A Comparative Tribocorrosion Study of Additive Manufactured and Wrought 316L Stainless Steel in Simulated Body Fluids
In this study, the corrosion and tribocorrosion behavior of additive manufactured (AM) 316L is investigated and compared to wrought 316L. The experiments were performed in both a 0.9 wt% NaCl solution and a simulated body fluid based on the protein albumin. The results are interpreted based on the analysis of the microstructure, inherent AM porosities and surface roughness. The results confirm that the AM samples present a substandard behavior compared to the wrought materials due to the higher surface area caused by the voids inherent to the AM process.
KeywordsBio-tribocorrosion Additive manufacturing 316L
The authors would like to thank Cristian Torres for his help in conducting the experiments and Vegard Brtan for his help with the SLM process. The authors would like to acknowledge the support from the research center ‘SFI Manufacturing’ and the MKRAM project (Grant No. 248243), which is sponsored by the Research Council of Norway and industrial partners.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 7.Sin JR (2015) Investigation of the corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of metallic biomaterials. Doctoral Thesis, Luleaa University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- 8.Yan Y (2006) Corrosion and tribocorrosion behaviour of metallic orthopaedic implant materials. Doctoral Thesis, The University of LeedsGoogle Scholar
- 14.Munoz AI, Espallargas N (2011) Tribocorrosion mechanisms in sliding contacts. In: Landolt D, Mischler S (eds) Tribocorrosion of passive metals and coatings. Woodhead Publishing, LausanneGoogle Scholar
- 31.McCafferty E (2009) Thermodynamics of corrosion: pourbaix diagrams. Introduction to corrosion science. Springer, New York, pp 95–117Google Scholar
- 32.Vidal CV, Munoz AI (2011) Electrochemical aspects in biomedical alloy characterization: electrochemical impedance spectrosopy, biomedical engineering, trends in materials science. InTech, LondonGoogle Scholar