Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical Decision Support Systems: Opportunities in Pediatric Patient Safety

  • Patient Safety (M Coffey, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of review

Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) are tools, ideally embedded within electronic health systems, that can facilitate clinicians utilizing best practices and individual patient data to improve outcomes. While various iterations of CDSS have existed for years (including on paper-based charting systems), the past decade has seen an explosion of these systems. This review highlights some recent trends in CDSS, including where improvement in patient outcomes was achieved, as well as areas where the benefits were not realized.

Recent findings

Overall, three categories of CDSS improving patient safety have been analyzed. These include reduction in adverse events relating to medications, helping facilitate antimicrobial stewardship, and the identification and treatment of pediatric sepsis. In each of these areas, CDSS has been generally shown to improve patient safety to varying degrees. Occasional studies have shown no improvement or worsening outcomes, although this is often due to poor training of clinicians with the technology rather than a flaw with the technology itself. Most CDSS research has been unable to show improvements in tangible outcomes such as mortality rates, but this is often secondary to the fact that these outcomes are rare in the pediatric context and thus showing improvements is challenging.

Summary

CDSS is a simple term to describe a heterogenous group of interventions, designed to improve patient care using technology. In this review, the evidence shows that it can improve adherence to antimicrobial guidelines, minimize medication errors, and improve identification of pediatric sepsis. Like any new system, when implemented cautiously, with ample time for education of staff and troubleshooting, it can improve patient safety; however, if not implemented with sufficient forethought, it may not improve safety and can indeed cause its own adverse events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, Gandhi T, Kittler A, Volk L, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the ... J Am Med Informatics Assoc [Internet]. 2003;10(6):523–30. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12925543.

  2. Ramnarayan P, Britto J. Paediatric clinical decision support systems. Arch Dis Child. 2002;87:361–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann CU, Kim GR. Computerized provider order entry and patient safety. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2006;53(6):1169–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods D, Thomas E, Holl J, Altman S, Brennan T. Adverse events and preventable adverse events in children. Pediatrics. 2005;115(1):155–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Impicciatore P, Choonara I, Clarkson A, Provasi D, Pandolfini C, Bonati M. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in paediatric in/out-patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001;52(1):77–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Warrick C, Naik H, Avis S, Fletcher P, Franklin BD, Inwald D. A clinical information system reduces medication errors in paediatric intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(4):691–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Rosse F, Maat B, Rademaker CMA, Van Vught AJ, Egberts ACG, Bollen CW. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009;123(4):1184–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Upperman JS, Staley P, Friend K, Neches W, Kazimer D, Benes J, et al. The impact of hospitalwide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospital. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(1):57–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Han YY, Carcillo JA, Venkataraman ST, Clark RSB, Watson RS, Nguyen TC, et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):1506–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Del Beccaro MA, Jeffries HE, Eisenberg MA, Harry ED. Computerized provider order entry implementation: no association with increased mortality rates in an intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 2006;118(1):290–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keene A, Ashton L, Shure D, Napoleone D, Katyal C, Bellin E. Mortality before and after initiation of a computerized physician order entry system in a critically ill pediatric population. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(3):268–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadmon G, Bron-Harlev E, Nahum E, Schiller O, Haski G, Shonfeld T. Computerized order entry with limited decision support to prevent prescription errors in a PICU. Pediatrics. 2009;124(3):935–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Benjamin L, Frush K, Shaw K, Shook JE, Snow SK. Pediatric medication safety in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2018;141(3) This review highlights the top areas of improvement in the care of children in the emergency department. The opportunities for improving medication safety focus on weight-based dosing, standardized dosing, the optimization of computerized physician order entry using clinical decision support, and enhancing training across all medical professions in the systematic dispensing and administering of medications in the ED.

  14. Wong ICK, Wong LYL, Cranswick NE. Minimising medication errors in children. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(2):161–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaw KN, Lillis KA, Ruddy RM, Mahajan P V., Lichenstein R, Olsen CS, Chamberlain JM, for the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network Reported medication events in a paediatric emergency research network: sharing to improve patient safety. Emerg Med J 2013;30(10):815–819.

  16. Jani YH, Barber N, Wong ICK. Republished error management: paediatric dosing errors before and after electronic prescribing. Postgrad Med J. 2011;87(1030):565–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Conroy S, North C, Fox T, Haines L, Planner C, Erskine P, et al. Educational interventions to reduce prescribing errors. Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(4):313–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wong ICK, Ghaleb MA, Franklin BD, Barber N. Incidence and nature of dosing errors in paediatric medications: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2004;27(9):661–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patient Safety Observatory. Safety in doses: medication safety incidents in the NHS. Natl Patient Saf Agency [Internet]. 2007;9–12. Available from: http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?EntryId45=59822

  20. National Patient Safety Agency. Rapid response report NPSA/2010/RRR009: reducing harm from omitted and delayed medicines in hospital. 2010;(February):1–14.

  21. Lehmann CU, Kim GR, Gujral R, Veltri MA, Clark JS, Miller MR. Decreasing errors in pediatric continuous intravenous infusions. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006;7(3):225–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sethuraman U, Kannikeswaran N, Murray KP, Zidan MA, Chamberlain JM. Prescription errors before and after introduction of electronic medication alert system in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(6):714–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. • Donà D, Barbieri E, Daverio M, Lundin R, Giaquinto C, Zaoutis T. et al.Implementation and impact of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs: a systematic scoping review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2020;9:3 This review assesses the implementation of pediatric antimicrobial stewardship programs and the associated improvements in health outcomes. Pediatric ASPs have a significant impact on antimicrobial use, healthcare cost, and antimicrobial resistance in both inpatient and outpatient settings. It continues to be of interest how more data collection and coordination between systems will lead to more precise effects on healthcare systems and as a result, patient care.

  24. Webber EC, Warhurst HM, Smith SS, Cox EG, Crumby AS, Nichols KR. Conversion of a single-facility pediatric antimicrobial stewardship program to multi-facility application with computerized provider order entry and clinical decision support. Appl Clin Inform. 2013;4(4):556–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hum RS, Cato K, Sheehan B, Patel S, Duchon J, DeLaMora P, et al. Developing clinical decision support within a commercial electronic health record system to improve antimicrobial prescribing in the neonatal ICU. Appl Clin Inform. 2014;5(2):368–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Forrest CB, Fiks AG, Bailey LC, Localio R, Grundmeier RW, Richards T, et al. Improving adherence to otitis media guidelines with clinical decision support and physician feedback. Pediatrics. 2013;131(4).

  27. Mainous AG, Lambourne CA, Nietert PJ. Impact of a clinical decision support system on antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: quasi-experimental trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(2):317–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Litvin CB, Ornstein SM, Wessell AM, Nemeth LS, Nietert PJ. Use of an electronic health record clinical decision support tool to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections: the ABX-TRIP study. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(6):810–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Linder JA, Schnipper JL, Tsurikova R, Yu T, Volk LA, Melnikas AJ, et al. Documentation-based clinical decision support to improve antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory infections in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Inform Prim Care. 2009;17(4):231–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mostaghim M, Snelling T, McMullan B, Ewe YH, Bajorek B. Impact of clinical decision support on empirical antibiotic prescribing for children with community-acquired pneumonia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2019;55(3):305–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. • Le S, Hoffman J, Barton C, Fitzgerald JC, Allen A, Pellegrini E, et al. Pediatric severe sepsis prediction using machine learning. Front Pediatr. 2019;7(October):1–8 This study investigates the use of machine learning in detecting sepsis compared with traditional scoring methods and finds that the former demonstrates superior performance in predicting severe sepsis onset. The system utilizing machine learning performed superior to PELOD-2 at 1 and 4h pre-onset and superior to SIRS at 0, 1, and 4h pre-onset, and excelled in other metrics as well. The early identification and subsequent treatment of pediatric of sepsis is essential in improving patient outcomes.

  32. • Das C, Lucia MS HK and TJ. Improving recognition of pediatric severe sepsis in the emergency department: contributions of a vital sign based electronic alert and bedside clinician identification. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(6):759–768.e2. This quality improvement intervention conducted in a pediatric ED evaluated the performance of a sepsis recognition process including an electronic sepsis alert and bedside assessment. The alert demonstrated good sensitivity and high specificity for severe sepsis and when clinician identification was integrated for the patients that were negative for an alert, sensitivity improved.

  33. Weiss SL, Fitzgerald JC, Balamuth F, Alpern ER, Lavelle J, Chilutti M, et al. Delayed antimicrobial therapy increases mortality and organ dysfunction duration in pediatric sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(11):2409–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Joe Brierley, MD, Joseph A. Carcillo, MD, Karen Choong, MD, Tim Cornell, MD, Allan DeCaen, MD, Andreas Deymann, MD, Allan Doctor, MD, Alan Davis, MD, John Duff, MD, Marc-Andre Dugas, MD, Alan Duncan, MD, Barry Evans, MD, Jonathan Feldman, MD, Kathryn Felm J. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock Am Coll Crit Care Med 2015;40(2):1291–1296.

  35. Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, Deymann AJ, Lin JC, Nguyen TC, et al. The American College of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: executive summary. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(9):884–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Balamuth F, Alpern ER, Grundmeier RW, Chilutti M, Weiss SL, Fitzherald JC, et al. Comparison of two sepsis recognition methods in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(11):1298–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sepanski RJ, Godambe SA, Mangum CD, Bovat CS, Zaritsky AL, Shah SH. Designing a pediatric severe sepsis screening tool. Front Pediatr. 2014;2(JUN).

  38. Cruz AT, Williams EA, Graf JM, Perry AM, Harbin DE, Wuestner ER, et al. Test characteristics of an automated age- and temperature-adjusted tachycardia alert in pediatric septic shock. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28(9):889–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Vidrine RM, Zackoff M, Pfeiffer S, Paff Z, Seger B, Stalets E, et al. Predicting severe sepsis in the pediatric ICU. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019;4(3):e155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mithal LB, Yogev R, Palac HL, Kaminsky D, Gur I, Mestan KK. Vital signs analysis algorithm detects inflammatory response in premature infants with late onset sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis. Early Hum Dev. 2018;117(312):83–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gur I, Markel G, Nave Y, Vainshtein I, Eisenkraft A, Riskin A. A mathematical algorithm for detection of late-onset sepsis in very-low birth weight infants: 2014;51:647–650.

  42. Jani YH, Barber N, Wong ICK. Characteristics of clinical decision support alert overrides in an electronic prescribing system at a tertiary care paediatric hospital. Int J Pharm Pract. 2011;19(5):363–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Stultz JS, Nahata MC. Appropriateness of commercially available and partially customized medication dosing alerts among pediatric patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(E2):35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kirkendall ES, Andrew Spooner S, Logan JR. Evaluating the accuracy of electronic pediatric drug dosing rules. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014;21(E2).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Medical Sciences Building, 1 King’s College Cir, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada

    Nelson Saddler BSc, MSc, MD(c), Greg Harvey MD, FRCPC, Karim Jessa MD, FRCPC & Daniel Rosenfield B.Arts.Sc, MD, MHI, FRCPC

  2. Division of Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, 525 University Avenue, 12th Floor, Toronto, ON, M5G 2L3, Canada

    Greg Harvey MD, FRCPC & Daniel Rosenfield B.Arts.Sc, MD, MHI, FRCPC

  3. Division of Information Management Technology, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, M5G1X8, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Karim Jessa MD, FRCPC

Authors
  1. Nelson Saddler BSc, MSc, MD(c)
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Greg Harvey MD, FRCPC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karim Jessa MD, FRCPC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daniel Rosenfield B.Arts.Sc, MD, MHI, FRCPC
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Rosenfield B.Arts.Sc, MD, MHI, FRCPC.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Patient Safety

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saddler, N., Harvey, G., Jessa, K. et al. Clinical Decision Support Systems: Opportunities in Pediatric Patient Safety. Curr Treat Options Peds 6, 325–335 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-020-00206-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40746-020-00206-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation