Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Affective Responses to Natural and Technological Disasters; An Evolutionary Perspective

  • Research
  • Published:
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives and Method

Anecdotal reports indicate more severe psychological distress following technological catastrophes in comparison to natural disasters. Previous research also suggests a more negative evaluation of the outcomes of disasters if they are manmade. On the other hand, evolutionary neuroscience shows differential neural processing of ancient and modern threats. Building upon this literature, we probed valence and arousal ratings of stimuli depicting natural and technological disasters in several standardized affective stimuli datasets used in neuroscience and psychological research.

Results

Our results show that while technological disasters are rated as slightly less arousing than natural disasters they are rated as significantly more unpleasant.

Conclusion

It seems the evolutionary age of disasters is one of the factors that affect emotional experiences evoked by these threats and can impact our evaluations of catastrophes. We discuss how evolutionary psychology might explain our findings and help us to better understand the biological and learned roots of our biases in risk perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  • Ahad, N. A., & Yahaya, S. S. S. (2014, July). Sensitivity analysis of Welch’s t-test. In AIP Conference proceedings (Vol. 1605, No. 1, pp. 888–893). American Institute of Physics.

  • Apicella, C., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2020). Beyond WEIRD: A review of the last decade and a look ahead to the global laboratory of the future. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., Fleming, R., & Davidson, L., M (1983). Natural Disaster and Technological catastrophe. Environment and Behavior, 15(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916583153004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrensmeyer, A. K. (2006). Climate change and human evolution. Science, 311(5760), 476–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchette, I. (2006). Snakes, spiders, guns, and syringes: How specific are evolutionary constraints on the detection of threatening stimuli? Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 59(8), 1484–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, A., Caparos, S., & Blanchette, I. (2022). How threat shapes attention and memory in the Himba, a remote people of Namibia. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 00220221231175063.

  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., El-Deredy, W., & Blanchette, I. (2010). Attentional modulation of visual-evoked potentials by threat: Investigating the effect of evolutionary relevance. Brain and cognition, 74(3), 281–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brun, W. (1992). Cognitive components in risk perception: Natural versus manmade risks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 5(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960050204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, Z., Zhao, Y., Tan, T., Chen, G., Ning, X., Zhan, L., & Yang, J. (2014). Distinct brain activity in processing negative pictures of animals and objects—The role of human contexts. Neuroimage, 84, 901–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.064.

  • Carretié, L., Tapia, M., López-Martín, S., & Albert, J. (2019). EmoMadrid: An emotional pictures database for affect research. Motivation and Emotion, 43(6), 929–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center for research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (2022, December 05). EM-DAT Public. https://public.emdat.be/.

  • Center for research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (2022, September 20). General Classification. https://www.emdat.be/classification.

  • Charles, S. T., & Almeida, D. M. (2006). Daily reports of symptoms and negative affect: Not all symptoms are the same. Psychology and Health, 21(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinq-Mars, J., Blumenthal, A., Grund, A., Hétu, S., & Blanchette, I. (2022). DLPFC controls the rapid neural response to visual threat: An ERP and rTMS study. Brain Research, 1784, 147850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colibazzi, T., Posner, J., Wang, Z., Gorman, D., Gerber, A., Yu, S., & Peterson, B. S. (2010). Neural systems subserving valence and arousal during the experience of induced emotions. Emotion, 10(3), 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, D. L., Bode, S., Murawski, C., & Laham, S. M. (2018). The Socio-Moral Image Database (SMID): A novel stimulus set for the study of social, moral and affective processes. PLoS One, 13(1), e0190954.

  • Delacre, M., Lakens, D., & Leys, C. (2017). Why psychologists should by default use Welch’s t-test instead of Student’s t-test. International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1).

  • Dhum, M., Herwig, U., Opialla, S., Siegrist, M., & Brühl, A. B. (2017). Evolutionary and modern image content differentially influence the processing of emotional pictures. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 11, 415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diconne, K., Kountouriotis, G. K., Paltoglou, A. E., Parker, A., & Hostler, T. J. (2022). Presenting KAPODI–The Searchable database of emotional Stimuli sets. Emotion Review, 14(1), 84–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erlich, N., Lipp, O. V., & Slaughter, V. (2013). Of hissing snakes and angry voices: Human infants are differentially responsive to evolutionary fear-relevant sounds. Developmental science, 16(6), 894–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerland, M. W., & Sandvik, L. (2009). The wilcoxon–mann–whitney test under scrutiny. Statistics in medicine, 28(10), 1487–1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z., Li, H., Chen, G., & Yang, J. (2016). Unconscious processing of negative animals and objects: Role of the amygdala revealed by fMRI. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 10, 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garland, B. (2016). The Risk of Energy Production. http://www.nuceng.ca/refer/risk/risk.htm.

  • Grattan, J., & Torrence, R. (2003). Natural disasters and cultural change. Routledge.

  • Grimm, A., Hulse, L., Preiss, M., & Schmidt, S. (2012). Post-and peritraumatic stress in disaster survivors: An explorative study about the influence of individual and event characteristics across different types of disasters. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 3(1), 7382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A. (2001). Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: Differences in spread can be important. Bmj, 323(7309), 391–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M., Portell, M., Cuxart, A., & Kolev, G. I. (2011). Emotion and reason in everyday risk perception. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24(2), 202–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, M. J., & Fielding, K. S. (2020). Understanding (and reducing) inaction on climate change. Social Issues and Policy Review, 14(1), 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsampouris, E., Turner-Cobb, J. M., Arnold, R., & Barnett, J. C. (2022a). a. unconscious associations between stressor type and ability to cope: An experimental approach using ancient and modern sources of stress. British Journal of Health Psychology, 27(3), 1011–1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katsampouris, E., Turner-Cobb, J. M., Barnett, J. C., & Arnold, R. S. (2022b). b. can ancient and modern stressors be distinguished? A mixed-methods exploration of psychosocial characteristics and health symptoms in young and older adults. Journal of health psychology, 27(3), 624–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitagawa, K. (2021). Disaster risk reduction activities as learning. Natural hazards, 105(3), 3099–3118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the open affective standardized image set (OASIS). Behavior research methods, 49(2), 457–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1997). International affective picture system (IAPS): Technical manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1(39–58), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, E. A., Hansell, S., Diefenbach, M., Leventhal, H., & Glass, D. C. (1996). Negative affect and self-report of physical symptoms: Two longitudinal studies of older adults. Health Psychology, 15(3), 193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, N. E. (2015). Environment and climate of early human evolution. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 43, 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, N. P., van Vugt, M., & Colarelli, S. M. (2018). The evolutionary mismatch hypothesis: Implications for psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoBue, V. (2014). Deconstructing the snake: The relative roles of perception, cognition, and emotion on threat detection. Emotion, 14(4), 701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoBue, V., & Adolph, K. E. (2019). Fear in infancy: Lessons from snakes, spiders, heights, and strangers. Developmental psychology, 55(9), 1889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loschky, L. C., & Larson, A. M. (2010). The natural/man-made distinction is made before basic-level distinctions in scene gist processing. Visual Cognition, 18(4), 513–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magalhães, S. D. S., Miranda, D. K., Miranda, D. M. D., Malloy-Diniz, L. F., & Romano-Silva, M. A. (2018). The Extreme Climate Event Database (EXCEED): Development of a picture database composed of drought and flood stimuli. PLoS One, 13(9), e0204093.

  • Morrice, S. (2013). Heartache and Hurricane Katrina: Recognising the influence of emotion in post-disaster return decisions. Area, 45(1), 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological review, 108(3), 483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oishi, S., & Komiya, A. (2017). Natural disaster risk and collectivism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 48(8), 1263–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International journal of computer vision, 42(3), 145–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandis, N. (2016). Using linear regression for t tests and analysis of variance. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 149(5), 769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradiso, S., Johnson, D. L., Andreasen, N. C., O’Leary, D. S., Watkins, G. L., Ponto, B., L. L., & Hichwa, R. D. (1999). Cerebral blood flow changes associated with attribution of emotional valence to pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral visual stimuli in a PET study of normal subjects. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(10), 1618–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. L. (2016). Meaning making in the context of disasters. Journal of clinical psychology, 72(12), 1234–1246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisor, A. C., & Jones, J. H. (2021). Human adaptation to climate change: An introduction to the special issue. American Journal of Human Biology, 33(4), e23530.

  • Ribeiro, R. L., Pompéia, S., & Bueno, O. F. A. (2005). Comparison of brazilian and american norms for the international affective picture system (IAPS). Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 27, 208–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L., & Markowitz, E. M. (2021). Positive emotions and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, C. A., Johnson, T. C., Cohen, A. S., King, J. W., Peck, J. A., Overpeck, J. T., & Pierson, J. (2007). East African megadroughts between 135 and 75 thousand years ago and bearing on early-modern human origins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(42), 16416–16421.

  • Schreier, A., & Evans, G. (2003). Adrenal cortical response of young children to modern and ancient stressors. Current Anthropology, 44(2), 306–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior therapy, 2(3), 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapouri, S., & Martin, L. L. (2021). Snakes vs. guns: A systematic review of comparisons between phylogenetic and ontogenetic threats. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-021-00181-5.

  • Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J. F., & Rahwan, I. (2017). Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 694–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist, M., & Sütterlin, B. (2014). Human and nature-caused hazards: The affect heuristic causes biased decisions. Risk Analysis, 34(8), 1482–1494. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2022, January 24). B. 2021 U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in historical context. Climate.gov. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/beyond-data/2021-us-billion-dollar-weather-and-climate-disasters-historical.

  • Sonnberger, M., Ruddat, M., Arnold, A., Scheer, D., Poortinga, W., Böhm, G., & Tvinnereim, E. (2021). Climate concerned but anti-nuclear: Exploring (dis) approval of nuclear energy in four european countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 75, 102008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M. (1992). An ecological theory for the origin of Homo. Paleobiology, 18(3), 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subra, B., Muller, D., Fourgassie, L., Chauvin, A., & Alexopoulos, T. (2018). Of guns and snakes: Testing a modern threat superiority effect. Cognition and emotion, 32(1), 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R., & Fincher, C. L. (2014). The parasite-stress theory of sociality, the behavioral immune system, and human social and cognitive uniqueness. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 8(4), 257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trauth, M. H., Maslin, M. A., Deino, A. L., Strecker, M. R., Bergner, A. G., & Dühnforth, M. (2007). High-and low-latitude forcing of Plio-Pleistocene East African climate and human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 53(5), 475–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weierich, M. R., Kleshchova, O., Rieder, J. K., & Reilly, D. M. (2019). The complex affective scene set (COMPASS): Solving the social content problem in affective visual stimulus sets. Collabra: Psychology, 5(1).

  • Zhang, S., & Guo, Q. (2019). Superiority effect in detecting phylogenetic threats under unattentional condition: A visual mismatch negativity study. Psychology Research, 9(9), 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, N., & Zhou, G. (2020). Social media use and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Moderator role of disaster stressor and mediator role of negative affect. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 12(4), 1019–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zsido, A. N., Deak, A., & Bernath, L. (2019). Is a snake scarier than a gun? The ontogenetic–phylogenetic dispute from a new perspective: The role of arousal. Emotion, 19(4), 726. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisor, A. C. & Jones, J. C. (2021). Human adaptation to climate change: An introduction to the special issue American Journal of Human Biology 33(4) 10.1002/ajhb.v33.4 10.1002/ajhb.23530

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support were received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Soheil Shapouri & Leonard L. Martin

  2. Department of Statistics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Omid Arhami

Authors
  1. Soheil Shapouri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leonard L. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Omid Arhami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.S. and L.M. conceived and designed the study and prepared the stimuli. S.S. and O.A. inspected and categorized visual stimuli and analyzed the data. S.S. took the lead in writing the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soheil Shapouri.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shapouri, S., Martin, L.L. & Arhami, O. Affective Responses to Natural and Technological Disasters; An Evolutionary Perspective. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 9, 308–322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00224-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-023-00224-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation