Recasting the Cancer Stem Cell Hypothesis: Unification Using a Continuum Model of Microenvironmental Forces
Purpose of review
Here, we identify shortcomings of standard compartment-based mathematical models of cancer stem-cells, and propose a continuous formalism which includes the tumor microenvironment.
Stem-cell models of tumor growth have provided explanations for various phenomena in oncology including, metastasis, drug- and radio-resistance, and functional heterogeneity in the face of genetic homogeneity. While some of the newer models allow for plasticity, or de-differentiation, there is no consensus on the mechanisms driving this. Recent experimental evidence suggests that tumor microenvironment factors like hypoxia, acidosis, and nutrient deprivation have causative roles.
To settle the dissonance between the mounting experimental evidence surrounding the effects of the microenvironment on tumor stemness, we propose a continuous mathematical model where we model microenvironmental perturbations like forces, which then shape the distribution of stemness within the tumor. We propose methods by which to systematically measure and characterize these forces, and show results of a simple experiment which support our claims.
KeywordsCancer stem cell hypothesis Mathematical model Partial differential equations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
- 11.Werner B, et al. The cancer stem cell fraction in hierarchically organized tumors can be estimated using mathematical modeling and patient-specific treatment trajectories. Cancer Res. 2016;76:1705–1713. In this paper, Werner et al. use a standard, compartment-based ordinary differential equations model to show how the dynamics of a leukemia under therapy can be used to identify the relative fraction of cancer stem cells. This highlights the utility of the standard models in leukemia, and the clinical data analyzed show how heterogeneous the parameters of a given patient’s underlying system can be.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Leder K, Holland E, Michor F. 2010. The therapeutic implications of plasticity of the cancer stem cell phenotype. PLOS ONE.Google Scholar
- 27.Dhawan A, et al. 2016. Mathematical modelling of phenotypic plasticity and conversion to a stem-cell state under hypoxia. Sci Rep 6.Google Scholar
- 29.Hoffman M, et al. 2008. Noise-driven stem cell and progenitor population dynamics. PLOS ONE 3.Google Scholar
- 38.Enderling H, et al. 2009. Paradoxical dependencies of tumor dormancy and progression on basic cell kinetics. Cancer research :0008–5472.Google Scholar
- 45.Scott J, Hjelmeland A, Chinnaiyan P, Anderson A, Basanta D. Microenvironmental variables must influence intrinsic phenotypic parameters of cancer stem cells to affect tumourigenicity. PLoS Comput Biol 2014;10 (e1003433). Scott et al. show, using a stochastic agent-based model of a tumor which grows obeying the standard hierarchy, that the parameters of the model must be affected by the microenvironment to affect tumorigenicity. This result further highlights the need for heterogeneity across cells within a solid tumor to reflect clinical reality. Google Scholar