Are Men’s Religious Ties Hormonally Regulated?

Abstract

Objectives

Studies based on the “challenge hypothesis” have linked men’s androgens—testosterone and DHEA—to short term mating and antisocial behaviors. Causal direction at a given stage of the life cycle remains ambiguous. Religion is a major social institution through which actions violating social norms are controlled. Thus, ties to this institution may be lower among men with higher androgen levels. The present study queried these linkages.

Procedures

Data were from the 2005–2006 and 2010–2011 waves of the National Social Life, Health and Aging Project (NSHAP), a national probability sample of older U.S. adults. Analysis was through autoregressive cross-lagged panel models (minimum N = 1071).

Results

Higher baseline levels of both testosterone and DHEA prospectively predicted religious ties, whether measured through attendance at services or network connections to clergy. Moreover, contrary to arguments of sociocultural modulation of androgens, the pattern of associations was most consistent with hormonal causation of religious connections. Results were robust to a range of time invariant and time varying confounders, including demographics, hormone supplements, and physical health.

Conclusions

Findings add to the growing evidence that religiosity may have physiological and not simply psychosocial roots. Implications for hormonal confounding of previously published religion-deviance linkages, and for neuroendocrine underpinnings of population-level social and cultural patterns, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Archer, J. (2006). Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.12.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aromaki, A. S., Lindman, R. E., & Eriksson, C. J. P. (1999). Testosterone, aggressiveness, and antisocial personality. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(1999)25:2<113::aid-ab4>3.3.co;2-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, J. B., Berkley, K. J., Geary, N., Hampson, E., Herman, J., & Young, E. (Eds.). (2008). Sex differences in the brain: From genes to behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berenbaum, S. A., Blakemore, J. E. O., & Beltz, A. M. (2011). A role for biology in gender-related behavior. Sex Roles, 64, 804–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9990-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradshaw, M., & Ellison, C. G. (2009). The nature-nurture debate is over, and both sides lost! Implications for understanding gender differences in religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01443.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradshaw, M., & Ellison, C. G. (2010). Financial hardship and psychological distress: Exploring the buffering effects of religion. Social Science & Medicine, 71, 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Buck, A. C., Williams, D. R., Musick, M. A., & Sternthal, M. J. (2009). An examination of the relationship between multiple dimensions of religiosity, blood pressure and hypertension. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 314–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carré, J. M., & Olmstead, N. A. (2015). Social neuroendocrinology of human aggression: Examining the role of competition-induced testosterone dynamics. Neuroscience, 286, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., & Wilcox, C. (1992). Between two absolutes: Public opinion and the politics of abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cornwell, B., Laumann, E. O., & Schumm, L. P. (2008). The social connectedness of older adults: A national profile. American Sociological Review, 73, 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crosnoe, R., & Elder Jr., G. H. (2002). Successful adaptation in the later years: A life course approach to aging. Social Psychology Quarterly, 65, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Curran, P. J. (2000). A latent curve framework for the study of developmental trajectories in adolescent substance use. In J. S. Rose, L. Chassin, C. C. Presson, & S. J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research: New methods for new questions (pp. 1–4). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dabbs Jr., J. M. (1990). Salivary testosterone measurements: Reliability across hours, days, and weeks. Physiology & Behavior, 48, 83–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(90)90265-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dabbs Jr., J. M., & Morris, R. (1990). Testosterone, social class, and antisocial behavior in a sample of 4,462 men. Psychological Science, 1, 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das, A., & Nairn, S. (2014). Conservative Christianity, partnership, hormones and sex in late life. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1403–1415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0273-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ellis, L., Hoskin, A. W., & Ratnasingam, M. (2016). Testosterone, risk taking, and religiosity: Evidence from two cultures. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.12248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellison, C. G., & Nybroten, K. A. (1999). Conservative protestantism and opposition to state-sponsored lotteries: Evidence from the 1997 Texas poll. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 356–369.

  18. Ferraro, K. F., & Kim, S. (2014). Health benefits of religion among black and white older adults? Race, religiosity, and C-reactive protein. Social Science and Medicine, 120, 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gavrilova, N., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Salivary sex hormone measurement in a national, population-based study of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64B, i94–i105. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn028.

