Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

A Framework for Mathematical Knowledge for Undergraduate Mathematics Tutors

  • Published:
International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most institutions of higher learning offer undergraduate mathematics tutoring, yet little is known regarding the work tutors do or the knowledge needed to enact that work. We explore the mathematical knowledge needed for the work of undergraduate peer drop-in mathematics tutoring. The data consists of transcripts from eight stimulated recall interviews, two each from four tutors, during which each tutor reflected on six of their recorded tutor sessions per interview. We first summarize and synthesize different conceptualizations of mathematical knowledge for teaching, with particular attention to definitions of knowledge types and their use in teaching. We examine the applicability of conceptualizations of the mathematical knowledge of teaching to tutoring to answer the following research question: How do frameworks for mathematical knowledge for teaching appear in the undergraduate peer drop-in tutoring context? Our findings indicate aspects of mathematical knowledge for teaching frameworks apply to the tutoring context; however, it is not a perfect match. In particular, aspects of mathematical knowledge for teaching which are used in planning tasks are not relevant for the work of drop-in tutors. By understanding the knowledge required for tutoring, future research can explore how this knowledge develops. This understanding may ultimately lead to improved tutor training which focuses on both mathematical knowledge, different from content knowledge gained in the math classroom, and pedagogical knowledge specific to mathematics tutoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcavi, A., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Mathematics tutoring through a constructivist lens: The challenges of sense-making. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior

  • Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 94, 373–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the teaching learning of mathematics (pp. 83–104). Westport, CT: Ablex

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433^56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association

  • Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, Fall, 14–46

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2009). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Knowing mathematics for teaching to learners’ mathematical futures. Paper presented at the The 2009 Curtis Center Mathematics and Teaching Conference

  • Bressoud, D., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Insights and Recommendations from the MAA National Study of College Calculus. MAA Press

  • Byerley, C., & Rickard, B. (2018). Evaluation of impact of Calculus Center on student achievement. The Twenty-First Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. San Diego, CA

  • Byerley, C., Moore-Russ, D., James, C., Johns, C., Rickard, B., & Mills, M. (2019). Defining the varied structures of tutoring centers: Laying the foundation for future research. In: The Twenty-Second Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, (A. Weinberg, D. Moore-Russo, H. Soto & M. Wawro, eds). Oklahoma City, OK, pp. 93–101

  • Byerley, C., James, C., Moore-Russo, D., Rickard, B., Micllsm, M., Holsom, W. … Moritz, D. (2020). Characteristics and Evaluation of Ten Tutoring Centers. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (S.S. Karunakaran, Z. Reed & A. HIggins, eds). Boston, MA, pp. 70–78

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., DiSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, A., Cole, J., Clancy, M., Breen, C., & O’Se, D. (2016). An audit of mathematics support provision on the island of Ireland in 2015. Dublin: National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for research in mathematics education, 28(3), 355–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorko, A. (2021). How students use the ‘see similar example’ feature in online mathematics homework. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 63, 100894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J., Hanson, K., Nuñez, G., & Rasmussen, C. (2015). Beyond plug and chug: An analysis of Calculus I homework. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2), 268–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empson, S. B., & Jacobs, V. R. (2008). Learning to listen to children’s mathematics. International Handbook of Mathematics Teacher Education: Volume 2 (pp. 257–281). Brill Sense

  • Fitzmaurice, O. & Mac an Bhaird, C. (2021). Effective tutoring in mathematics learning support: the student perspective. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–7

  • Fliss, R. K. (2019). From noticing to knowledge: an analysis of teacher noticing and professional knowledge in one-on-one mathematics tutoring (Doctoral dissertation)

  • Foster, B. (2005). MATHS-AID. MSOR Connections, 5(3), 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Godino, J. D., Rivas, H., Burgos, M., & Wilhelmi, M. R. (2019). Analysis of Didactical Trajectories in Teaching and Learning Mathematics: Overcoming Extreme Objectivist and Constructivist Positions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 147–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, E. E., Morgan, R. R., Ponticell, J. A., & O’Malley, C. J. (2004). Tutoring solutions for No Child Left Behind: Research, practice, and policy implications. NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College, Columbia University: Teachers College Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P. L. (1992). Why models matter: An alternate view on professional growth in teaching. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, S. (2000). Teaching as a knowledge-based activity. Oxford review of education, 26(34), 451–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (2016). Responding to children’s mathematical thinking in the moment: An emerging framework of teaching moves. ZDM, 48(1–2), 185–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, A., Thames, M. H., Ribeiro, C. M., & Delaney, S. (2012, July). Using practice to define and distinguish horizon content knowledge. In 12th International Congress in Mathematics Education (12th ICME) (pp. 4635–4644)

  • James, C., & Burks, L. (2018). The Distribution of the Mathematical Work during One-on-one Tutoring. Poster Presented at the Research on Undergraduate Mathematics Education Conference: San Diego

  • Johns, C. A. (2019). Tutor Behaviors in Undergraduate Mathematics Drop-In Tutoring. (Publication No. 27725729) [Doctoral Dissertation, The Ohio State University.] Proquest Dissertation Publishings

  • Johns, C. A., Byerley, C., Moore-Russo, D., Rickard, B., Oien, J., Burks, L. … Mammo, B. (2021). Performance assessment for mathematics tutoring centres. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA. Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/teamat/hrab032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, C. A., Mills, M., & Ryals, M. (accepted) (Eds.). An analysis of the observable behaviors of undergraduate drop-in mathematics tutors. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education.

  • Lawson, D., Grove, M., & Croft, T. (2020). The evolution of mathematics support: a literature review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(8), 1224–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, A. M. (2015). Looking at practice: revealing the knowledge demands of teaching data handling in the primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(3), 283–309. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-014-0138-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2016). Using lesson study to support knowledge development in initial teacher education: Insights from early number classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 57, 161–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, A., Hourigan, M., & Carroll, C. (2017). Exploring the impact of reform mathematics on entry-level pre-service primary teachers attitudes towards mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 509–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2018). Using lesson study to support the teaching of early number concepts: Examining the development of prospective teachers’ specialized content knowledge. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education, 135–158

  • Lew, K., & Zazkis, D. (2019). Undergraduate mathematics students’ at-home exploration of a prove-or-disprove task. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 54, 100674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J., & Spence, M. (1999). Beyond mere knowledge of mathematics: The importance of knowing-to act in the moment. Forms of mathematical knowledge (pp. 135–161). Dordrecht: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M., Johns, C., & Ryals, M. (2019). Peer tutors attending to student mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, (pp. 250–257). Oklahoma City, OK

  • Mills, M., Rickard, B., & Guest, B. (2020). Survey of mathematics tutoring centres in the USA.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,1–21

  • National Council Of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to Action. National Council Of Teachers of Mathematics

  • National Research Council (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Jeremy Kilpatrick, Jane Swafford, and Bradford Findell (eds) Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press

  • Neubrand, M. (2018). Conceptualizations of professional knowledge for teachers of mathematics. ZDM, 50(4), 601–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino-Fan, L., Godino, J. D., Font, V., & Castro, W. F. (2012). Key epistemic features of mathematical knowledge for teaching the derivative. In Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 297–304). Taipei: PME

  • Pino-Fan, L., Godino, J. D., Font, V., & Castro, W. F. (2013). Prospective teacher’s specialized content knowledge on derivative. In Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3195–3205). Antalya: CERME

  • Pino-Fan, L. R., Assis, A., & Castro, W. F. (2015). Towards a methodology for the characterization of teachers’ didactic-mathematical knowledge. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(6), 1429–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino-Fan, L. R., Godino, J. D., & Font, V. (2018). Assessing key epistemic features of didactic-mathematical knowledge of prospective teachers: the case of the derivative. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 21(1), 63–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard, J., & Kim, O. K. (2017). Knowledge of curriculum embedded mathematics: Exploring a critical domain of teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96, 65–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard, B., & Mills, M. (2018). The effect of attending tutoring on course grades in Calculus I. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(3), 341–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryals, M., Johns, C., & Mills, M. (2019). Undergraduate mathematics tutors and students’ challenges of knowing-to act. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, (pp. 1017–1022). Oklahoma City, OK

  • Schoenfeld, A. H., & Kilpatrick, J. (2008). Toward a theory of proficiency in teaching mathematics. International handbook of mathematics teacher education: volume 2 (pp. 321–354). Brill Sense

  • Shuilleabhain, A. N. (2016). Developing mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(3), 12–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schürmann, M., Panse, A., Shaikh, Z., Biehler, R., Schaper, N., Liebendörfer, M., & Hilgert, J. (2021). Consultation Phases in Mathematics Learning and Support Centres. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1–27.

  • Silverman, J., & Thompson, P. W. (2008). Toward a framework for the development of mathematical knowledge for teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(6), 499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleep, L. (2009). Teaching to the mathematical point: Knowing and using mathematics in teaching. (Publication No. 3392837) [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing

  • Speer, N. M., King, K. D., & Howell, H. (2015). Definitions of mathematical knowledge for teaching: Using these constructs in research on secondary and college mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(2), 105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, N. M., & Wagner, J. F. (2009). Knowledge needed by a teacher to provide analytic scaffolding during undergraduate mathematics classroom discussions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 530–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkings, S. (2002). Mathematical and statistical support service at South Bank University. MSOR Connections, 2(3), 13–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. (2012). Using the Knowledge Quartet to develop mathematics content knowledge: the role of reflection on professional development. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F., & Rowland, T. (2011). The knowledge quartet as an organising framework for developing and deepening teachers’ mathematics knowledge. Mathematical knowledge in teaching (pp. 195–212). Dordrecht: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. F., Speer, N. M., & Rossa, B. (2007). Beyond mathematical content knowledge: A mathematician’s knowledge needed for teaching an inquiry-oriented differential equations course. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26, 247–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, N. H., & Stockton, J. C. (2013). Horizon content knowledge in the work of teaching: A focus on planning. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(3), 20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Hartman, S., Uribe, G., & Mencke, R. (2001). The effects of peer tutoring on undergraduate examination scores in mathematics. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 32(1), 22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Mamolo, A. (2011). Reconceptualizing knowledge at the mathematical horizon. For the Learning of Mathematics, 31(2), 8–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Carolyn A. Johns

  2. Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, USA

    Linda C. Burks

Authors
  1. Carolyn A. Johns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda C. Burks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda C. Burks.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johns , C.A., Burks, L.C. A Framework for Mathematical Knowledge for Undergraduate Mathematics Tutors. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. 9, 461–490 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00165-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-022-00165-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation