Advertisement

Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology

, Volume 3, Issue 1, pp 71–90 | Cite as

Pair Bonding and Testosterone in Men: Longitudinal Evidence for Trait and Dynamic Associations

  • Emily R. Dibble
  • Katherine L. Goldey
  • Sari M. van Anders
Original Article

Abstract

Testosterone (T) and pair bonding in men are linked such that lower T is associated with monoamorous partnering (i.e., with one person) and high T is associated with singlehood. However, it has remained unclear whether T levels predict partnering status or vice versa. Evidence suggests time course of T measurements in relation to partnering as well as nurturant and sexual experiences may affect whether T predicts partnering or vice versa and that transitions into or out of partnerhood may have unique associations with changes in T. We examined links between salivary T levels, relationship status, and relationship status transitions in 78-first year male college students over an approximately year-long period. Using longitudinal data, our findings largely support trait associations between T and relationship status in men, i.e., that T predicts relationship status. However, our data also provide novel evidence of dynamic associations and differences in T levels at different relationship status transitions.

Keywords

Testosterone Pair bonding Directionality Longitudinal Relationships 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Terri L. Conley, Divya Patel, and the members of the van Anders and Conley Labs for help with data collection.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This study was funded by faculty discretionary funds.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research Involving Human Participants

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alvergne, A., Jokela, M., Faurie, C., & Lummaa, V. (2010). Personality and testosterone in men from a high-fertility population. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 840–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beehner, J., Bergman, T., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., & Whitten, P. (2006). Testosterone predicts future dominance rank and mating activity among male chacma baboons. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(4), 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Booth, A., & Dabbs, J. M. (1993). Testosterone and men's marriages. Social Forces, 72(2), 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachement theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, P. J. (2006). Inverse prediction. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, Online.Google Scholar
  6. Burnham, T. C., Chapman, J. F., Gray, P. B., McIntyre, M. H., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2003). Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 44(2), 119–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campbell, K. L., Schultheiss, O. C., & McClelland, D. C. (1999). A necessary adjustment of protocol for use of DPC coat-a-count total testosterone assay with saliva. Clinical Biochemistry, 32(1), 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carter, C. S. (1998). Neuroendocrine perspectives on social attachment and love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 23(8), 779–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das, A., & Sawin, N. (2016). Social modulation or hormonal causation? Linkages of testosterone with sexual activity and relationship quality in a nationally representative longitudinal sample of older adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45, 2101–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diamond, L. M. (2003). What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire. Psychological Review, 110(1), 173–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Duckworth, A. L., Tsukayama, E., & May, H. (2010). Establishing causality using longitudinal hierarchical linear modeling: an illustration predicting achievement from self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 311–317.Google Scholar
  13. Dupuy, H. J. (1973). Developmental rationale, substantive, derivative, and conceptual relevance of the general well-being schedule. Fairfax, VA: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  14. Edelstein, R. S., Chopik, W. J., & Kean, E. L. (2011). Sociosexuality moderates the association between testosterone and relationship status in men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 60(3), 248–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edelstein, R. S., van Anders, S. M., Chopik, W. J., Goldey, K. L., & Wardecker, B. M. (2014). Dyadic associations between testosterone and relationship quality in couples. Hormones and Behavior, 65(4), 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrelly, D., Owens, R., Elliott, H. R., Walden, H. R., & Wetherell, M. A. (2015). The effects of being in a "new relationship" on levels of testosterone in men. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 250–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Are hookups replacing romantic relationships? A longitudinal study of first-year female college students. The Journal of Adolescent Health : Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 52(5), 657–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garson, G. D. (2013). Fundamentals of hierarchical linear and multilevel modeling. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Hierarchical linear modeling: guide and applications (pp. 3–25). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gesquiere, L. R., Learn, N. H., Simao, M. C. M., Onyango, P. O., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2011). Life at the top: rank and stress in wild male baboons. Science, 333(6040), 357–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2011). Longitudinal evidence that fatherhood decreases testosterone in human males. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(39), 16194–16199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gettler, L. T., McDade, T. W., Agustin, S. S., Feranil, A. B., & Kuzawa, C. W. (2013). Do testosterone declines during the transition to marriage and fatherhood relate to men's sexual behavior? Evidence from the Philippines. Hormones and Behavior, 64(5), 755–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray, P. B., Kahlenberg, S. M., Barrett, E. S., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2002). Marriage and fatherhood are associated with lower testosterone in males. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(3), 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray, P. B., Campbell, B. C., Marlowe, F. W., Lipson, S. F., & Ellison, P. T. (2004). Social variables predict between-subject but not day-to-day variation in the testosterone of US men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(9), 1153–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray, P. B., Ellison, P. T., & Campbell, B. C. (2007). Testosterone and marriage among Ariaal men of northern Kenya. Current Anthropology, 48(5), 750–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helweg-Larsen, M., & Collins, B. E. (1994). The UCLA multidimensional condom attitudes scale: documenting the complex determinants of condom use in college students. Health Psychology, 13(3), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hewitt, B., Turrell, G., & Giskes, K. (2010). Marital loss, mental health and the role of perceived social support: findings from six waves of an Australian population based panel study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66(4), 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hudson, W., Harrison, D., & Crosscup, P. (1981). A short-form scale to measure sexual discord in dyadic relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 17(2), 157–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, F., Sepekoff, B., & Wolf, T. J. (1985). Sexual orientation: A multi-variable dynamic process. Journal of Homosexuality, 11(1–2), 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotter-Grühn, D., Smith, J., & Smith, J. (2011). When time is running out: changes in positive future perception and their relationships to changes in well-being in old age. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lippa, R. A. (2010). Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marazziti, D., & Canale, D. (2004). Hormonal changes when falling in love. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29(7), 931–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazur, A., & Michalek, J. (1998). Marriage, divorce, and male testosterone. Social Forces, 77(1), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McIntrye, M., Gangestad, S. W., Gray, P. B., Chapman, J. F., Burnham, T. C., O'Rourke, M. T., et al. (2006). Romantic involvement often reduces men's testosterone levels--but not always: the moderating role of extrapair sexual interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(4), 642–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: a critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45(1), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peplau, L. A., Hill, C. T., & Rubin, Z. (1993). Sex role attitudes in dating and marriage: a 15-year follow-up of the Boston couples study. Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quissell, D. O. (1993). Steroid hormone analysis in human saliva. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 694, 143–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Regan, P. C., Levin, M. S., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. S., & Gate, R. (2000). What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners? Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12(3), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roney, J. R., & Gettler, L. T. (2015). The role of testosterone in human romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 181–186.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). The investment model scale: measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42(3), 290–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sakaguchi, K., Oki, M., Honma, S., Uehara, H., & Hasegawa, T. (2007). The lower salivary testosterone levels among unmarried and married sexually active men. Journal of Ethology, 25(3), 223–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sapolsky, R. M. (1983). Endocrine aspects of social instability in the olive baboon (Papio anubis). American Journal of Primatology, 5(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmitt, D. P. (2004). The big five related to risky sexual behaviour across 10 world regions: differential personality associations of sexual promiscuity and relationship infidelity. European Journal of Personality, 18(4), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schneiderman, I., Kanat-Maymon, Y., Zagoory-Sharon, O., & Feldman, R. (2014). Mutual influences between partners' hormones shape conflict dialog and relationship duration at the initiation of romantic love. Social Neuroscience, 9(4), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sellers, J. G., Mehl, M. R., & Josephs, R. A. (2007). Hormones and personality: testosterone as a marker of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(1), 126–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sobolewski, M. E., Brown, J. L., & Mitani, J. C. (2013). Female parity, male aggression, and the challenge hypothesis in wild chimpanzees. Primates; Journal of Primatology, 54(1), 81–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Spector, I. P., Carey, M. P., & Steinberg, L. (1996). The sexual desire inventory: development, factor structure, and evidence of reliability. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 22(3), 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van Anders, S. M. (2013). Beyond masculinity: testosterone, gender/sex, and human social behavior in a comparative context. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 34(3), 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Anders, S. M., & Goldey, K. L. (2010). Testosterone and partnering are linked via relationship status for women and 'relationship orientation' for men. Hormones and Behavior, 58(5), 820–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. van Anders, S. M., & Gray, P. B. (2007). Hormones and human partnering. Annual Review of Sex Research, 18(1), 60–93.Google Scholar
  53. van Anders, S. M., & Watson, N. V. (2006). Relationship status and testosterone in North American heterosexual and non-heterosexual men and women: cross-sectional and longitudinal data. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31(6), 715–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. van Anders, S. M., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Testosterone levels in women and men who are single, in long-distance relationships, or same-city relationships. Hormones and Behavior, 51(2), 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Anders, S. M., Hampson, E., & Watson, N. V. (2006). Seasonality, waist-to-hip ratio, and salivary testosterone. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 31(7), 895–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Anders, S. M., Hamilton, L. D., & Watson, N. V. (2007). Multiple partners are associated with higher testosterone in north American men and women. Hormones and Behavior, 51(3), 454–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Kuo, P. X. (2011). The steroid/peptide theory of social bonds: integrating testosterone and peptide responses for classifying social behavioral contexts. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36(9), 1265–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., Conley, T. D., Snipes, D. J., & Patel, D. A. (2012). Safer sex as the bolder choice: testosterone is positively correlated with safer sex behaviorally relevant attitudes in young men. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(3), 727–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. van Anders, S. M., Goldey, K. L., & Bell, S. N. (2014). Measurement of testosterone in human sexuality research: methodological considerations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. West, B. T. (2009). Analyzing longitudinal data with the linear mixed models procedure in SPSS. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 32(3), 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wiederman, M. W. (2005). The gendered nature of sexual scripts. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 13(4), 496–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty Jr., A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The "challenge hypothesis": theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. American Naturalist, 136(6), 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zimet, G., Dahlem, N., Zimet, S., & Farley, G. (1988). The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily R. Dibble
    • 1
  • Katherine L. Goldey
    • 2
  • Sari M. van Anders
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Behavioral NeuroscienceSt. Edward’s UniversityAustinUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Psychology and Women’s StudiesUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations