Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental Investigation of Inner Bearing Strength of the Concrete Filled GFRP Box Sections with Different Contact Mechanisms

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The characteristics of the interface bearing strength for the concrete filled GFRP box sections was studied conducting the experimental push-out tests. Hallow pultruded 125 mm long square GFRP box sleeves were cut from the pultruded GFRP sections, and naturally bonded, epoxy bonded, granular aggregate bonded surface treatments and mechanical connections were implemented on the specimens before concrete placement. The experimental results showed that the initial fracture strength of the naturally bonded specimen was increased from 0.28 MPa to 1.36 MPa with the epoxy bonded surface treatment. On the other hand, granular aggregate bonding surface treatment provided full composite action resulting confinement rupture of the GFRP boxes. Proper surface preparation allowed to distribute interface shear stresses while increasing the bearing capacity and did not cause localized bearing stresses as observed with presence of mechanical holes. Finally, confined cohesive zone material model (CCZM) was proposed and implemented in finite element models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deskovic N, Triantafillou TC, Meier U (1995) Innovative design of FRP combined with concrete: short-term behavior. J Struct Eng 121:1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1069)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-saadi AU, Aravinthan T, Lokuge W (2018) Structural applications of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP) composite tubes: A review of columns members. Compos Struct 204:513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Correia JR, Branco FA, Ferreira JG (2009) Flexural behaviour of multi-span GFRP-concrete hybrid beams. Eng Struct 31:1369–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fam A, Rizkalla S (2002) Flexural behavior of concrete-filled fiber-reinforced polymer circular tubes. J Compos Constr 6:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(123)

  5. Correia JR, Branco FA, Ferreira JG (2007) Flexural behaviour of GFRP–concrete hybrid beams with interconnection slip. Compos Struct 77:66–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koaik A, Bel S, Jurkiewiez B (2017) Experimental tests and analytical model of concrete-GFRP hybrid beams under flexure. Compos Struct 180:192–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.07.059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nguyen H, Mutsuyoshi H, Zatar W (2014) Push-out tests for shear connections between UHPFRC slabs and FRP girder. Compos Struct 118:528–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo Z, Zhu Y, Chen Y, Zhao Y (2021) Test on residual ultimate strength of pultruded concrete-filled GFRP tubular short columns after lateral impact. Compos Struct 260:113520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liao WC, Perceka W, Tseng LW, Nguyen DT (2021) Cyclic behavior of high-strength fiber-reinforced concrete columns under high axial loading level. ACI Struct J 118:103–116. https://doi.org/10.14359/51733004

  10. Jalalpour M, Alkhrdaji T (2022) Backbone curves of FRP confined concrete columns for nonlinear analysis Cice – 10th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. Springer International Publishing. pp 1254–1265

  11. Wright HD (1995) Local stability of filled and encased steel sections. J Struct Eng 121:1382–1388. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:10(1382)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Muttashar M, Manalo A, Karunasena W, Lokuge W (2017) Flexural behaviour of multi-celled GFRP composite beams with concrete infill: Experiment and theoretical analysis. Compos Struct 159:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen F, Teng J (2001) Anchorage strength models for FRP and steel plates bonded to concrete. J Struct Eng 127:784–791. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kabir MI, Samali B, Shrestha R (2017) Pull-out strengths of GFRP-concrete bond exposed to applied environmental conditions. Int J Concr Struct Mater 11:69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0173-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luo M, Li C, Hei W, Song G (2016) Concrete infill monitoring in concrete-filled FRP tubes using a PZT-based ultrasonic time-of-flight method. Sensors (Basel) 16:2083. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16122083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L, Zheng Y, Hu S, Yang J, Xia L (2020) Identification of bond-slip behavior of GFRP-ECC using smart aggregate transducers. Front Mater 7:165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Okeil AM, Ulger T, Babaizadeh H (2015) Effect of adhesive type on strengthening-by-stiffening for shear-deficient thin-walled steel structures. Int J Adhes Adhes 58:80–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kantarci M, Maras M, Ayaz MM (2022) Experimental performance of RC beams strengthened with aluminum honeycomb sandwich composites and CFRP U-Jackets. Exp. Tech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00589-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. AISC 360 (2016) Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction

  20. Yuan JS, Hadi MNS (2018) Friction coefficient between FRP pultruded profiles and concrete. Mat Struct 51:120. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1250-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lloyd N, Rangan B (2010) Geopolymer concrete with fly ash. Second Int. Conf. Sustain. Constr. Mater Technol 3

  22. ACI Committee 318 (2008) Building code requirements for structural concrete. Farmington Hills, MI 

  23. Arias JPM, Vazquez A, Escobar MM (2012) Use of sand coating to improve bonding between GFRP bars and concrete. J Compos Mater 46:2271–2278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311431994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aydın F, Sarıbıyık M (2013) Investigation of flexural behaviors of hybrid beams formed with GFRP box section and concrete. Constr Build Mater 41:563–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ANSYS (2015) APDL Mechanical, Release 15, Help System, Material Reference, ANSYS, Inc

  26. Sørensen BF (2002) Cohesive law and notch sensitivity of adhesive joints. Acta Mater 50:1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00404-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ji G, Ouyang Z, Li G (2012) On the interfacial constitutive laws of mixed mode fracture with various adhesive thicknesses. Mech Mater 47:24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2012.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bazli M, Zhao X, Raman S, Bai RK, Al-Saadi Y (2020) Bond performance between FRP tubes and seawater sea sand concrete after exposure to seawater condition. Constr Build Mater 265:120342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Bazli M, Zhao X, Bai Y, Singh Raman RK, Al-Saadi S (2019) Bond-slip behaviour between FRP tubes and seawater sea sand concrete. Eng Struct 197:109421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. El-Tahan M, Hassanein A, Megid WA, Galal K (2022) Evaluation of reinforced concrete T-beams retrofitted in shear with mechanically anchored dry carbon fiber sheets. Exp Tech 46:647–660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00497-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nhut PV, Yoresta FS, Kitane Y, Hashimoto K, Matsumoto Y (2022) On the strengthening of pultruded GFRP connections using glass fiber sheets: A study on the influence of bolt diameter. Appl Compos Mater 29:651–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-021-09972-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The donation of the materials from MITAS Composites and SAYILI Premix Concrete firms are acknowledged. The author thanks to the laboratory personal of Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University for helping the specimen preparations. The results and findings are only the author`s independent work and does not reflect the opinion of other parties.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Ülger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ülger, T. Experimental Investigation of Inner Bearing Strength of the Concrete Filled GFRP Box Sections with Different Contact Mechanisms. Exp Tech 47, 895–906 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00603-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00603-3

Navigation