Using Information Technology to Improve the Quality of Pediatric Healthcare
Purpose of the review
Purpose of the review The goal of this article is to provide the reader an up-to-date overview of the role that health information technology (HIT) plays in modern-day healthcare quality improvement (QI) work and processes. The reader should be able to understand the unique benefits and challenges that HIT can impart on QI efforts, as well as calibrate their expectations appropriately. Examples will be grounded in recent informatics evidence and standard practices.
Recent findings Technology has been shown to an effective enabler and potentiator for quality improvement in initiatives and programs such as population health management, research, and QI networks, and minimizing use of unproven therapies (e.g., unindicated antibiotics), for example. HIT challenges remain that can limit this positive effect, including data management and quality issues, technical interoperability barriers, and the general nature of quality reporting as it exists today.
Summary Information technology in the form of electronic health records and other systems are ubiquitous and powerful enablers of quality improvement efforts in healthcare. When these digital tools are applied according to best practices and in an evidence-based manner, they can have profound impacts on both quality improvement processes and outcomes. Technology and the general healthcare environment are rapidly changing, though, and further study of the intersection of HIT and QI will continue to inform us of the real promise and pitfalls of this intersection.
KeywordsHealth information technology Quality improvement Electronic health record Electronic medical record
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Eric Kirkendall declares that he has no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
References and Recommended Reading
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:• Of importance •• Of major importance
- 1.Services HaH. HITECH Act Enforcement Interim Final Rule. 2017. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/HITECH-act-enforcement-interim-final-rule/index.html. Accessed 28 Aug 2017.
- 2.• Adler-Milstein J, Jha AK. HITECH act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017;36(8):1416–22. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1651. This article highights and directly attributes EHR adoption gains to the HITECH ActCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) DpoHaHS. Health information technology: initial set of standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for electronic health record technology. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2010;75(144):44589–654.Google Scholar
- 4.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) HHS. Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2010;75(144):44313–588.Google Scholar
- 7.Kirkendall ES, Goldenhar LM, Simon JL, Wheeler DS, Andrew Spooner S. Transitioning from a computerized provider order entry and paper documentation system to an electronic health record: expectations and experiences of hospital staff. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(11):1037–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.005. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kaushal R, Barker KN, Bates DW. How can information technology improve patient safety and reduce medication errors in children’s health care? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. vol 9. United States 2001. p. 1002–7.Google Scholar
- 19.• Nelson EC, Dixon-Woods M, Batalden PB, Homa K, Van Citters AD, Morgan TS, et al. Patient focused registries can improve health, care, and science. BMJ. 2016;354:i3319. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3319. Publication highlights the potential of registries, their functions, and how they feed quality improvement effortsCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Fleurence RL, Curtis LH, Califf RM, Platt R, Selby JV, Brown JS. Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2014;21(4):578–82. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002747. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.•• Billett AL, Colletti RB, Mandel KE, Miller M, Muething SE, Sharek PJ, et al. Exemplar pediatric collaborative improvement networks: achieving results. Pediatrics. 2013;131(Suppl 4):S196–203. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-3786F.Report on exemplar pediatric-specific QI networks and their resultsCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Lyren A, Brilli RJ, Zieker K, Marino M, Muething S, Sharek PJ. Children’s Hospitals’ solutions for patient safety collaborative impact on hospital-acquired harm. Pediatrics. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3494.
- 41.King A, Cresswell KM, Coleman JJ, Pontefract SK, Slee A, Williams R, et al. Investigating the ways in which health information technology can promote antimicrobial stewardship: a conceptual overview. J R Soc Med. 2017;110(8):320–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076817722049. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Chung P, Scandlyn J, Dayan PS, Mistry RD. Working at the intersection of context, culture, and technology: provider perspectives on antimicrobial stewardship in the emergency department using electronic health record clinical decision support. Am J Infect Control. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.06.005.
- 43.Akpan MR, Ahmad R, Shebl NA, Ashiru-Oredope DA. Review of quality measures for assessing the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals. Antibiotics (Basel). 2016;5(1) https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics5010005.
- 49.Dykes D, Williams E, Margolis P, Ruschman J, Bick J, Saeed S, et al. Improving pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) follow-up. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016;5(1) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u208961.w3675.
- 50.Savarino JR, Kaplan JL, Winter HS, Moran CJ, Israel EJ. Improving clinical remission rates in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease with previsit planning. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016;5(1) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u211063.w4361.
- 54.• Shah AY, LL K, Dougherty D, Cha S, Conway PH. State challenges to child health quality measure reporting and recommendations for improvement. Healthc (Amst). 2016;4(3):217–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.03.001.Important publication from national leaders on quality improvement that demonstrate quality reporting, while a high priority to most state-level stakeholders, is challenging and time- and resource-consumingCrossRefGoogle Scholar