Skip to main content
Log in

Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) to Examine Implicit Gender Stereotypes in Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM)

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Women are often subject to gender stereotyping in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) was used to determine directionality of any implicit gender-STEM bias detected. In addition, the IRAP was used to explore the possibility of implicit ageism bias, because there is anecdotal evidence of high levels of ageism in the STEM areas. Thus two IRAPs (one with adult pictorial stimuli and one with child pictorial stimuli) were employed to assess implicit gender bias toward STEM with a sample of undergraduates (N = 33). Results indicated a gender STEM bias in both IRAPs and the directionality in both IRAPs was pro-male and not anti-female. Participant gender was not shown to impact results in either IRAP. Gender bias effects were more pronounced in the Adult-IRAP results. Comparison of bias toward older versus young pictorial stimuli was exploratory thus findings are preliminary but may suggest ageism and potential negative interaction effects between age and gender warrant further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32(7), 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010a). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60(3), 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Murtagh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2010b). Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to measure attitudes toward meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record, 60(2), 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bench, S. W., Lench, H. C., Liew, J., Miner, K., & Flores, S. A. (2015). Gender gaps in overestimation of Math performance. Sex Roles, 72, 536–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0486-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbaum, E. G. (1988). Museum, arts, and humanities librarians: careers, professional development, and continuing education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 29(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.2307/40323567

  • Blažev, M., Karabegović, M., Burušić, J., & Selimbegović, L. (2017). Predicting gender-STEM stereotyped beliefs among boys and girls from prior school achievement and interest in STEM school subjects. Social Psychology of Education, 20, 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (2011). Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 3157–3162. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014871108.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the malleability of ageist attitudes: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, D. L., Barnes-Holmes, D., Gresswell, D. M., Hart, A. J. P., & Gore, N. J. (2009). Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: A First Study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 21(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1079063208326928.

  • Farrell, L., & McHugh, L. (2017). Examining gender-STEM bias among STEM and non-STEM students using the implicit relational assessment procedure (IRAP). Journal of Contextual Behavioural Science, 6(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, L., Cochrane, A., & McHugh, L. (2015). Exploring attitudes towards gender and science: The advantages of an IRAP approach versus the IAT. Journal of Contextual Behavioural Science, 4(2), 121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Hussey, I., & Graddy, J. (2016). Exploring the behavioural dynamics of the implicit relational assessment procedure: The impact of three types of introductory rules. The Psychological Record, 66, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0173-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, S. J., Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2008). Gender differences in educational achievement to age 25. Australian Journal of Education, 52(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F000494410805200105.

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwarz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunspan, D. Z., Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., Wiggins, B. L., Crowe, A. J., & Goodreau, S. M. (2016). Males under-estimate academic performance of their female peers in undergraduate biology classrooms. PloS One, 11(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148405

  • Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Levine, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2012). The role of parents and teachers in the development of gender-related math attitudes. Sex Roles, 66, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9996-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelsman, J., Cantor, N., Carnes, M., Denton, D., Fine, E., Grosz, B., et al. (2005). More women in Science. Science, 309(5738), 1190–1191. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1113252.

  • Helwig, R., Anderson, L., & Tindal, G. (2001). Influence of elementary student gender on teachers' perceptions of mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670109596577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, N., & Mills, M. (1992). Gender influences on age cognitions and preferences: sociocultural or sociobiological? Psychology & Aging, 7, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.7.1.98. Accessed 16 Nov 2019.

  • Leslie, S.-J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Exploring the behavioural dynamics of the implicit relational assessment procedure: The role of relational contextual cues versus relational coherence indicators as response options. The Psychological Record, 66(3), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0173-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206543http://utdallas.box.com/v/facedatabase.

  • Moakler, M. W., & Kin, M. M. (2014). College major choice in STEM: Revisiting confidence and demographic factors. Career Development Quarterly, 62, 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00075.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favour male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C., Caluori, N., & Rabasco, H. (2018). Gender bias produces gender gaps in STEM engagement. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 79(11–12), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newall, C., Gonsalkorale, K., Walker, E., Forbes, G. A., Highfield, K., & Sweller, N. (2018). Science education: Adult biases because of the child’s gender and gender stereotypicality. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 55, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, J., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). Implicit relational assessment procedure and body-weight bias: Influence of gender of participants and targets. The Psychological Record, 6(3), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.11133/j.tpr.2013.63.3.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Hansen, J. J., Devos, T., Lindner, N. M., Ranganath, K. A., et al. (2007). Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes. European Review of Social Psychology, 18, 36–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280701489053http://www.projectimplicit.net/nosek/stimuli.

  • Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593–10597. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0809921106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, L. T., Garcia, D. M., Adams, G., Villalobos, J. G., Hammer, E., & Gilbert, P. (2015). The threat of sexism in a STEM educational setting: The moderating impacts of ethnicity and legitimacy beliefs on test performance. Social Psychology of Education, 18(4), 667–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-015-9310-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, E. D., Rackley, K. R., & Awad, G. H. (2017). Perceptions of male and female STEM aptitude: The moderating effect of benevolent and hostile sexism. Journal of Career Development, 44(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0894845316641514.

  • Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2014). How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 4403–4408. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1314788111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzert, T. R., Anderson, L. M., Reilly, E. E., Gorrell, S., Forsyth, J. P., & Anderson, D. A. (2016). Assessment of weight/shape implicit bias related to attractiveness, fear, and disgust. The Psychological Record, 66(3), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0181-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2012). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 652–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1982). Asking questions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2018). Global gender gap report 2018. [online] Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2018.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2019.

Download references

Availability of Data and Materials

All data and materials used in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Funding

The second author is funded by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions COFUND Collaborative Research Fellowships for a Responsive and Innovative Europe (CAROLINE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carol Murphy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fleming, K., Foody, M. & Murphy, C. Using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) to Examine Implicit Gender Stereotypes in Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM). Psychol Rec 70, 459–469 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00401-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00401-6

Keywords

Navigation