Advertisement

Degradation and Corrosion Behavior of Electrospun PHBV Coated AZ-31 Magnesium Alloy for Biodegradable Implant Applications

  • J. CastroEmail author
  • K. Gokula Krishnan
  • S. Jamaludeen
  • P. Venkataragavan
  • S. Gnanavel
Article
  • 97 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Surface Modifications and Coatings

Abstract

The roles of biodegradable materials have been increasing due to its promising and improved features than conventional materials used for biomedical implants. Thus, the need for developing a better biodegradable material is necessary which could deliver better properties for the implants. This present study aims to develop a better biodegradable material where magnesium alloy (AZ-31) chosen as the substrate is surface-modified by annealing followed by a chemical treatment and then PHBV (poly (3-hydroxybutyric acid-co-3-hydrovaleric acid)) having 12% hydroxyvaleric acid content is coated over the modified surface. The coating of the polymer over the sample substrate is done by electrospinning. X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses showed successful surface modification and deposition of polymer over the substrate. The degradation behavior of the samples was investigated through immersion studies in simulated body fluid (Hanks’ solution). The FESEM images of the coated samples were identified with fibers on the surface even after the immersion for 21 days. The corrosion studies were carried out by potentiodynamic polarization method which proved coated sample has a better corrosion resistance than the bare metal in the SBF solution. Nano-fibrous PHBV coating combined with surface modification seems to be a promising method to tailor the degradation and improve the corrosion resistance of Mg alloys which can be used as a better material for biomedical implants.

Keywords

Mg alloy (AZ-31) Electrospinning Biodegradable implant PHBV 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank and acknowledge Nanotechnology Research Centre and Department of Chemistry, SRM University, India, for their support in the laboratory, characterization and corrosion studies.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Zheng YF, Gu XN, Witte F (2014) Biodegradable metals. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 77:1–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Virtanen S (2011) Biodegradable Mg and Mg alloys: corrosion and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng B 176(20):1600–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mueller WD, Lucia Nascimento M, Lorenzo de Mele MF (2010) Critical discussion of the results from different corrosion studies of Mg and Mg alloys for biomaterial applications. Acta Biomater 6(5):1749–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang Y et al (2010) Characterization and degradation comparison of DLC film on different magnesium alloys. Surf Coat Technol 205(Supplement 1):S15–S20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Witte F et al (2008) Degradable biomaterials based on magnesium corrosion. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci 12(5–6):63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mochizuki A, Kaneda H (2015) Study on the blood compatibility and biodegradation properties of magnesium alloys. Mater Sci Eng C 47:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanzi AC et al (2010) On the in vitro and in vivo degradation performance and biological response of new biodegradable Mg-Y-Zn alloys. Acta Biomater 6(5):1824–1833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    da Conceição TF et al (2012) Controlled degradation of a magnesium alloy in simulated body fluid using hydrofluoric acid treatment followed by polyacrylonitrile coating. Corros Sci 62:83–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alvarez-Lopez M et al (2010) Corrosion behaviour of AZ31 magnesium alloy with different grain sizes in simulated biological fluids. Acta Biomater 6(5):1763–1771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Uddin MS, Colin H, Peter M (2015) Surface treatments for controlling corrosion rate of biodegradable Mg and Mg-based alloy implants. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16(5):053501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Song S et al (2012) Corrosion study of new surface treatment/coating for AZ31B magnesium alloy. Surf Eng 28(7):486–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sasikumar Y et al (2017) Effect of surface treatment on the bioactivity and electrochemical behavior of magnesium alloys in simulated body fluid. Mater Corros 68:776–790. doi: 10.1002/maco.201609317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hornberger H, Virtanen S, Boccaccini AR (2012) Biomedical coatings on magnesium alloys—A review. Acta Biomater 8(7):2442–2455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yuan T et al (2016) Fabrication of a delaying biodegradable magnesium alloy-based esophageal stent via coating elastic polymer. Materials 9(5):384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tian P, Liu X, Ding C (2015) In vitro degradation behavior and cytocompatibility of biodegradable AZ31 alloy with PEO/HT composite coating. Coll Surf B Biointerfaces 128:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lu LX et al (2012) The effects of PHBV electrospun fibers with different diameters and orientations on growth behavior of bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Mater 7(1):015002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li X et al (2009) Improving hydrophilicity, mechanical properties and biocompatibility of poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-(R)-3-hydroxyvalerate] through blending with poly[(R)-3-hydroxybutyrate]-alt-poly(ethylene oxide). Acta Biomater 5(6):2002–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boskhomdzhiev AP et al (2010) Biodegradation kinetics of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-based biopolymer systems. Biochemistry (Moscow) supplement series B: biomedical. Chemistry 4(2):177–183Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dahl SR, Olsen KM, Strand DH (2012) Determination of gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB), beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), pregabalin, 1,4-butane-diol (1,4BD) and gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) in whole blood and urine samples by UPLC-MSMS. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 885–886:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manavitehrani I et al (2016) Biomedical applications of biodegradable polyesters. Polymers 8(1):20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tong H-W, Wang M (2008) Electrospinning of fibrous PHBV tissue engineering scaffolds: fiber diameter control, fiber alignment and mechanical properties. The 5th International Conference on Information Technology and Application in Biomedicine (ITAB 2008), in conjunction with the 2nd International Symposium & Summer School on Biomedical and Health Engineering, Shenzhen, China, 30–31 May 2008. In: Proceedings of the ITAB, pp 535–538Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie J, Li X, Xia Y (2008) Putting electrospun nanofibers to work for biomedical research. Macromol Rapid Commun 29(22):1775–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Soujanya GK et al (2014) Electrospun nanofibrous polymer coated Magnesium alloy for biodegradable implant applications. Proc Mater Sci 5:817–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wagner A et al (2014) Analysis of porous electrospun fibers from Poly(l-lactic acid)/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) blends. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2(8):1976–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hatami M, Saremi M, Naderi R (2015) Improvement in the protective performance and adhesion of polypyrrole coating on AZ31 Mg alloys. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 25(5):478–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Y et al (2008) Corrosion process of pure magnesium in simulated body fluid. Mater Lett 62(14):2181–2184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tian P, Liu X (2015) Surface modification of biodegradable magnesium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Regen Biomater 2(2):135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu H, Yan C, Yao J (2014) Fully biodegradable food packaging materials based on functionalized cellulose nanocrystals/poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) nanocomposites. RSC Adv 4(104):59792–59802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Amaravathy P et al (2012) Evaluation of in vitro bioactivity and MG63 oesteoblast cell response for TiO2 coated magnesium alloys. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol 64(3):694–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Farago PV et al (2008) Physicochemical characterization of a hydrophilic model drug-loaded PHBV microparticles obtained by the double emulsion/solvent evaporation technique. J Braz Chem Soc 19:1298–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hanas T et al (2016) Tailoring degradation of AZ31 alloy by surface pre-treatment and electrospun PCL fibrous coating. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 65:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chunxi Y et al (2010) Effects of magnesium alloys extracts on adult human bone marrow-derived stromal cell viability and osteogenic differentiation. Biomed Mater 5(4):045005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Geng F et al (2009) The preparation, cytocompatibility, and in vitro biodegradation study of pure β-TCP on magnesium. J Mater Sci Mater Med 20(5):1149–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Volova TG (2004) Polyhydroxyalkanoates—Plastic materials of the 21st century: production, properties, applications. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Castro
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Gokula Krishnan
    • 1
  • S. Jamaludeen
    • 1
  • P. Venkataragavan
    • 1
  • S. Gnanavel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringSRM UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations