Abstract
Previous research indicates that men’s testosterone levels, or personality and contextual variables known to influence testosterone levels, predict men’s attributions of social and personality characteristics from faces. However, the correlational nature of many of these past findings precludes our ability to establish causal pathways. Here, across two pharmacological challenge experiments, we examined the extent to which testosterone reduced men’s perceptions of trustworthiness from emotionally-neutral faces (Experiment 1, N = 30, within-subjects design) or sensitivity to dominance from men’s faces that varied in characteristically dominant shape (Experiment 2, N = 117, between-subjects design). Results from Experiment 1 showed that administration of testosterone did not significantly lower men’s perceptions of trustworthiness. An unexpected order effect (i.e., drug x order of administration interaction) showed that trustworthiness ratings were higher after testosterone, but only if men received testosterone on the first day and placebo on the second day; importantly, this effect was directionally opposite to that reported in the literature and to that predicted for the present study. Experiment 2 demonstrated that dominance perceptions did not vary as a function of whether men received testosterone or placebo. Supplementary analyses with linear mixed effects generally support the main findings across experiments, but also provide more nuanced details involving exploratory individual difference variables. Results from the present experiments provide important information to a growing body of research examining testosterone and complex social processes, and may help inform future research on the topic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Our mixed-level model predicting ratings of trustworthiness from drug condition, order of drug administration, sex of stimuli, and their interactions was specified as: lmer(Trust ~ DrugCondition * OrderAdministration * StimSex + (1 + DrugCondition: StimSex | ParticipantID) + (1 + DrugCondition: OrderAdministration | StimulusID) + (1 | ParticipantID: StimulusID), data = [DATAFILENAME], REML = FALSE). Note that fixed effects are those appearing after “~” but before the first bracket, whereas random effects are those terms that appear within the brackets after the “~”.
We use the following model specifications: glmer(Dominance_SelectAface ~ DrugCondition * ManipulationDegree + (1 + ManipulationDegree | ParticipantID) + (1 + DrugCondition: ManipulationDegree | StimulusID), family = binomial(link = “logit”), nAGQ = 0, control = glmerControl (optimizer = “nloptwrap”), data = s2final). The “nAGQ = 0” and “optimizer = “nloptwrap” commands were used to increase the speed of model fitting.
References
Apicella, C. L., Dreber, A., & Mollerstrom, J. (2014). Salivary testosterone change following monetary wins and losses predicts future financial risk-taking. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 39, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.025.
Arnocky, S., Taylor, S. M., Olmstead, N. A., & Carré, J. M. (2016). The effects of exogenous testosterone on men’s moral decision-making. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-016-0046-8.
Barr, D. J. (2013). Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 328.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278.
Bates, D., Maechler, B. B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Beehner, J. C., Bergman, T. J., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., & Whitten, P. L. (2006). Testosterone predicts future dominance rank and mating activity among male chacma baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59, 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-005-0071-2.
Benson, P. J., & Perrett, D. I. (1993). Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception, 22(3), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1068/p220257.
Bird, B. M., Welling, L. L., Ortiz, T. L., Moreau, B. J., Hansen, S., Emond, M., et al. (2016a). Effects of exogenous testosterone and mating context on men's preferences for female facial femininity. Hormones and Behavior, 85, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.08.003.
Bird, B. M., Jofré, V. S. C., Geniole, S. N., Welker, K. M., Drug, S., Maestripieri, D., et al. (2016b). Does the facial width-to-height ratio map onto variability in men's testosterone concentrations? Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(5), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.03.004.
Boksem, M. A., Mehta, P. H., Van den Bergh, B., van Son, V., Trautmann, S. T., Roelofs, K., et al. (2013). Testosterone inhibits trust but promotes reciprocity. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2306–2314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613495063.
Bos, P. A., Terburg, D., & van Honk, J. (2010). Testosterone decreases trust in socially naive humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(22), 9991–9995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911700107.
Bos, P. A., Panksepp, J., Bluthé, R. M., & van Honk, J. (2012). Acute effects of steroid hormones and neuropeptides on human social–emotional behavior: a review of single administration studies. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 33(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2011.01.002.
Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. F., Gray, P. B., McIntyre, M. H., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44(2), 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0018-506X(03)00125-9.
