Skip to main content
Log in

Cyclic Properties of Artificially Cemented Gravel-Silty Clay Mixed Soils

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide an insight into the effect of fine content (FC) on the artificially cemented gravel-silty clay mixed soils (CMS) in terms of strength, deformation, effective stress path and pore pressure response by undrained cyclic triaxial tests. In addition, some cyclic triaxial tests were also conducted on remolded gravel-silty clay mixed soils (RMS) under the same test conditions in order to evaluate the effect of cementation provided by the cementitious material. The corresponding cyclic responses, such as the generation and accumulation of axial strain, pore pressure and effective stress path, are compared across a range of CMS and RMS. A constant 5% percentage (by weight) of calcium oxide in mixed soils with four different ratios of fine content (13%, 30%, 50% and 70%) are tested under four types of confining pressures, 50 kPa, 100 kPa, 200 kPa and 300 kPa respectively. The results demonstrate that: an increase in fine content leads to decrease in both strength and liquefaction resistance, but accelerate the strain accumulation and pore pressure development. The cyclic responses of CMS exhibit “hysteresis” significantly compared with those of RMS due to the bonding strength between soil particles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Xu Q, Chen W, Zhang ZY (2008) New views on forming mechanism of deep overburden on river bed in southwest of China. Adv Earth Science 23(5):448–456 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sangrey DA (1972) Naturally cemented sensitive soils. Géotechnique 22(1):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burland JB (1990) On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays. Géotechnique 40(3):329–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Asghari E, Toll DG, Haeri SM (2003) Triaxial behaviour of a cemented gravely sand, Tehran alluvium. Geotech Geol Eng 21(1):1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clough GW, Sitar N, Bachus RC et al (1981) Cemented sands under static loading. Int J Geotech Eng 107(6):799–817

    Google Scholar 

  6. Coop MR, Atkinson JH (1994) The mechanics of cemented carbonate sands. Géotechnique 44(3): 533~537

  7. Haeri SM, Hamidi A, Hosseini SM et al (2006) Effect of cement type on the mechanical behavior of a gravely sand. Geotech Geol Eng 24(2):335–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dejong JT, Montoya BM, Boulanger RW (2013) Dynamic response of liquefiable sand improved by microbial-induced calcite precipitation. Géotechnique 63(4):302–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Airey DW, Fahey M (1991) Cyclic response of calcareous soil from the north-west shelf of Australia. Géotechnique 41(1):101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Panico F, da Fonseca AV (2016) Long term cyclic response of a soil-cement mixture: experimental study and Modelling. Procedia Engineering 143:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang WS (1980) Some findings in soil liquefaction. Chinese Jounal of Geotechnical Engineering 2(3):56–63 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanıbir A, Ulusay R, Aydan Ö (2006) Assessment of liquefaction and lateral spreading on the shore of Lake Sapanca during the Kocaeli (Turkey) earthquake. Eng Geol 83(4):307–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang JH, Yang CW (2001) Verification of critical cyclic strength curve by Taiwan chi-chi earthquake data. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21(3):237–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee DH, Ku CS, Yuan H (2004) A study of the liquefaction risk potential at Yuanlin, Taiwan. Eng Geol 71(1–2):97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Andrus RD (1994) In situ characterization of gravelly soils that liquefied in the 1983 Borah peak earthquake. Ph. D. Dissertation presented to the University of Texas at Austin

  16. Evans MD, Zhou S (1995) Liquefaction behavior of sand-gravel composites. Int J Geotech Eng 121(3):287–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boulanger RW, Meyers MW, Mejia LH et al (1998) Behavior of a fine-grained soil during the Loma Prieta earthquake. Can Geotech J 35(1):146–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Flora A, Lirer S, Silvestri F (2012) Undrained cyclic resistance of undisturbed gravelly soils. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 43(4):366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bezerra FHR, Fonseca VPD, Vita-Finzi C et al (2005) Liquefaction-induced structures in quaternary alluvial gravels and gravelly sediments, NE Brazil. Eng Geol 76(3):191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen L, Yuan X, Cao Z et al (2009) Liquefaction macrophenomena in the great. Wenchuan earthquake Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 8(2):219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hou LQ, Li AF, Qiu ZM (2011) Characteristics of gravelly soil liquefaction in Wenchuan earthquake. Appl Mech Mater 90-93:1498–1502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fan X, Westen CJV, Xu Q et al (2012) Analysis of landslide dams induced by the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. J Asian Earth Sci 57(6):25–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin P, Huang B, Li Q et al (2015) Hazard and seismic reinforcement analysis for typical large dams following the Wenchuan earthquake. Eng Geol 194:86–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 43:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao SN, Rajasekaran G (1994) Lime injection technique to improve the behaviour of soft marine clays. Ocean Eng 21(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marsal RJ (1967) Large scale testing of rockfill materials. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division 93(2):27–43

    Google Scholar 

  27. ASTM D5311(2011) test method for load controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil. Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM international, West Conshohocken

  28. Thevanayagam S, Shenthan T, Mohan S et al (2002) Undrained fragility of Clean Sands, Silty Sands, and Sandy silts. J Geotech Geoenviron 128(10):849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thevanayagam S, Martin GR (2002) Liquefaction in silty soils—screening and remediation issues. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9–12):1035–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang WJ, Hong ML (2008) Effects of clay content on liquefaction characteristics of gap-graded clayey sands. Soils Found 48(1):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ishihara K, Troncoso J, Kawase Y et al (1980) Cyclic strength characteristics of tailings materials. Soils Found 20(4):127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand-silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 23(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gallagher PM, Mitchell JK (2002) Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22(9):1017–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhu-jiang S, Tie-lin C (2005) Breakage mechanics of geological materials-structural type and load sharing. Chinese journal of rock mechanics and Engineering 25(13): 2137–2142(in Chinese)

  35. Schmertmann JH, Osterberg JO (1960) An experimental study of the development of cohesion and friction with axial strain in saturated cohesive soils. Research conference on shear strength of cohesive soils. ASCE, pp. 643–694

  36. Saxena S, Tembhurkar AR (2020) Microbiological induced calcium carbonate process to enhance the properties of cement mortar. Materialstoday: proceedings 21(2):1350–1354

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Shen ZJ (2006) Progress in binary medium modeling of geological materials. Modern Trends in Geomechancis, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 77–99

    Google Scholar 

  38. Liu EL, Yu HS, Zhou C et al (2016) A binary-medium constitutive model for artificially structured soils based on the disturbed state concept and homogenization theory. Int J Geomech 17(7):04016154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work is funded by National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant number 41790431), the CAS Pioneer Hundred Talents Program (Dr. Enlong Liu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E.-l. Liu.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 92 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yu, Hj., Liu, El. Cyclic Properties of Artificially Cemented Gravel-Silty Clay Mixed Soils. Exp Tech 44, 573–589 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00376-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00376-7

Keywords

Navigation