Skip to main content
Log in

Perspectives and Approaches for the Out-of-Plane Testing of Masonry Infill Walls

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is widely accepted that further and more in-depth research is required on the out-of-plane seismic response of masonry infill walls to increase knowledge regarding this particular behaviour and to develop effective strengthening strategies for preventing their collapse. However, such experimental tests are difficult to perform and the scientific community recognizes the complexity inherent to the test apparatus, loading approaches and loading protocols. At the Laboratory for Earthquake and Structural Engineering (LESE), several efforts were carried out over the last years towards characterizing the out-of-plane behaviour of full-scale MIW. Two test setups were developed using two different approaches for applying the out-of-plane loadings. This manuscript provides an overview of the test setups adopted in the literature by other authors and discusses their implication in the MIW response. Therefore, the considerations assumed in the development of the test setups at the LESE laboratory are provided starting by describing the out-of-plane tests with airbags and after that with pneumatic jacks. Further information regarding both tests setups is described and discussed throughout the manuscript. Experimental results of two specimens tested with both approaches are presented, highlighting the main differences and similarities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Romão X et al (2013) Field observations and interpretation of the structural performance of constructions after the 11 May 2011Lorca earthquake. Eng Fail Anal 34:670–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hermanns L, Fraile A, Alarcón E, Álvarez R (2014) Performance of buildings with masonry infill walls during the 2011 Lorca earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 12:1977–1997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Furtado A, Costa C, Arêde A, Rodrigues H (2016) Geometric characterisation of Portuguese RC buildings with masonry infill walls. Eur J Environ Civ Eng:1–16

  4. Lee HS, Woo SW (2002) Effect of masonry infills on seismic performance of a 3‐storey R/C frame with non‐seismic detailing. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 31:353–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.112

  5. Vicente R, Rodrigues H, Varum H, Costa A, Mendes da Silva R (2012) Performance of masonry enclosure walls: lessons learned from recent earthquakes,” (in English). Earthq Eng Eng Vib 11(1):23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dawe J, Seah C (1989) Behaviour of masonry infilled steel frames. Can J Civ Eng 16:865–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Risi MT, Di Domenico M, Ricci P, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2019) Experimental investigation on the influence of the aspect ratio on the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction for masonry infills in RC frames. Eng Struct 189:523–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ricci P, Di Domenico M, Verderame GM (2018) Experimental investigation of the influence of slenderness ratio and of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction on the out-of-plane strength of URM infill walls. Constr Build Mater 191:507–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Domenico M, Ricci P, Verderame GM (2018) Experimental assessment of the influence of boundary conditions on the out-of-plane response of unreinforced masonry infill walls. J Earthq Eng:1–39

  10. Akhoundi F, Vasconcelos G, Lourenço P (2018) Experimental out-of-plane behavior of brick masonry Infilled frames. Int J Architectural Herit 14(2):221–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Moghaddam H, Dowling P, Ambraseys N (1988) Shaking table study of brick masonry infilled frames subjected to seismic actions. Presented at the world conference on earthquake engineering - 9WCEE, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dawe J, Seah C (1989) Out-of-plane resistance of concrete masonry infilled panels. Can J Civ Eng 16(6):854–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Angel R, Abrams D, Shapiro D, Uzarski J, Webster M (1994) Behavior of reinforced concrete frames, with masonry infills, civil engineering studies, Reserach series no. 589, UILU-ENG. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ilinois, USA, pp 94–2005

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beconcini M (1997) Sulla resistenza a forze orizzontali di pareti in elementi forati in laterizio. Construire in laterizio 55:60–69

    Google Scholar 

  15. Flanagan R, Bennett R (1999) Bidirectional behaviour of structural clay tile infilled frames. J Struct Eng 125(3):236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Calvi G, Bolognini D (2001) Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels. J Earthq Eng 5(2):153–185

    Google Scholar 

  17. Varela-Rivera J, Polanco-May M, Fernandez-Baqueiro L, Moreno E (2012) Confined masonry walls subjected to combined axial loads and out-of-plane uniform pressures. Can J Civ Eng 39:439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereira P, Pereira M, Ferreira J, Lourenço P (2012) Behavior of masonry infill panels in RC frames subjected to in plane and out of plane loads. Presented at the 7th conference on on analytical models and new concepts in concrete and masonry structure Cracow, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hak S, Morandi P, Magenes G (2014) Out-of-plane experimental response of strong masonry infills. Presented at the second European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology - 2ECEES, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  20. da Porto F, Guidi G, Verlato N, Modena C (2015) Effectiveness of plasters and textile reinforced mortars for strengthening clay masonry infill walls subjected to combined in-plane/out-of-plane actions / Wirksamkeit von Putz und textilbewehrtem Mörtel bei der Verstärkung von Ausfachungswänden aus Ziegelmauerwerk, die kombinierter Scheiben- und Plattenbeanspruchung ausgesetzt Sind, Mauerwerk, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 334–354

  21. Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Arêde A, Varum H (2016) Experimental evaluation of out-of-plane capacity of masonry infill walls. Eng Struct 111:48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mosoarca M, Petrus C, Stoian V, Anastasiadis A (2016) Behaviour of masonry infills subjected to out of plane plane seismic actions part 2: experimental testing. Presented at the international brick and block masonry conference - IB2MAC, Padua

    Google Scholar 

  23. Silva L, Vasconcelos G, Lourenço P, Akhoundi F (2016) Experimental evaluation of a constructive system for earthquake resisting masonry infill walls. Presented at the brick and block masonry conference (IB2MAC), Padua

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liauw T, Kwan K (1992) Experimental study of shear wall and infilled frame on shake-table. Presented at the world conference on earthquake engineering - 10WCEE, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  25. Klingner R, Rubiano N, Bashandy T, Sweeney S (1996) Evaluation and analytical verification of shaking table data from infilled frames. Presented at the world conference on earthquake engineering - 11WCEE, Acapulco

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fardis M, Bousias S, Franchioni G, Panagiotakos T (1999) Seismic response and design of RC structures with plan-eccentric masonry infills. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 28:173–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zarnic R, Gostic S, Crewe A, Taylor A (2001) Shaking table tests of 1:4 reduced scale models of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 30:819–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Corte G, Fiorinho L, Mazzolani F (2008) Lateral-loading tests on a real RC building including masonry infill panels with and without FRP strengthening. J Mater Civ Eng 20(6):419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Komaraneni S, Rai D, Eeri M, Singhal V (2011) Seismic behavior of framed masonry panels with prior damage when subjected to out-of-plane loading. Earthquake Spectra 27(4):1077–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stavridis A, Koutromanos I, Shing P (2012) Shake-table tests of a three-story reinforced concrete frame with maosnry walls. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:1089–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tondelli M, Beyer K, DeJong M (2016) Influence of boundary conditions on the out‐of‐plane response of brick masonry walls in buildings with RC slabs. Earthquake Engng Struct Dyn 45:1337– 1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2710

  32. Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Arêde A, Varum H (2018) Out-of-plane behavior of masonry infilled RC frames based on the experimental tests available: a systematic review. Constr Build Mater 168:831–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Furtado A, Rodrigues H, Arêde A, Varum H (2018) Effect of the panel width support and columns axial load on the infill masonry walls out-of-plane behavior. J Earthq Eng:1–29

  34. Mosallam AS (2007) Out-of-plane flexural behavior of unreinforced red brick walls strengthened with FRP composites. Compos Part B 38:16

    Google Scholar 

  35. Griffith M, Vaculik J, Lam N, Wilson J, Lumantarna E (2007) Cyclic testing of unreinforced masonry walls in two-way bending. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:801–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Griffith M, Vaculik J (2007) Out-of-plane flexural strength of unreinforced clay brick masonry walls. TMS J 25(1):53–68

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ferreira T, Costa AA, Arêde A, Varum H, Costa A (2016) In situ out-of-plane cyclic testing of original and strengthened traditional stone masonry walls using airbags. Abstr J Earthq Eng 20(5):749–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Silva L (2017) Experimental and numerical study of new systems for earthquake resistant masonry enclosures in reinforced concrete buildings, research thesis project. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minho, Guimarães

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lunn DS, Rizkalla SH (2011) Strengthening of infill masonry walls with FRP materials. J Compos Constr 15(2):206–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Di Domenico M, Ricci P, Verderame GM (2019) Predicting the out-of-plane seismic strength of unreinforced masonry infill walls. J Earthq Eng 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1604453

  41. Bitter R, Mohiuddin T, Nawrocki M (2006) LabVIEW: Advanced programming techniques. Crc Press

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by: Base Funding - UIDB/04708/2020 and Programmatic Funding - UIDP/04708/2020 of the CONSTRUCT- Instituto de I&D em Estruturas e Construções - funded by national funds through the FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors whose names are listed in the paper certify that they have no Conflicts of Interest or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest, or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furtado, A., Arêde, A., Melo, J. et al. Perspectives and Approaches for the Out-of-Plane Testing of Masonry Infill Walls. Exp Tech 45, 457–469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00413-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00413-5

Keywords

Navigation