2010) Un recente procedimento di infrazione ‘interstatale’ dinanzi alla Commissione europea. Rivista di diritto internazionale XCIII:115Google Scholar
  6. Belavusau U (2013) Case C-286/12 Commission v. Hungary. CMLRev 50:1145Google Scholar
  7. Besselink LFM (2008) Case C-145/04 Spain v. United Kingdom; Case C-300/04 Eman and Sevinger; ECtHR (Third Section) 6 September 2007, Applications Nos 17173/07 and 17180/07 Oslin Benito Sevinger and Michiel Godfried Eman v. The Netherlands (Sevinger and Eman), CMLRev. 45:787Google Scholar
  8. Besselink LFM (2016) The bite, the bark and the howl: article 7 and the rule of law initiatives. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values: methods against defiance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  9. von Bogdandy A, Ioannidis M (2014) Systemic deficiency in the rule of law: what it is, what has been done, what can be done. Common Mark Law Rev 51:59Google Scholar
  10. von Bogdandy A, Antpöhler C, Dickschen J, Hentrei S, Kottmann M, Smrkolj M (2012) Reverse Solange—protecting the essence of fundamental rights against EU member states. CMLRev 49:489Google Scholar
  11. von Bogdandy A, Antpöhler C, Dickschen J, Hentrei S, Kottmann M, Smrkolj M (2015) A european response to domestic constitutional crisis: advancing the reverse-Solange doctrine. In: von Bogdandy A, Sonnevend P (eds) Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area: theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Hart, Oxford, pp 235–256Google Scholar
  12. von Bogdandy A, Antpöller C, Ioannidis M (2016) Enforcing European values. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  13. Broberg M (2016) Private enforcement through preliminary ruling procedure. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values: methods against defiance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  14. Browning B (2010) Georgia, Russia and the crisis of the Council of Europe: inter-state applications, individual complaints, and the future of the Strasbourg model of human rights litigation. In: Green J, Waters C (eds) Conflict in the Caucasus: implications for international legal order. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 114–135Google Scholar
  15. Bugarič B (2016) Protecting democracy inside the EU: on article 7 TEU and the Hungarian turn to authoritarianism. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing the rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  16. Canor I (2013) My brother’s keeper? horizontal Solange: ‘an ever closer distrust among the peoples of Europe’. CMLRev 50:384Google Scholar
  17. Closa C (2016a) Reinforcing EU monitoring of the rule of law: normative arguments, institutional proposals and the procedural limitations. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  18. Closa C (2016b) Law enforcement by regional organisations. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) Enforcement of EU law and values: methods against defiance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  19. Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) (2016) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  20. Closa C, Kochenov D, Weiler JHH (2014) Reinforcing the rule of law oversight in the European Union. RSCAS Working Paper (EUI Florence)Google Scholar
  21. Craig P, de Búrca G (2015) EU law: texts, cases materials, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 431–453Google Scholar
  22. Cremona M (ed) (2012) Compliance and the enforcement of EU law. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Croon-Gestefeld J (2016) Reverse Solange—Union citizenship as a detour on the route to European rights protection against national infringements. In: Kochenov D (ed) EU citizenship and federalism: the role of rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  24. Editorial Comments (2015) Safeguarding EU values in the member states—is something finally happening? CMLRev 52:619Google Scholar
  25. Eeckhout P (2002) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the federal question. CMLRev 39:945Google Scholar
  26. Fabbrini F (2016) The political side of EU citizenship in the context of EU federalism. In: Kochenov D (ed) EU citizenship and federalism: the role of rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  27. Gormley LW (2005) Judicial review: advice for the deaf? Fordham Int Law J 29:655Google Scholar
  28. Gormley LW (2016) Infringement procedures. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values: methods against defiance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  29. Hillion C (2016) Overseeing the rule of law in the EU: legal mandate and means. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing the rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  30. Hirsch Ballin E (2016) Mutual trust: the virtue of reciprocity strengthening the acceptance of the rule of law through peer review. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  31. Hoffmeister F (2015) Enforcing the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in member states: how far are Rome, Budapest and Bucharest from Brussels? In: von Bogdandy A, Sonnevend P (eds) Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area: theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Hart, Oxford, pp 195–234Google Scholar
  32. Jack B (2013) Article 260(2) TFEU: an effective judicial procedure for the enforcement of judgments? ELJ 19:420Google Scholar
  33. Jakab A (2016) The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as the most promising way of enforcing the rule of law against EU member states. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  34. Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) (2016) The enforcement of EU law and values: methods against defiance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  35. Khachaturyan A (2015) Applying the principle of good neighbourliness in EU law: the case of Gibraltar. In: Kochenov D, Basheska E (eds) Good neighbourliness in the European legal context. Brill-Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 160–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. King T (2000) Ensuring human rights review of intergovernmental acts in Europe. ELRev 25:79Google Scholar
  37. Klabbers J (1999) On babies, bathwater and the three musketeers, or the beginning of the end of European integration. In: Heiskanen V, Kulovesi K (eds) Function and future of European law. University of Helsinki, Helsinki, pp 275–281Google Scholar
  38. Klamert M (2014) The duty of loyalty in EU Law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kochenov D (2008) EU enlargement and the failure of conditionality. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  40. Kochenov D (2011) Double nationality in the EU: an argument for tolerance. ELJ 17:323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kochenov D (2012) Member state nationalities and the internal market: illusions and reality. In: Nic Shuibhne N, Gormley LW (eds) From single market to economic union: essays in memory of John A. Usher. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 241–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kochenov D (2014) On policing Article 2 TEU Compliance—reverse Solange and systemic infringements analyzed. Polish Yearb Int Law XXXIII:145Google Scholar
  43. Kochenov D (2015a) EU law without the rule of law. Is the veneration of autonomy worth it? Yearbook of European Law 34:1Google Scholar
  44. Kochenov D (2015b) Self-constitution through unenforceable promises. In: Přibáň J (ed) Self-constitution of Europe. Ashgate, Farnham (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  45. Kochenov D (2015c) The internal aspects of good neighbourliness in the EU: loyalty and values. In: Kochenov D, Basheska E (eds) Good neighbourliness in the European legal context. Brill-Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 57–78Google Scholar
  46. Kochenov D (ed) (2016) EU citizenship and federalism: the role of rights. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Kochenov D, Pech L (2015) Monitoring and enforcement of the rule of law in the European Union: rhetoric and reality. Eur Const Law Rev 11:512–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lachmayer K (2016) Questioning the basic values—Hungary and Jörg Haider. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  49. Lardy H (1997) Citizenship and the Right to Vote. OJLS 17(1):75, 97–98Google Scholar
  50. Łazowski A (2013) Decoding a legal enigma: the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and infringement proceedings. ERA Forum 14:573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leckie S (1988) The inter-state complaint procedure in international human rights law: hopeful prospects or wishful thinking? HRQ 10(249):271–276Google Scholar
  52. Lenaerts K, Maselis I, Gutman K (2013) EU Procedural law (Nowak JT (ed)). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 159–213Google Scholar
  53. Maresceau M (2006) Quelques réflexions sur l’application des principes fondamentaux dans la stratégie d’adhésion de l’UE. In: Raux J (2006) Le droit de l’Union européenne en principes: Liber amicorum en l’honneur de Jean Raux. LGDJ, Paris, p 69Google Scholar
  54. Materne T (2012) La procedure en manquement d’État: Guide à la lumière de la jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne. Larcier, ParisGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller J-W (2013) Safeguarding Democracy inside the EU: Brussels and the Future of Liberal Order. Working Paper No. 3, Transatlantic Academy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  56. Müller J-W (2014) The EU as a militant democracy. Rev Estud Polít 165:141Google Scholar
  57. Müller J-W (2015) Should the European Union protect democracy and the rule of law in its member states. ELJ 21:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nergelius J (2015) The role of the Venice commission in maintaining the rule of law. In: von Bogdandy A, Sonnevend P (eds) Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area: theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Hart, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  59. Palombella G (2016) Beyond legality—before democracy: rule of law caveats in a two-level system. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  60. Phelan W (2014) Supremacy, direct effect, and dairy products in the early history of European Law. IIIS Discussion Paper No. 455Google Scholar
  61. Piris J-C (2010) The Lisbon treaty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polyák G (2015) Context, rules and praxis of the new Hungarian media laws: how does the media law affect the structure and functioning of publicity? In: von Bogdandy A, Sonnevend P (eds) constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area: theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Hart, Oxford, pp 125–152Google Scholar
  63. Prete L, Smulders B (2010) The coming of age of infringement proceedings. CMLRev 47:9Google Scholar
  64. Rossi LS (2013) Case C-364/10 Hungary v. Slovakia. CMLRev 50:1451Google Scholar
  65. Sadurski W (2010) Adding bite to a bark: the story of article 7, EU enlargement, and Jörg Haider. Columbia J Eur Law 16:385Google Scholar
  66. Saydé A (2014) Abuse of EU law and regulation of the internal market. Hart, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  67. Scheppele KL (2014) Constitutional coups and judicial review: how transnational institutions can strengthen peak courts at times of crisis (with special reference to Hungary) 23 Transnatl Contemp Probl 51Google Scholar
  68. Scheppele KL (2016) Enforcing the basic principles of EU law through systemic infringement actions. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  69. Schütze R (2009) From dual to cooperative federalism. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. de Schutter O, L’Hoest O (2000) La cour européenne des droits de l’homme juge du droit communautaire: Gibraltar, l’Union européenne, et la Convention européenne des Droits de l’Homme. Cahiers de droit européen 36:141Google Scholar
  71. Smith M (2010) Inter-institutional dialogue and the establishment of enforcement norms: a decade of financial penalties under article 228 EC (now article 260 TFEU). Eur Public Law 16:547Google Scholar
  72. Smith M (2015) The evolution of infringement and sanction procedures. Of pilots, diversions, collisions, and circling. In: Arnull A, Chalmers D (eds) The Oxford handbook of European law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 350–375Google Scholar
  73. Sólyom L (2015) The rise and decline of constitutional culture in Hungary. In: von Bogdandy A, Sonnevend P (eds) Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area: theory, law and politics in Hungary and Romania. Hart, Oxford, pp 5–32Google Scholar
  74. Spiro P (2010) Dual citizenship as a human right. I-CON 8:111Google Scholar
  75. Toggenburg GN (2001) La crisi austriaca: delicate equilibrismi sospesi tra molte dimensioni. Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2001:735Google Scholar
  76. Toggenburg GN, Grimheden J (2016) The rule of law and the role of fundamental rights: seven practical pointers. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  77. Tuori K (2016) From Copenhagen to Venice. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  78. Uitz R (2015) Can you tell when and illiberal democracy is in the making? An appeal to comparative constitutional scholarship from Hungary. I-CON 13:279Google Scholar
  79. Weiler JHH (2016) Epilogue: living in a glass house: Europe, democracy, and the rule of law. In: Closa C, Kochenov D (eds) Reinforcing rule of law oversight in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (forthcoming) Google Scholar
  80. Wennerås P (2012) Sanctions against member states under article 260 TFEU: alive, but not kicking? CMLRev 49:145Google Scholar
  81. Wennerås P (2016) Making effective use of article 260. In: Jakab A, Kochenov D (eds) The enforcement of EU law and values. Oxford University Press, Oxford (forthcoming) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© T.M.C. Asser Press 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Visiting Professor and Martin and Kathleen Crane Fellow in Law and Public AffairsWoodrow Wilson School, Princeton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Visiting ProfessorCollege of EuropeNatolinPoland
  3. 3.Professor of EU Constitutional LawUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations