Performance of the Expanded Virtual Point Transformation on a Complex Test Structure

Abstract

The Virtual Point Transformation (VPT) makes it possible to experimentally identify the full DoF FRF matrix by projecting the measured displacements onto the Interface Deformation Modes (IDMs). The VP FRFs were already successfully used in Frequency-Based Substructuring (FBS); however, the VPT is susceptible to deviations in the impact location and orientation, as well as to deviations in the sensor’s sensitivity and positioning. Uncertainties associated with the sensors can be decreased by using the expanded VPT. This expanded VPT allows the projection of a directly measured rotational response onto the Interface Deformation Modes (IDMs). The consistency of the transformation is achieved by using a rotational weighting matrix, which is formulated to minimize the norm of the overall displacements due to the rotational residual at the VP for each rotational sensor. The rotational response is measured using a direct piezoelectric rotational accelerometer. In this paper the application of the expanded virtual point transformation and the possible advantages are explored on a complex and engineering-like test structure. Both transformations, standard and expanded, are performed for each VP to enable a side-by-side comparison.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Notes

  1. 1.

    An interface is considered to be overdetermined when more DoF are included in the coupling than are in fact needed. Consider a perfectly rigid interface, where perfect coupling can be performed with only 6 DoFs (3 translation and 3 rotational). However, with the EMPC method one would need to use 3 triaxial translation accelerometers to account for the rotational DoFs. Therefore, the interface would be overdetermined.

  2. 2.

    An explicit dependency on the frequency is omitted for the simplicity of the notation, and this will also be used for the remainder of the paper.

  3. 3.

    The sensors used for measuring the interface displacement u are usually tri-axial accelerometers, but for the simplicity of the notation, displacements are considered here.

  4. 4.

    The first number in the bracket (2,4) refers to the output position and the second to the input position in the FRFs matrix i.e. (output,input).

  5. 5.

    With the three VPs on the TS, a certain level of over-determination can be expected at the interface, since the whole block is in fact rigid in the low-frequency range. Therefore, even a small error in one of the VPTs can lead to erroneous coupling results. Applying a truncated SVD on the interface flexibility Yint = BYA|BBT (see equation (2)) can be interpreted as a weakening of the interface compatibility, which is advantageous in this configuration.

References

  1. 1.

    de Klerk D, Rixen D, Voormeeren SN (2008) General framework for dynamic substructuring: history, review and classification of techniques. AIAA J 46(5):1169–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Allen MS, Rixen D, van der Seijs M, Tiso P, Abrahamsson T, Mayes R (2020) Substructuring in engineering dynamics springer international publishing

  3. 3.

    Klosterman AL, combined experimental A (1971) Analytical procedure for improving automotive system dynamics, Ph.D. thesis University of Cincinnati Department of Mechanical Engineering

  4. 4.

    Crowley JR, Klosterman AL, Rocklin GT, Vold H (1984) Direct structural modification using frequency response functions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Modal Analysis Conference, A Conference on Structural Dynamics

  5. 5.

    Jetmundsen B, Bielawa RL, Flannely WG (1988) Generalized frequency domain substructure synthesis. Journal of the American Helicopter Society 33(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    de Klerk D, Rixen D, de Jong J (2006) The Frequency Based Substructuring (FBS) Method reformulated according to the Dual Domain Decomposition Method. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Modal Analysis Conference, A Conference on Structural Dynamics

  7. 7.

    Duarte MLM, Ewins DJ (1995) Some Insights into the Importance of Rotational Degrees-of-freedom and Residual Terms in Coupled Structure Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Modal Analysis Conference, A Conference on Structural Dynamics, pp 164–170

  8. 8.

    Sestieri A, Salvini P, Ambrogio W.D’ (1991) Reducing scatter from derived rotational data to determine the frequency response function of connected structures. Mech Syst Signal Process 5(1):25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    de Klerk D, Rixen D, Voormeeren SN, Pasteuning F (2010) Solving the RDoF Problem in Experimental Dynamic Substructuring. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Modal Analysis Conference, A Conference on Structural Dynamics

  10. 10.

    Stefaan H, der Auweraer Herman V, Peter M, Luigi B, Casagrande D (2001) Application of accelerometer-based rotational degree of freedom measurements for engine subframe modelling. In: Proceedings of the XIX International Modal Analysis Conference, A Conference on Structural Dynamics

  11. 11.

    van der Seijs M (2016) Experimental Dynamic substructuring: Analysis and design strategies for vehicle development, Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft

  12. 12.

    Bregar T, Holeček N., Čepon G., Rixen D, Boltežar M. (2020) Including directly measured rotations in the virtual point transformation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 141:106440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Insalaco MD (2000) The Art of Fabricating Rotational Accelerometer, Sensors Magazine

  14. 14.

    Pasma EA, van der Seijs M, Klaassen SWB, van der Kooij MW (2018) Frequency Based Substructuring with the Virtual Point Transformation, Flexible Interface Modes and a Transmission Simulator. In: Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series 4 205–213

  15. 15.

    Haeussler M, Sendlbeck S, Rixen D (2018) Automated correction of sensor orientation in experimental dynamic substructuring. In: Dynamics of Coupled Structures, Volume 4, Springer International Publishing, pp. 65–70

  16. 16.

    Drozg A, Rogelj J, Čepon G., Boltežar M. (2018) On the performance of direct piezoelectric rotational accelerometers in experimental structural dynamics. Measurement 98: 292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Drozg A, Čepon G., Boltežar M. (2018) Full-degrees-of-freedom frequency based substructuring. Mech Syst Signal Process 127:570–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    van der Seijs M, van den Bosch D, Rixen D (2014) D. de Klerk, An improved methodology for the virtual point transformation of measured frequency response functions in dynamic substructuring. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering (COMPDYN 2013), Institute of Structural Analysis and Antiseismic Research School of Civil Engineering National Technical University of Athens (NTUA) Greece

  19. 19.

    El Mahmoudi A, Trainotti F, Park K, Rixen D (2019) In-situ tpa for nvh analysis of powertrains: An evaluation on an experimental test setup AAC. In: 2019: Aachen acoustics colloquium/aachener akustik kolloquium, aachener akustik kolloquium 2019, aachen (germany), 25 nov 2019 - 27 Aachen

  20. 20.

    Allen MS, Mayes R, Bergman EJ (2010) Experimental modal substructuring to couple and uncouple substructures with flexible fixtures and multi-point connections. J Sound Vib 329(23): 4891–4906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mayes R, Ross M (2012) Advancements in hybrid dynamic models combining experimental and finite element substructures. Mech Syst Signal Process 31:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Otte D, Leuridan J, Grangier H, Aquilina R (1991) Prediction of the dynamics of structural assemblies using measured frf-data: some improved data enhancement techniques. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Modal Analysis Conference, A Conference on Structural Dynamics

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the partial financial support from the core research funding P2-0263 and applied research project L2-1837, both financed by ARRS, Slovenian research agency.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Čepon.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bregar, T., El Mahmoudi, A., Čepon, G. et al. Performance of the Expanded Virtual Point Transformation on a Complex Test Structure. Exp Tech 45, 83–93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00398-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Frequency-based substructuring
  • Expanded virtual point transformation
  • Rotational accelerometer
  • Interface rotation