Buunk, A. P., Park, J. H., Zurriaga, R., Klavina, L., & Massar, K. (2008). Height predicts jealousy differently for men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.11.006.
Carré, J. M., & McCormick, C. M. (2008). Aggressive behavior and change in salivary testosterone concentrations predict willingness to engage in a competitive task. Hormones and Behavior, 54(3), 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.04.008.
Carré, J. M., & Olmstead, N. A. (2015). Social neuroendocrinology of human aggression: examining the role of competition-induced testosterone dynamics. Neuroscience, 286, 171–186.
Carré, J. M., McCormick, C. M., & Mondloch, C. J. (2009a). Facial structure is a reliable cue of aggressive behavior. Psychological Science, 20, 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02423.x.
Carré, J. M., Putnam, S. K., & McCormick, C. M. (2009b). Testosterone responses to competition predict future aggressive behaviour at a cost to reward in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34(4), 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.018.
Carré, J. M., Campbell, J. A., Lozoya, E., Goetz, S. M., & Welker, K. M. (2013). Changes in testosterone mediate the effect of winning on subsequent aggressive behaviour. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(10), 2034–2041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.03.008.
Carré, J. M., Baird-Rowe, C. D., & Hariri, A. R. (2014). Testosterone responses to competition predict decreased trust ratings of emotionally neutral faces. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 49, 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.06.011.
Carré, J. M., Ortiz, T. L., Labine, B., Moreau, B. J., Viding, E., Neumann, C. S., & Goldfarb, B. (2015). Digit ratio (2D: 4D) and psychopathic traits moderate the effect of exogenous testosterone on socio-cognitive processes in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 62, 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.08.023.
Carré, J. M., Geniole, S. N., Ortiz, T. L., Bird, B. M., Videto, A., & Bonin, P. L. (2017). Exogenous testosterone rapidly increases aggressive behavior in dominant and impulsive men. Biological Psychiatry, 82, 249–256.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Eisenegger, C., von Eckardstein, A., Fehr, E., & von Eckardstein, S. (2013). Pharmacokinetics of testosterone and estradiol gel preparations in healthy young men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(2), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.05.018.
Fink, B., Neave, N., & Seydel, H. (2007). Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. American Journal of Human Biology, 19(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20583.
Foradori, C. D., Weiser, M. J., & Handa, R. J. (2008). Non-genomic actions of androgens. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 29(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.10.005.
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2011). An an {R} companion to applied regression (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Geniole, S. N., Bird, B. M., Ruddick, E. L., & Carré, J. M. (2017). Effects of competition outcome on testosterone concentrations in humans: an updated meta-analysis. Hormones and Behavior, 92, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2016.10.002.
Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011). Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(39), 16194–16199. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105403108.
Goetz, S. M., Tang, L., Thomason, M. E., Diamond, M. P., Hariri, A. R., & Carré, J. M. (2014). Testosterone rapidly increases neural reactivity to threat in healthy men: a novel two-step pharmacological challenge paradigm. Biological Psychiatry, 76(4), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.016.
Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., McIntyre, M. H., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2004). Human male pair bonding and testosterone. Human Nature, 15(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-004-1016-6.
Hansen, S., McAuliffe, J., Goldfarb, B., & Carré, J. M. (2017). Testosterone influences volitional, but not reflexive orienting of attention in human males. Physiology & Behavior, 175, 82–87.
Hughes, J. (2017). Reghelper: helper functions for regression analysis. R package, version 0.3.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=reghelper.
IBM Corp. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625.
Kandrik, M., Hahn, A. C., Han, C., Wincenciak, J., Fisher, C. I., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2017). Does the interaction between cortisol and testosterone predict men’s facial attractiveness? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0064-1.
Little, A. C. (2014). Facial attractiveness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(6), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1316.
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 366(1571), 1638–1659. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces - KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, ISBN 91-630-7164-9.
Mazur, A. (1976). Effects of testosterone on status in primate groups. Folia Primatologica, 26(3), 214–226.
Mazur, A. (1985). A biosocial model of status in face-to-face primate groups. Social Forces, 64, 377–402.
Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21(03), 353–363.
Mehta, P. H., & Josephs, R. A. (2006). Testosterone change after losing predicts the decision to compete again. Hormones and Behavior, 50(5), 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.07.001.
Mehta, P. H., van Son, V., Welker, K. M., Prasad, S., Sanfey, A. G., Smidts, A., & Roelofs, K. (2015). Exogenous testosterone in women enhances and inhibits competitive decision-making depending on victory–defeat experience and trait dominance. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 60, 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.07.004.
Muehlenbein, M. P., Watts, D. P., & Whitten, P. L. (2004). Dominance rank and fecal testosterone levels in adult male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. American Journal of Primatology, 64(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20062.
Muller, M. N., & Wrangham, R. W. (2004). Dominance, aggression and testosterone in wild chimpanzees: a test of the ‘challenge hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 67(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.03.013.
Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(32), 11087–11092. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805664105.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998603100443.
Rahman, F., & Christian, H. C. (2007). Non-classical actions of testosterone: an update. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 18(10), 371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2007.09.004.
Rowland, D. A., & Perrett, D. I. (1995). Manipulating facial appearance through shape and color. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 15(5), 70–76.
Sapolsky, R. M. (1991). Testicular function, social rank and personality among wild baboons. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 16(4), 281–293.
Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1177.
Sellers, J. G., Mehl, M. R., & Josephs, R. A. (2007). Hormones and personality: testosterone as a marker of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.004.
Stanton, S. J., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2009). The hormonal correlates of implicit power motivation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 942–949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.001.
Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.946630.
Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R., & Mende-Siedlecki, P. (2015). Social attributions from faces: determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 519–545. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831.
Trainor, B. C., Bird, I. M., & Marler, C. A. (2004). Opposing hormonal mechanisms of aggression revealed through short-lived testosterone manipulations and multiple winning experiences. Hormones and Behavior, 45(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.09.006.
Turan, B., Guo, J., Boggiano, M. M., & Bedgood, D. (2014). Dominant, cold, avoidant, and lonely: basal testosterone as a biological marker for an interpersonal style. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.008.
Watkins, C. D., & Jones, B. C. (2012). Priming men with different contest outcomes modulates their dominance perceptions. Behavioral Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr221.
Watkins, C. D., Fraccaro, P. J., Smith, F. G., Vukovic, J., Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2010a). Taller men are less sensitive to cues of dominance in other men. Behavioral Ecology, 21(5), 943–947. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq091.
Watkins, C. D., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2010b). Individual differences in dominance perception: dominant men are less sensitive to facial cues of male dominance. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 967–971.
Watkins, C. D., Debruine, L. M., Feinberg, D. R., & Jones, B. C. (2013). A sex difference in the context-sensitivity of dominance perceptions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(5), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.06.004.
Welling, L. L., Persola, L., Wheatley, J. R., Cárdenas, R. A., & Puts, D. A. (2013). Competition and men’s face preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 414–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.014.
Welling, L. L., Moreau, B. J., Bird, B. M., Hansen, S., & Carré, J. M. (2016). Exogenous testosterone increases men’s perceptions of their own physical dominance. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 64, 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.11.016.
van Wingen, G. A., Zylicz, S. A., Pieters, S., Mattern, C., Verkes, R. J., Buitelaar, J. K., & Fernández, G. (2009). Testosterone increases amygdala reactivity in middle-aged women to a young adulthood level. Neuropsychopharmacology, 34(3), 539–547. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2008.2.
Watkins, C. D., & Jones, B. C. (2016). Competition-related factors directly influence preferences for facial cues of dominance in allies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70(12), 2071–2079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2211-2
Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty Jr., A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The "challenge hypothesis": theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136(6), 829–846.
Zilioli, S., & Bird, B. M. (2017). Functional significance of men’s testosterone reactivity to social stimuli. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.06.002.
Funding
This work was supported by a Joseph-Armand Bombardier CGS Doctoral Scholarship to BMB, as well as a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant to JMC, and a Northern Ontario Heritage Fund Corporation Grant to JMC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 76 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bird, B.M., Geniole, S.N., Little, A.C. et al. Does Exogenous Testosterone Modulate Men’s Ratings of Facial Dominance or Trustworthiness?. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 3, 365–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0079-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-017-0079-7