Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and Computational Analysis of Elastic Modulus of 3D Printed Parts Using Impulse Excitation Technique (IET)

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF), also known as fused deposition modeling, is an additive manufacturing (AM) process that has gained interest from industry in a wide range of applications. In this study, the elastic modulus for 3D printed PLA beam samples, per ASTM E1876-15 and E756-05 is determined. The Impulse Excitation Technique (IET) is proposed as an inverse identification and a non-destructive testing method (NDT) to characterize the Young’s modulus of AM materials. Beam samples with three different build orientations are manufactured using the FFF method. The non-contact, laser-based vibration measurement method is used to determine the fundamental flexural frequency of cantilever beam samples. Tensile coupons, per ASTM D638-14 Type I, with three different build orientations, are also 3D printed, using the same manufacturing process and design parameters to validate the results obtained from the IET testing technique. The frequency results are then used to evaluate the beam samples’ Young’s modulus. The elastic modulus values obtained from the IET for all build orientations are found to be in close agreement with those obtained through tensile testing, with an error range of 2.0% to 5.1%. The IET is proved to be a rapid, accurate, and non-destructive process for evaluating Young’s modulus of 3D printed parts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Ning F, Cong W, Hu Y (2015) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites using fused deposition modeling. Compos Part B 80:369–378

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Papon EA, Haque A (2018) Tensile properties, void contents, dispersion and fracture behaviour of 3D printed carbon nanofiber reinforced composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 37(6):381–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Popescu D, Zapciu A, Amza C, Baciu F, Marinescu R (2018) FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: a review. Polym Test 69:157–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fayazbakhsh K, Movahedi M, Kalman J (2019) The impact of defects on tensile properties of 3D printed parts manufactured by fused filament fabrication. Mater Today Commun 18:140–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ridley-Ellis D, Libeau M, Mignerat D (2018) Impulse excitation measurement of small changes in elastic moduli and damping using R. Int Wood Prod J 9:74–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paolino DS, Geng H, Scattina A, Tridello A, Cavatorta MP, Belingardi G (2017) Damaged composite laminates: assessment of residual Young's modulus through the impulse excitation technique. Compos Part B 128:76–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guan C, Zhang H, Hunt JF, Yan H (2016) Determining shear modulus of thin wood composite materials using a cantilever beam vibration method. Constr Build Mater 121:285–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prashant SW, Chougule VN, Mitra AC (2015) Investigation on modal parameters of rectangular cantilever beam using experimental modal analysis. Mater Today: Proc 2:2121–2130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Slim MF, Alhussein A, Billard A, Sanchette F, François M (2017) On the determination of Young's modulus of thin films with impulse excitation technique. J Mater Res 32:497–511

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun W, Wang Z, Yan X, Zhu M (2018) Inverse identification of the frequency-dependent mechanical parameters of viscoelastic materials based on the measured FRFs. Mech Syst Signal Process 98:816–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song W, Zhong Y, Xiang J (2017) Mechanical parameters identification for laminated composites based on the impulse excitation technique. Compos Struct 162:255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boursier Niutta C, Tridello A, Belingardi G, Paolino DS (2021) Nondestructive determination of local material properties of laminated composites with the impulse excitation technique. Compos Struct 262:113607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boursier Niutta C (2021) Enhancement of a new methodology based on the impulse excitation technique for the nondestructive determination of local material properties in composite laminates. MDPI Appl Sci 11(1):101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ASTM E1876-15 Standard (2015) Test method for dynamic Young’s Modulus, shear Modulus, and Poisson’s ratio by impulse excitation of vibration. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/10.1520/E1876-15

    Google Scholar 

  15. ASTM E756-05 Standard (2017) Test method for measuring vibration-damping properties of materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA https://doi-org.ezproxy.lib.ryerson.ca/10.1520/E0756-05R17

    Google Scholar 

  16. Banerjee JR, Ewen NJ (2007) Dynamic stiffness formulation using Timoshenko theory for free vibration of rotating beams. 48th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures. Struct Dyn Mater Conf. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-2277

  17. Hashemi SM, Richard MJ, Dhatt G (1999) A new dynamic finite elements (DFE) formulation for lateral free vibrations of Euler-Bernoulli spinning beams using trigonometric shape functions. J Sound Vib 220(4):601–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Song Y, Song W, Li Y, Yee K, Lee K, Tagarielli VL (2017) Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA. Mater Des 123:154–164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu C, Mao B, Huang G, Wu Q, Xie S, Xu M (2018) Optimization of shape control of a cantilever beam using dielectric elastomer actuators. AIP Adv 8(5):055015–055023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Harris CM, Charles EC (1976) Shock and vibration handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York Print

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the support provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, RGPIN-2017-06868, and NSERC, RGPIN-2018-04144), and Toronto Metropolitan (formerly Ryerson) University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ali Foroozanfar: Investigation, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Data Curation. Mohsin Afridi: Investigation, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Data Curation. Kazem Fayazbakhsh: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing. Seyed M. Hashemi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project Administration, Resources, Writing – Original Draft Review & Editing, Writing – Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.M. Hashemi.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

There is no Conflict of Interest/Competing Interest for this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Foroozanfar, A., Afridi, M., Fayazbakhsh, K. et al. Experimental and Computational Analysis of Elastic Modulus of 3D Printed Parts Using Impulse Excitation Technique (IET). Exp Tech 47, 787–795 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00592-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00592-3

Keywords

Navigation