Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Adapted Questionnaire of Work Motivation for People Living with Chronic Mental Disorders” (CAMT): Validation in Mexican People with Bipolar Disorder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Job performance is one of the most challenging aspects faced by people living with chronic mental disorders. It has been observed that good performance in this area could aid in improving both clinical and psychosocial situations. Theoretical models have considered work motivation as one of the predictor variables of success in getting and keeping a job. In the field of mental health there are few instruments for measuring work motivation, therefore the objective of this study was to report the psychometric properties of the Adapted Questionnaire of Work Motivation for People Living with a Chronic Mental Disorder (“Cuestionario Adaptado de Motivación para el Trabajo” or CAMT) in a sample of Mexican subjects diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The CAMT was applied to 157 subjects; the discrimination index, reliability, and construct validity were evaluated; and cut-off points were calculated. This study was approved by local ethics and research committees. Only two items produced a discrimination index lower than the reference point suggested in the literature. A four-factor solution was obtained, and a Kuder-Richardson coefficient of 0.821 was observed on the general scale. More than 90% of the sample was distributed within the normal values of the four subscales. The Mexican version of the CAMT is a reliable instrument to evaluate work motivation in people with bipolar disorder. More studies are needed to increase knowledge about the performance of the questionnaire in other populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cohen, R. J. & Swerdlik, M. E. (2001). Pruebas y evaluación psicológicas. Introducción a las pruebas y a la medición. Mc Graw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J. A. (2006). Employment barriers for persons with psychiatric disabilities: update of a report for the president’s commission. Psychiatric Services, 57(10), 1391–1405. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2006.57.10.1391

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crocker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt Rinehart and Winston.

  • Gagné, M., Forest, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Crevier-Braud, L., Van den Broeck, A., Aspeli, A. K., Aspeli, A. K., Bellerose, J., Benabou, C., Chemolli, E., Günter, S.T., Halvari, H., Indiyastuti, D. L., Johnson, P. A., Molstad, M. H., Naudin, M., Ndao, A., Olafsen, A.H., Roussel, P., Wanh, Z. & Westbye, C. (2018). The Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 178–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García, J. (2018). Entornos inherentes al desempeño laboral de los trabajadores con discapacidad en México. DIKE Revista de Investigación en Derecho, Criminología y Consultoría Jurídica, 12(24), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.32399/rdk.12.24.754

  • Gülsum, T. & Zekiye, C. (2020). Needs of Individuals with Chronic Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review. Current Approaches in Psychiatry, 2(12), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.530945

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (2020). Censo de Población y Vivienda 2021. http://cuentame.inegi.org.mx/monografias/informacion/df/poblacion/educacion.aspx?tema=me

  • Hurtado-Modomeño, L. L. (2018). Relación entre los índices de dificultad y discriminación. Revista Digital de Investigación en Docencia Universitaria, 12(1), 273–300. https://doi.org/10.19083/ridu.12.614

  • Jung, S. & Lee, S. (2011). Exploratory factor analysis for small samples. B43ehavior Research Methods, : 701–709. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0077-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanfer, R., Chen, G. & Pritchard, R.D. (2008). The three C’s of work motivation: Content, context, and changeen R. Kanfer, G. Chen & R. D. Pritchard (Eds.), Work motivation: Past, present and future (pp. 1–16). Routledge.

  • Lee, M. T. & Raschke, R. L. (2016). Understanding employee motivation and organizational performance: arguments for a set-theoretic approach. Journal of Innovation & Knowledges, 1(3), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield, P., Cooper, C., Hancock, C. & Watt, P. (2016). Work and wellbeing in the 21st century. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(11), 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13111065

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • López-Menéndez, L. Á. (2008). Predictores del desempeño laboral de personas con discapacidad por trastorno mental severo. Revisión de estudios y análisis de evidencias. Intervención Psicosocial, 17(3), 245–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R., Widaman, K., Zhang, S. & Hong, Y. (1999). Sample Size in Factor Analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Camarillo, S., Yoldi-Negrete, M., Fresán-Orellana, A., Ortega-Ortíz, H. & Becerra-Palars, C. (2019). International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 0. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764019842270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marwaha, S., Durrani, A., & Singh, S. (2013). Employment outcomes in people with bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 128(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascayano, F., Lips, W. & Moreno, J. M. (2013). Estrategias de inserción laboral en población con discapacidad mental: Una revisión. Salud Mental. 36(2), 159–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondragón, L. (2009). Consentimiento informado: Una praxis dialógica para la investigación. Revista de Investigación Clínica, 61(1), 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. J. (1995). Teoría Psicométrica (3rd edn.). McGraw-Hill.

  • Pascual, T., Lopez, M. & Coy, P. (1998).Fiabilización del cuestionario adaptado de motivación para el trabajo para enfermos mentales crónicos. IntervenciónPsicocosocial, 7(1), 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C. (2015).Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior (2th edn.). Psychology Press.

  • Preacher, K. J. & MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift's electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328031US0201_02

  • Rymaszewska, J. & Mazurek, J. (2012). The social and occupational functioning of outpatients from mental health services. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 21(2), 215–223.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tohen, M., Frank, E., Bowden, C. L., Colom, F., Ghaemi, S. N.,Yatham, L., Malhi, G. S., Calabrese, J. R., Noles, W. A., Vieta, E., Kapczinski, F., Goodwin, G. M., Suppes, T., Sachs, G. S., Chengappa, K. R., Grunze, H., Mitchell, P. B., Kanba, S. & Berk, M. (2009). The International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD). Task force report on the nomenclature of course and outcome in bipolar disorders. Bipolar Disorders, 11(5), 453–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2009.00726

  • Tremblay, M. A., Blanchard, C. M., Taylor, S., Pelletier, L. G. & Villeneuve, M. (2009). Work Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 41(4), 213–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167

  • Tse, S., Chan, S., Ng, K. L. & Yatham, L. N. (2014). Meta-analysis of predictors of favorable employment outcomes among individuals with bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 16(3), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/bdi.12148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Widaman, K. F. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysisen H. Cooper (Ed.). APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 361–389). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13621-018

  • Word Health Organization (2001). Clasificación Internacional de Funcionamiento, Discapacidad y Salud. Disponible en: https://aspace.org/assets/uploads/publicaciones/e74e4-cif_2001.pdf

  • Zweifel, P. (2012). Mental Health: The burden of social stigma. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 36(3), 813–825. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram Ortega-Ortiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zapata-Téllez, J., Martínez-Camarillo, S., Becerra-Palars, C. et al. The Adapted Questionnaire of Work Motivation for People Living with Chronic Mental Disorders” (CAMT): Validation in Mexican People with Bipolar Disorder. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health 9, 357–366 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-022-00272-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-022-00272-w

Keywords

Navigation