  20. Gettler, L. T., & Oka, R. C. (2016). Aging US males with multiple sources of emotional social support have low testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Granger, D. A., Kivlighan, K. T., Fortunato, C., Harmon, A. G., Hibel, L. C., Schwartz, E. B., & Whembolua, G.-L. (2007). Integration of salivary biomarkers into developmental and behaviorally-oriented research: Problems and solutions for collecting specimens. Physiology & Behavior, 92, 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gröschl, M., Wagner, R., Rauh, M., & Dörr, H. G. (2001). Stability of salivary steroids: The influences of storage, food and dental care. Steroids, 66, 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-128x(01)00111-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hall, S. A., Esche, G. R., Araujo, A. B., Travison, T. G., Clark, R. V., Williams, R. E., & McKinlay, J. B. (2008). Correlates of low testosterone and symptomatic androgen deficiency in a population-based sample. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 93, 3870–3877. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Halpern, C. T., Udry, J. R., Campbell, B., Suchindran, C., & Masont, G. A. (1994). Testosterone and religiosity as predictors of sexual attitudes and activity among adolescent males: A biosocial model. Journal of Biosocial Science, 26, 217–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021932000021258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hines, M. (2011). Gender development and the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 69–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Katz, S. (1983). Assessing self maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 31, 721–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1983.tb03391.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kelly, P. E., Polanin, J. R., Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2015). Religion, delinquency, and drug use: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice Review, 40, 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016815605151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kozloski, M. J., Schumm, L. P., & McClintock, M. K. (2014). The utility and dynamics of salivary sex hormone measurements in the National Social Life, health, and aging project, wave 2. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, S215–S228. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krause, N. M. (2008). Aging in the church: How social relationships affect health. Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leege, D. C., & Kellstedt, L. A. (1993). Rediscovering the religious factor in American politics. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Levin, J., & Chatters, L. M. (2008). Religion, aging and health: Historical perspectives, current trends and future directions. Journal of Religion, Spirituality & Aging, 20, 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528030801922103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Linquist, S., Machery, E., Griffiths, P. E., & Stotz, K. (2011). Exploring the folkbiological conception of human nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller, A. S., & Stark, R. (2002). Gender and religiousness: Can socialization explanations be saved? American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1399–1423. https://doi.org/10.1086/342557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nyante, S. J., Graubard, B. I., Li, Y., Mcquillan, G. M., Platz, E. A., Rohrmann, S., et al. (2012). Trends in sex hormone concentrations in US males: 1988-1991 to 1999-2004. International Journal of Andrology, 35, 456–466. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2011.01230.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. O’Muircheartaigh, C. A., English, N., Pedlow, S., & Kwok, P. K. (2014). Sample design, sample augmentation, and estimation for wave 2 of the NSHAP. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69, S15–S26. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qato, D. M., Schumm, L. P., Johnson, M., Mihai, A., & Lindau, S. T. (2009). Medication data collection and coding in a home-based survey of older adults. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i86–i93. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Regnerus, M. D. (2007). Forbidden fruit: Sex and religion in the lives of American teenagers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schieman, S. (2010). Socioeconomic status and beliefs about god’s influence in everyday life. Sociology of Religion: A. Quarterly Review, 71, 25–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srq004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Schnittker, J. (2008). Happiness and success: Genes, families, and the psychological effects of socioeconomic position and social support. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S233–S259. https://doi.org/10.1086/592424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1997). The cognitive structure of a moral crusade: Conservative Protestantism and opposition to pornography. Social Forces, 75, 957–980. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sherkat, D. E., & Ellison, C. G. (1999). Recent developments and current controversies in the sociology of religion. Annual Review Sociology, 25, 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stark, R. (1996). Religion as context: Hellfire and delinquency one more time. Sociology of Religion, 57, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Stark, R. (2002). Physiology and faith: Addressing the “universal” gender difference in religious commitment. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41, 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Udry, J. R. (1988). Biological predispositions and social control in adolescent sexual behavior. American Sociological Review, 53, 709–722. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in north American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51, 454–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Bell, S. N. (2014). Measurement of testosterone in human sexuality research: Methodological considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-013-0123-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Van Anders, S. M., Steiger, J., & Goldey, K. L. (2015). Effects of gendered behavior on testosterone in women and men. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 13805–13810. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509591112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Weuve, J., Tchetgen Tchetgen, E. J., Glymour, M. M., Beck, T. L., Aggarwal, N. T., Wilson, R. S., Evans, D. A., & Mendes de Leon, C. F. (2012). Accounting for bias due to selective attrition: The example of smoking and cognitive decline. Epidemiology, 23, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e318230e861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wilcox, W. B. (2006). Religion and the domestication of men. Contexts, 5, 42–46.

  51. Williams, S. R., Pham-Kanter, G., & Leitsch, S. A. (2009). Measures of chronic conditions and diseases associated with aging in the National Social Life, health, and aging project. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, i67–i75. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty Jr, A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136, 829–846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/285134

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aniruddha Das.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, A. Are Men’s Religious Ties Hormonally Regulated?. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 4, 306–320 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0094-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Challenge hypothesis
  • Salivary androgens
  • Testosterone
  • DHEA
  • Religious connections
  • Older men