Advertisement

Anodic Electrophoretic Deposition of Graphene Oxide on 316L Stainless Steel with pH-Dependent Microstructures

  • Geetisubhra Jena
  • S. C. Vanithakumari
  • C. Thinaharan
  • R. P. George
  • U. Kamachi Mudali
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Surface Modifications and Coatings

Abstract

This paper describes anodic electrophoretic deposition of graphene oxide (GO) on 316L SS with pH-dependent microstructures. GO flakes were synthesized by modified Hummers’ method. Detailed studies on structural characteristics, thermal stability, and elemental composition of the GO flakes were carried out using advanced characterization techniques. Results showed successful oxidation and exfoliation forming GO flakes that are hydrophilic in nature. Acidic (pH 3.4) and basic (pH 11) aqueous GO suspensions were prepared, and the zeta potential as well as the average particle size distribution of the suspensions was ascertained. The GO suspensions were exhibiting zeta potential values of −32.9 and −36.8 mV and average particle size of 1–2 µm and 800–900 nm at acidic pH of 3.4 and alkaline pH of 11, respectively. Using anodic electrophoretic deposition (EPD) methods, GO was coated on 316L SS substrate from acidic and alkaline suspension and coatings were characterized. The increased value of ID/IG by Raman spectra analysis, partial restoration of C = C skeleton in the de-convoluted C 1s XPS spectra analysis, and the presence of C–C and C–H stretching bands in ATR-FTIR spectra were correlated with partial reduction of GO during the deposition on 316L SS surface. Though there was no difference in the chemical composition of the coatings formed from the acidic and alkaline pH suspension, atomic force microscopy and field emission scanning electron microscopy characterization showed difference in topography and morphology of the coatings. 316L SS substrates coated with GO in acidic pH showed higher RMS and average roughness and dense agglomerated wrinkled microstructure compared to substrates coated with alkaline pH suspension. Again GO coating from acidic pH suspension showed hydrophobicity. The present study showed that the microstructures of the GO coatings on 316L SS can be tuned by varying the pH of the GO suspension during EPD process.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Graphene oxide Electrophoretic deposition (EPD) pH Zeta potential Microstructure Contact angle 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Mr. A.S. Suneesh, MC & MFCG, for zeta potential measurements, Mr. Shailesh Joshi, RSD, for FTIR and elemental analysis, Dr. Ch. Jagadeeswara Rao, CSTD, for thermogravimetric analysis, and Dr. Vani Shankar, MMD, IGCAR for FESEM. Ms. Geetisubhra Jena also expresses her gratitude to DAE for providing fellowship to carry out this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson DW, Dobson BP, Coleman KS (2015) A manufacturing perspective on graphene dispersions. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 20(5–6):367–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rao CE, Sood AE, Subrahmanyam KE, Govindaraj A (2009) Graphene: the new two-dimensional nanomaterial. Angew Chem Int Ed 48(42):7752–7777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang G, Wang B, Park J, Wang Y, Sun B, Yao J (2009) Highly efficient and large-scale synthesis of graphene by electrolytic exfoliation. Carbon 47(14):3242–3246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choucair M, Thordarson P, Stride JA (2009) Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nat Nanotechnol 4(1):30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang G, Yang J, Park J, Gou X, Wang B, Liu H, Yao J (2008) Facile synthesis and characterization of graphene nanosheets. J Phys Chem C 112(22):8192–8195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lerf A, He H, Forster M, Klinowski J (1998) Structure of graphite oxide revisited. J Phys Chem B 102(23):4477–4482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konkena B, Vasudevan S (2012) Understanding aqueous dispersibility of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide through p K a measurements. J Phys Chem Lett 3(7):867–872CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin CH, Yeh WT, Chan CH, Lin CC (2012) Influence of graphene oxide on metal-insulator-semiconductor tunneling diodes. Nanoscale Res Lett 7(1):343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pei S, Cheng HM (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon 50(9):3210–3228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bykkam S, Rao KV, Chakra CS, Thunugunta T (2013) Synthesis and characterization of graphene oxide and its antimicrobial activity against klebseilla and staphylococus. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res 4(1):142–146Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu S, Zeng TH, Hofmann M, Burcombe E, Wei J, Jiang R, Kong J, Chen Y (2011) Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: membrane and oxidative stress. ACS Nano 5(9):6971–6980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Akhavan O, Ghaderi E (2010) Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria. ACS Nano 4(10):5731–5736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Singh BP, Nayak S, Nanda KK, Jena BK, Bhattacharjee S, Besra L (2013) The production of a corrosion resistant graphene reinforced composite coating on copper by electrophoretic deposition. Carbon 61:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eda G, Fanchini G, Chhowalla M (2008) Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material. Nat Nanotechnol 3(5):270–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dumée LF, He L, Wang Z, Sheath P, Xiong J, Feng C, Tan MY, She F, Duke M, Gray S, Pacheco A (2015) Growth of nano-textured graphene coatings across highly porous stainless steel supports towards corrosion resistant coatings. Carbon 87:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhaviripudi S, Jia X, Dresselhaus MS, Kong J (2010) Role of kinetic factors in chemical vapor deposition synthesis of uniform large area graphene using copper catalyst. Nano Lett 10(10):4128–4133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng Q, Ip WH, Lin X, Yousefi N, Yeung KK, Li Z, Kim JK (2011) Transparent conductive films consisting of ultralarge graphene sheets produced by Langmuir–Blodgett assembly. ACS Nano 5(7):6039–6051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cote LJ, Kim F, Huang J (2008) Langmuir–Blodgett assembly of graphite oxide single layers. J Am Chem Soc 131(3):1043–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hasan SA, Rigueur JL, Harl RR, Krejci AJ, Gonzalo-Juan I, Rogers BR, Dickerson JH (2010) Transferable graphene oxide films with tunable microstructures. ACS Nano 4(12):7367–7372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    An SJ, Zhu Y, Lee SH, Stoller MD, Emilsson T, Park S, Velamakanni A, An J, Ruoff RS (2010) Thin film fabrication and simultaneous anodic reduction of deposited graphene oxide platelets by electrophoretic deposition. J Phys Chem Lett 1(8):1259–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chavez-Valdez A, Shaffer MS, Boccaccini AR (2012) Applications of graphene electrophoretic deposition: a review. J Phys Chem B 117(6):1502–1515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diba M, Garcia-Gallastegui A, Taylor RN, Pishbin F, Ryan MP, Shaffer MS, Boccaccini AR (2014) Quantitative evaluation of electrophoretic deposition kinetics of graphene oxide. Carbon 67:656–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang M, Duong LD, Oh JS, Mai NT, Kim S, Hong S, Hwang T, Lee Y, Nam JD (2014) Large-area, conductive and flexible reduced graphene oxide (RGO) membrane fabricated by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(3):1747–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park JH, Park JM (2014) Electrophoretic deposition of graphene oxide on mild carbon steel for anti-corrosion application. Surf Coat Technol 254:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hamaker HC (1940) Formation of a deposit by electrophoresis. Trans Faraday Soc 35:279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Eliaz N, Sridhar TM, Kamachi Mudali U, Raj B (2005) Electrochemical and electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite for orthopaedic applications. Surf Eng 21(3):238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ferguson SJ, Langhoff JD, Voelter K, Rechenberg BV, Scharnweber D, Bierbaum S, Schnabelrauch M, Kautz AR, Frauchiger VM, Mueller TL, van Lenthe GH (2008) Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23(6):1037–1046Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moravej M, Mantovani D (2011) Biodegradable metals for cardiovascular stent application: interests and new opportunities. Int J Mol Sci 12(7):4250–4270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shankar AR, Mudali UK, Sole R, Khatak HS, Raj B (2008) Plasma-sprayed yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings on type 316L stainless steel for pyrochemical reprocessing plant. J Nucl Mater 372(2–3):226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hummers WS Jr, Offeman RE (1958) Preparation of graphitic oxide. J Am Chem Soc 80(6):1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Oh WC, Zhang FJ (2011) Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide reduced from a mild chemical method. Asian J Chem 23(2):875Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stobinski L, Lesiak B, Malolepszy A, Mazurkiewicz M, Mierzwa B, Zemek J, Jiricek P, Bieloshapka I (2014) Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J Electron Spectrosc Relat Phenom 195:145–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Warren BE (1941) X-ray diffraction in random layer lattices. Phys Rev 59(9):693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45(7):1558–1565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    He H, Riedl T, Lerf A, Klinowski J (1996) Solid-state NMR studies of the structure of graphite oxide. J Phys Chem 100(51):19954–19958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fu C, Zhao G, Zhang H, Li S (2013) Evaluation and characterization of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Int J Electrochem 8:6269–6280Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ganguly A, Sharma S, Papakonstantinou P, Hamilton J (2011) Probing the thermal deoxygenation of graphene oxide using high-resolution in situ X-ray-based spectroscopies. J Phys Chem C 115(34):17009–17019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oh YJ, Yoo JJ, Kim YI, Yoon JK, Yoon HN, Kim JH, Park SB (2014) Oxygen functional groups and electrochemical capacitive behavior of incompletely reduced graphene oxides as a thin-film electrode of supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 116:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Krishnamoorthy K, Veerapandian M, Yun K, Kim SJ (2013) The chemical and structural analysis of graphene oxide with different degrees of oxidation. Carbon 53:38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lai Q, Zhu S, Luo X, Zou M, Huang S (2012) Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of graphene oxides. AIP Adv 2(3):032146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mohammed Ali Al-Sammarraie A, Hasan Raheema M (2017) Electrodeposited reduced graphene oxide films on stainless steel, copper, and aluminum for corrosion protection enhancement. Int J CorrosionGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Naumkin AV, Kraut-Vass A, Gaarenstroom SW, Cedric J. Powell NIST X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy database, NIST Standard Reference Database 20, Version 4.1Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cardenas L, MacLeod J, Lipton-Duffin J, Seifu DG, Popescu F, Siaj M, Mantovani D, Rosei F (2014) Reduced graphene oxide growth on 316L stainless steel for medical applications. Nanoscale 6(15):8664–8670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cote LJ, Kim J, Zhang Z, Sun C, Huang J (2010) Tunable assembly of graphene oxide surfactant sheets: wrinkles, overlaps and impacts on thin film properties. Soft Matter 6(24):6096–6101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cassie AB, Baxter S (1944) Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc 40:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gao N, Yan Y (2009) Modeling superhydrophobic contact angles and wetting transition. J Bionic Eng 6(4):335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vizhi ME, Vanithakumari SC, George RP, Vasantha S, Mudali UK (2016) Superhydrophobic coating on modified 9Cr–1Mo ferritic steel using perfluoro octyl triethoxy silane. Surf Eng 32(2):139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Förch R, Schönherr H, Jenkins AT (eds) (2009) Surface design: applications in bioscience and nanotechnology. Wiley, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vanithakumari SC, George RP, Mudali UK (2014) Influence of silanes on the wettability of anodized titanium. Appl Surf Sci 292:650–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cwikel D, Zhao Q, Liu C, Su X, Marmur A (2010) Comparing contact angle measurements and surface tension assessments of solid surfaces. Langmuir 26(19):15289–15294CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geetisubhra Jena
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. C. Vanithakumari
    • 1
  • C. Thinaharan
    • 1
  • R. P. George
    • 1
  • U. Kamachi Mudali
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Corrosion Science and Technology DivisionIndira Gandhi Centre for Atomic ResearchKalpakkamIndia
  2. 2.Homi Bhabha National InstituteMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Heavy Water BoardMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations