Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic Emission Responses of Three Typical Metals During Plastic and Creep Deformations

  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, the acoustic emission (AE) responses of three typical engineering metals (namely, Q235 carbon steel, H62 brass and 304 stainless steel) during plastic and high-temperature creep deformations were experimentally investigated. To gain insight into the AE response mechanisms, the micro scale mechanical behaviors of these metals were studied with a micro-tensile tester with observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The following observations were found: (1) although the intensities and activities of the AE signals greatly differed under the same configurations, the AE peak values appeared at the transition from elasticity to plasticity for all three metals; (2) compared to the AE signal intensity during plastic deformation, the signal intensity during high-temperature creep was much weaker; (3) slip lines appeared within the crystal grains at the stress level corresponding to the peak AE signal intensity, but the densities of the slip lines and their crossover were not proportional to the AE signals of the metals. From these findings, the following conclusions were drawn about the application of AE: (1) AE is more scientific method to determine the yielding point of a metal without plastic flow than the nominal yield stress; (2) AE can be used to determine the deformation mechanism at high temperature, particularly, to distinguish creep from plastic deformation; (3) the AE response is the result of a sudden energy release by dislocation motion; however, the AE signal intensity is not necessarily proportional to the dislocation activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shashkov IV, Lebyodkin MA, Lebedkina TA (2012) Multiscale study of acoustic emission during smooth and jerky flow in an AlMg alloy [J]. Acta Mater 60(19):6842–6850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinogradov A, Lazarev A, Linderov M et al (2013) Kinetics of deformation processes in high-alloyed cast transformation-induced plasticity/twinning-induced plasticity steels determined by acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy: influence of austenite stability on deformation mechanisms [J]. Acta Mater 61(7):2434–2449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pawelek A, Piatkowski A, Wajda W et al (2016) Mechanisms of plastic instability and fracture of compressed and tensile tested Mg-Li alloys investigated using the acoustic emission method [J]. Frattura ed Integritá Strutturale 35:21

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar J, Ananthakrishna G (2011) Multiscale modeling approach to acoustic emission during plastic deformation [J]. Phys Rev Lett 106(10):106001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ispánovity PD, Laurson L, Zaiser M et al (2014) Avalanches in 2D dislocation systems: plastic yielding is not depinning. [J]. Phys Rev Lett 112(23):235501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Csikor FF, Motz C, Weygand D et al (2007) Dislocation avalanches, strain bursts, and the problem of plastic forming at the micrometer scale [J]. Science 318(5848):251–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koslowski M, LeSar R, Thomson R (2004) Avalanches and scaling in plastic deformation [J]. Phys Rev Lett 93(12):125502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss J, Richeton T, Louchet F et al (2007) Evidence for universal intermittent crystal plasticity from acoustic emission and high-resolution extensometry experiments [J]. Phys Rev B 76(22):224110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cuadra J, Vanniamparambil PA, Servansky D et al (2015) Acoustic emission source modeling using a data-driven approach [J]. J Sound Vib 341:222–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kawai S, Yoshida Y, Asano H et al (2016) Acoustic emission response of magnesium alloy during cyclic and creep tests [J]. Mater Sci Eng A 668:120–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Su F, Pan X, Huang P et al (2016) Influence of copper pumping on integrity and stress of through-silicon Vias [J]. IEEE Trans Compon Packag Manuf Technol 6(8):1221–1225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsiung LM, Schwartz AJ, Nieh TG (2004) In situ TEM observations of interface sliding and migration in a refined lamellar TiAl alloy [J]. Intermetallics 12(7):727–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peterson KA, Dutta I, Chen MW (2003) Diffusionally accommodated interfacial sliding in metal-silicon systems [J]. Acta Mater 51(10):2831–2846

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 11372027 and 11672340). This work was also supported in part by the Importation and Development of High-Caliber Talents Project of Beijing Municipal Institutions (Great Wall Scholar, No. CIT&TCD20150320). In addition, the authors declare that no conflict of interest exists in the submission of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, F., Li, T., Pan, X. et al. Acoustic Emission Responses of Three Typical Metals During Plastic and Creep Deformations. Exp Tech 42, 685–691 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-018-0274-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-018-0274-x

Keywords

Navigation