Advertisement

Current Treatment Options in Pediatrics

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 151–173 | Cite as

Urodynamics in the Pediatric Patient: When to Order, How to Interpret

  • Elizabeth C. Jackson
Urology (P Reddy and B Vanderbrink, Section Editors)
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Urology

Abstract

Purpose of the review

The goal of this review is to elucidate the role of urodynamics in the assessment and management of lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction in children.

Recent findings

Many children with LUT dysfunction will improve with an explanation of bladder and bowel function, advice on fluid intake and bathroom schedules, and treatment of constipation. Among those who fail to respond, urodynamics may be useful in guidance. There are four types of urodynamic studies: non-invasive urodynamics, uroflow, invasive urodynamics, and videourodynamics. This review outlines the information that can be obtained from these studies. Biofeedback is a non-invasive urodynamic technique which involves the visualization of LUT function to teach the child control over these muscles particularly the pelvic floor muscle. In the absence of success, other options are available for LUT management.

Summary

Patterns of non-invasive urodynamics can be helpful in diagnosing and planning care for children with LUT dysfunction particularly if the pattern is consistent with history and home bladder diaries. Many diagnoses respond to pelvic floor exercises taught by biofeedback. Constipation plays a large role in LUT dysfunction and may respond to diet, medication, and biofeedback. More invasive testing and treatment is available for the few who do not respond.

Keywords

Non-invasive urodynamics Urodynamics in children Dysfunctional voiding Overactive bladder Lower urinary tract dysfunction 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

Elizabeth C. Jackson declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

References and Recommended Reading

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. 1.
    Benarroch EE. Neural control of the bladder, recent advances and neurologic implications. Neurology. 2010;75(20):1839–46.  https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fdabba.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    • Franco I. The central nervous system and its role in bowel and bladder control. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(2):153–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-010-0167-8. An older article but the CNS has still not been explored enough as a source of LUT dysfunction.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    •• Austin PF, Bauer SB, Bower W, Chase J, Franco I, Hoebeke P, et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function in children and adolescents: update report from the standardization committee of the international children’s continence society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35(4):471–48.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22751. Very informative article about LUT function, evaluation, treatment, and how to measure success.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Franco I. Functional bladder problems in children: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Pediatr Clin N Am. 2012;59(4):783–817.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2012.05.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hoebeke P, Bower W, Combs A, de Jong T, Yang S. Diagnostic evaluation of children with daytime incontinence. J Urol. 2010;183(2):699–703.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.038.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Joensson IM, Siggaard C, Rittig S, Hagstroem S, Djurhuus JC. Transabdominal ultrasound of rectum as a diagnostic tool in childhood constipation. J Urol. 2008;179(5):1997–2002.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang SJ, Chiang IN, Hsieh CH, Lin CD, Yang SSD. Age- and gender-specific nomograms for single and dual post-void residual urine in healthy children. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(7):1014–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Gool JD, Hjälmås K, et al. Historical clues to the complex of dysfunctional voiding, urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux—the International Reflux Study in Children. J Urol. 1992;148(5):1699–702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37006-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sureshkumar P, Craig JC, et al. A reproducible pediatric daytime urinary incontinence questionnaire. J Urol. 2001;165(2):569–73.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-200102000-00072.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koff SA. Estimating bladder capacity in children. Urology. 1983;21(3):248.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(83)90079-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rittig S, Kamperis K, Siggaard C, Hagstroem S, Djurhuus JC. Age related nocturnal urine volume and maximum voided volume in healthy children: reappraisal of International Children’s Continence Society definitions. J Urol. 2010;183(4):1561–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Farhat W, Bagli DJ, Capolicchio G, et al. The dysfunctional voiding scoring system: quantitative standardization of dysfunctional voiding symptoms in children. J Urol. 2000;164(3):1011–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67239-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bower WF, Sit FK, Bluyssen N, et al. Pin Q: a valid, reliable and reproducible quality-of-life measure in children with bladder dysfunction. J Pediatr Urol. 2006;2(3):185–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2005.07.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang SS, Chang S-J. Uroflowmetry in children can be simply classified as normal or abnormal pattern. Urol Sci. 2010;21(3):142–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1879-5226(10)60031-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    •• Clothier JC, Wright AJ. Dysfunctional voiding: the importance of non-invasive urodynamics in diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2017;  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-017-3679-3. Excellent article about this common condition from mild to severe, how to diagnose, and how to treat.
  16. 16.
    Chiarioni G, Salandini L, Whitehead W. Biofeedback benefits only patients with outlet dysfunction, not patients with isolated slow transit constipation. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(1):86–97.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.05.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    deJong TPVM, Klijn AJ, et al. Effect of biofeedback training on paradoxical pelvic floor movement in children with dysfunctional voiding. Urology. 2007;70(4):790–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Batavia JPV, Combs AJ, et al. Primary bladder neck dysfunction in children and adolescents III: results of long-term alpha blocker therapy. J Urol. 2010;183(2):724–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Szabo L, Fegverneki S. Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal children—the Miskolc nomograms. Br J Urol. 1995;76(1):16–20.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07824.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yeh C-H, Hwang TI-S, Chiang H-S. Is OAB different from bladder hypersensitivity and detrusor overactivity. Incont Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;2(Suppl 1):5–6.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoebeke P, Raes A, Vande Walle J, van Laecke E. Urodynamics in children: what and how to do it? Acta Urol Belg. 1998;66(2):23–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bauer SB. Pediatric urodynamics: lower tract. In: O’Donnell B, Koff SA, editors. Pediatric urology. Oxford: Butterworth–Heineman; 1998. p. 125–51.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaufman MR, DeMarco RT, Pope JC IV, Scarpero HM, Adams MC, Trusler LA, et al. High yield of urodynamics performed for refractory nonneurogenic dysfunctional voiding in the pediatric population. J Urol. 2006;176(4):1835–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.03.125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    •• Ross S, Wiener J. Practical urodynamics in children. In: Peterson AC, Fraser MO, editors. Practical urodynamics for the clinician. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. p. 143–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20834-3_13. Just as it says—practical.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bauer SB. Neurogenic bladder: etiology and assessment. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008;23(4):541–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-008-0764-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McGuire EJ, Woodside JR, Borden TA, Weiss RM. Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol. 1981;126(2):205–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)54449-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tarcan T, Sekerci CA, Akbal C, Tinay I, Tanidir Y, Sahan A, et al. Is 40 cm H2O detrusor leak point pressure cut-off reliable for upper urinary tract protection in children with myelodysplasia? Neurourol Urodynam. 2017;36(3):759–63.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    DeFoor WR, Jenkins TM, et al. Prospective evaluation of urinary incontinence in severely obese adolescents presenting for weight loss surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017; Accepted for publication, 7/2017;  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.09.510.
  29. 29.
    Goldstick O, Constantini N. Urinary incontinence in physically active women. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(4):296–8.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091880.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Linsenmeyer TA. Panel chair for consortium for spinal cord medicine clinical practice guidelines. Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29:527–73.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Szabo L, Lombay B, et al. Videourodynamics in the diagnosis of urinary tract abnormalities in a single center. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19(3):326–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-003-1341-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Soygur T, Arikan N, Tokatli Z, Karaboga R. The role of video-urodynamic studies in managing nonneurogenic voiding dysfunction in children. BJU Int. 2004;93(6):841–3.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04734.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yeung CK. Pathophysiology of bladder dysfunction. In: Gearhart JP, Rink RC, Mouriquand PDE, editors. Pediatric urology. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2001. p. 453–69.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kajbafzadeh AM, Sharifi-Rad L, Ghahestani SM, Ahmadi H, Kajbafzadeh M, Mahboubi AH. Animated biofeedback: an ideal treatment for children with dysfunctional elimination syndrome. J Urol. 2011;186(6):2379–85.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Desantis DJ, Leonard MP, Preston MA, Barrowman NJ, Guerra LA. Effectiveness of biofeedback for dysfunctional elimination syndrome in pediatrics: a systematic review. J Ped Urol. 2011;7(3):342–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vasconcelos M, Lima E, Caiafa L, Noronha A, Cangussu R, Gomes S, et al. Voiding dysfunction in children. Pelvic-floor exercises or biofeedback therapy: a randomized study. Pediatr Nephrol. 2006;21(12):1858–364.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-006-0277-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schulman SL, Von Zuben FC, et al. Biofeedback methodology: does it matter how we teach children how to relax the pelvic floor during voiding? J Urol. 2001;166(6):2423–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65607-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Herndon CD, Decambre M, McKenna PH. Interactive computer games for treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1893–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65714-X.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kaye JD, Palmer LS. Animated biofeedback yields more rapid results than nonanimated biofeedback in the treatment of dysfunctional voiding in girls. J Urol. 2008;180(1):300–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.078.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ramsay S, Bolduc S. Overactive bladder in children. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(1-2Suppl1):S74–9.  https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4337.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Blais A-S, Nadeau G, Moore K, Genois L, Bolduc S. Prospective pilot study of mirabegron in pediatric patients with overactive bladder. Eur Urol. 2016;70(1):9–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.••
    Muller AE, Verhaegh EM, Harbarth S, Mouton JW, Huttner A. Nitrofurantoin’s efficacy and safety as prophylaxis for urinary tract infections: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of controlled trials. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23(6):355–62. My personal favorite for UTI prophylaxis.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2016.08.003. This article tells the good, the bad, and the ugly.
  43. 43.
    Dwyer ME, Vandersteen DR, Hollatz P, Reinberg YE. Sacral neuromodulation for the dysfunctional elimination syndrome: a 10-year single-center experience with 105 consecutive children. Urology. 2014;84(4):911–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.059.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mason MD, Stephany HA, Casella DP, Clayton DB, Tanaka ST, Thomas JC, et al. Prospective evaluation of sacral neuromodulation in children: outcomes and urodynamic predictors of success. J Urol. 2016;195(4):1239–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.11.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hagstroem S, Mahler B, Madsen B, Djurhuus JC, Rittig S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for refractory daytime urinary urge incontinence. J Urol. 2009;182(4):2072–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sillen U, Arwidsson C, et al. Effects of transcutaneous neuromodulation (TENS) on overactive bladder symptoms in children: a randomized controlled trial. J Ped Urol. 2014;10(6):1100–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.03.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    •• Borch L, Hagstroem S, Kamperis K, Siggaard CV, Rittig S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with oxybutynin is superior to monotherapy in children with urge incontinence: a randomized, placebo controlled study. J Urol. 2017;198(2):430–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.117. Combination therapy may be particularly useful.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Greer T, Abbott J, Breytenbach W, McGuane D, Barker A, Khosa J, et al. Ten years of experience with intravesical and intrasphincteric onabotulinumtoxin A in children. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(2):94.e1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.06.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Khan MK, Vanderbrink BA, et al. Botulinum toxin injection in the pediatric population with medically refractory neuropathic bladder. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(2):104.e1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.08.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tiryaki S, Yagmur I, Parlar Y, Ozel K, Akyildiz C, Avanoglu A, et al. Botulinum injection is useless on fibrotic neuropathic bladders. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(1):27e1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.08.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Burgers R, Liem O, Canon S, Mousa H, Benninga MA, di Lorenzo C, et al. Effect of rectal distention on lower urinary tract function in children. J Urol. 2010;184(4):1680–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.120.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Divisions of Nephrology and UrologyCincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical CenterCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations