Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Electrochemical Potential on Tribocorrosion Behaviour of AISI 420

  • Published:
Journal of Bio- and Tribo-Corrosion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of different electrochemical potentials on the tribocorrosive behaviour of AISI 420 in simulated body fluid (37 °C, 0.15 M NaCl solution) were studied, using a ball-on-disc tribometer under potentiostatic control. Results indicated a strong dependence of the material loss and degradation mechanisms on the applied potential. Cathodic polarization led to the lowest material loss, which was attributed to the electrochemical removal and mechanical destruction of the passive layer, resulting in a low corrosive degradation and strong adhesion. During polarization at the equilibriums between cathodic and anodic reactions, maximum material loss was observed. This was attributed to galvanic coupling between the wear track and the surrounding surface, which resulted in a high electrochemical degradation, that was maintained by continuous mechanical destruction of the passive layer. At potentials in the passive region, a lower material loss was observed. This is considered to be caused by faster repassivation and higher stability of the passive layer, which inhibits electrochemical degradation and impedes the formation of adhesion contacts. According to the results, the greatest material destruction occurs in between cathodic or anodic polarisation, which is common during the use of products like surgical instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Landolt D, Mischler S (2011) Tribocorrosion of passive metals and coatings. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan Y (2013) Bio-tribocorrosion in biomaterials and medical implants. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  3. Menezes PL, Ingole SP et al (2013) Tribology for scientists and engineers. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Wood R (2007) Tribo-corrosion of coatings: a review. J Phys D Appl Phys. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/18/S10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dalmau A, Richard C, Igual-Munoz A (2018) Degradation mechanisms in martensitic stainless steels: wear, corrosion and tribocorrosion appraisal. Tribol Int 121:167–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2018.01.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mischler S, Spiegel A, Landolt D (1999) The role of passive oxide films on the degradation of steel in tribocorrosion systems. Wear 225–229:1078–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00056-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yin C, Liang Y, Jiang Y, Yang M, Long S (2017) Formation of nano-laminated structures in a dry sliding wear-induced layer under different wear mechanisms of 20CrNi2Mo steel. Appl Surf Sci 423:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalmau A, Rmili W, Richard C, Igual-Munoz A (2016) Tribocorrosion behavior of new martensitic stainless steels in sodium chloride solution. Wear 368–369:146–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2016.09.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Boese E, Röthig J, Garz I, Schmidtchen H (1998) Tribokorrosion von nichtrostenden Stählen. Mater Corros 49:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-4176(199802)49:2%3C98::AID-MACO98%3E3.0.CO;2-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Watson SW, Friedersdorf FJ, Madsen BW, Cramer SD (1995) Methods of measuring wear-corrosion synergism. Wear 181–183:476–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)90161-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mischler S (2008) Triboelectrochemical techniques and interpretation methods in tribocorrosion: A comparative evaluation. Tribol Int 41:573–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2007.11.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang BB, Wang JZ, Zhang Y, Han GF, Yan FY (2017) Tribocorrosion behavior of 410SS in artificial seawater: effect of applied potential. Mater Corros 68:295–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201609119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Olsson COA, Landolt D (2003) Passive films on stainless steels - chemistry, structure and growth. Electrochim Acta 48:1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00841-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun Y, Rana V (2011) Tribocorrosion behaviour of AISI 304 stainless steel in 0.5 M NaCl solution. Mater Chem Phys 129:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.03.063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang B, Wang J, Zhang Y, Han G, Yan F (2016) Comparison of tribocorrosion behaviour between 304 austenitic and 410 martensitic stainless steels in artificial seawater. RSC Adv 6:107933–107941. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA18497A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bidiville A, Favero M, Stadelmann P, Mischler S (2007) Effect of surface chemestry on the mechanical response of metals in sliding tribocorrossion systems. Wear 263:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2007.01.066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun Y, Haruman E (2011) Effect of electrochemical potential on tribocorrosion behavior of low temperature plasma carburized 316L stainless steel in 1 M H2SO4 solution. Surf Coat Technol 205:4280–4290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.03.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huttunen-Saarivirta E et al (2016) Tribocorrosion study of martensitic and austenitic stainless steels in 0.1 M NaCl solution. Tribol Int 95:358–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.11.046

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gassner A et al (2021) Tribocorrosion mechanisms of martensitic stainless steels. HTM J Heat Treat Mater 76:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/htm-2021-0004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greenish S et al (2002) Measurement, analysis and display of haptic signals during surgical cutting. Presence 11:626–651. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474602321050749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCafferty E (2010) Introduction to corrosion science. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diomidis N, Celis JP, Ponthiaux P, Wenger F (2009) A methodology for the assessment of the tribocorrosion of passivating metallic materials. Lubr Sci 21:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ls.73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dalbert V et al (2019) The effects of microstructures and repassivation kinetics on the tribocorrosion resistance of ferrite and ferrite-martensite stainless steels. Wear 420–421:245–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2018.10.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Favero M, Stadelmann P, Mischler S (2006) Effect of the applied potential of the near surface microstructure of a 316L steel submitted to tribocorrosion in sulfuric acid. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:3175–3183. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/39/15/S07

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grzeskiewicz R (1988) Effect of hydrogen on the coefficient of friction of iron. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pokhmurs’kyi VI, Vasyliv KB (2012) Influence of hydrogen on the friction and wear of metals (a survey). Mater Sci 48:125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-012-9482-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Siddiqui RA, Abdullah HA (2005) Hydrogen embrittlement in 0,31 % carbon steel used for petrochemical applications. J Mater Process Technol 170:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.05.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kheradmand N et al (2016) Effect of hydrogen on the hardness of different phases in super duplex stainless steel. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41:704–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Haupt S, Strehblow HH (1995) A combined surface analytical and electrochemical study of the formation of passive layers on Fe/Cr alloys in H2SO4. Corros Sci 37:43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(94)00104-E

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Z (2018) Microstructure evolution under tribological loading and its elementary mechanisms. Karlsruher Institut für Technologie Fakultät Maschinenbau. https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000085322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Battaile CC et al (2012) The hardness and strength of metal tribofilms: an apparent contradiction between nanoindentation and pillar compression. Acta Mater 60:1712–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang Y, Lei T, Liu J (1999) Tribo-metallographic behavior of high carbon steels in dry sliding—III. Dynamic microstructural changes and wear. Wear 231:20–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00117-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sikorski ME (1963) Correlation of the coefficient of adhesion with various physical and mechanical properties of metals. J Basic Eng. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3656577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sikorski ME (1964) The adhesion of metals and factors that influence it. Wear 7:144–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(64)90050-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mokhtar MOA, Zaki M, Shawki GSA (1980) Correlation between the frictional behaviour and the physical properties of metals. Wear 65:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(80)90004-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Stott FH, Wood GC (1978) The influence of oxides on the friction and wear of alloys, Veröffentlichung. Tribol Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(78)90178-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Anantha KH et al (2017) In situ AFM study of localized corrosion processes of tempered AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel: effect of secondary hardening. J Electrochem Soc 164:810–818. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1261713jes

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Anantha KH (2018) An experimental study to understand the localized corrosion and environment assisted cracking behavior of AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There were no research grants from any funding agencies for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Gassner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gassner, A., Conzelmann, A., Palkowski, H. et al. Effect of Electrochemical Potential on Tribocorrosion Behaviour of AISI 420. J Bio Tribo Corros 8, 80 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-022-00682-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-022-00682-0

Keywords

Navigation