Skip to main content

The Stimulus’ Orienting Function May Play an Important Role in IRAP Performance: Supportive Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study of Brands

Abstract

The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) has been typically used to access behavioral biases to relations that the participants learned throughout their history of social interactions. Recent research has highlighted the role of the stimulus orienting function on IRAP performance. The present study used the IRAP to assess preference biases for smartphone application (app) icons, namely WhatsApp and Messenger, and intended to check if these biases correspond to the orienting function of these stimuli in a visual search paradigm monitored by eye tracking. The IRAP presented relations between the WhatsApp and Messenger icons and happy or angry facial expressions. The visual search task had two steps: in Step 1, matrices of app icons were designed to emulate smartphone screens, and the participant was instructed to find either the WhatsApp or the Messenger icon; in Step 2, happy or angry faces were presented as targets in matrices of pictures of neutral faces that functioned as distractors. Participants were more prompted to respond Yes than No to the relation between the WhatsApp icon and happy facial expressions in IRAP trials, and showed ambivalent bias to the Messenger icon. Regarding the visual search performance, participants’ were faster to find the WhatsApp target than to find the Messenger target. In addition, they were faster to find the happy targets than the angry targets. Results from the current study corroborate the hypothesis that the stimulus orienting function may play an important role on IRAP performance and, as a result, are supportive to the Differential Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding Effects (DAARRE) model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you know what you really believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Evaluation Procedure (IRAP) as a direct measure of implicit beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32, 169–177.

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010a). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60, 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Murtagh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2010b). Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to measure attitudes toward meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record, 60, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hussey, I., & Luciano, C. (2016). Relational Frame Theory: Finding its historical roots and future development. In R. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & T. Biglan (Eds.), Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 161–175). Cambridge, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489857.ch8.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Finn, M., McEnteggart, C., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2018). Derived stimulus relations and their role in a behavior-analytic account of human language and cognition. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 41, 155–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0124-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bortoloti, R., de Almeida, R. V., de Almeida, J. H., & de Rose, J. C. (2019). Emotional faces in symbolic relations: A happiness superiority effect involving the equivalence paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring Emotion: The Self-Assessment Semantic Differential Manikin and the Semantic Differential Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V.(1976). Pictures of Facial Affect. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

  • Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2018). Exploring the single-trial-type-dominance-effect in the IRAP: Developing a Differential Arbitrarily Applicable Relational Responding Effects (DAARRE) model. The Psychological Record, 68, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0262-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & McEnteggart, C. (2019). Predicting and Influencing the Single Trial-Type Dominance Effect. The Psychological Record, 69, 425-435.

  • Frischen, A., Eastwood, J. D., & Smilek, D. (2008). Visual search for faces with emotional expressions. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gidlöf, K., Anikin, A., Lingonblad, M., & Wallin, A. (2017). Looking is buying: How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf. Appetite, 116, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huziwara, E. M., de Souza, D. d. G., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2016). Patterns of eye movement in matching-to-sample tasks. Psicologia: Reflexao e Critica, 29, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0010-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., McEnteggart, C., & Finn, M. (2018). Exploring differential trial type effects and the impact of a read-aloud procedure on deictic relational responding on the IRAP. The Psychological Record, 68, 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0276-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, D., Matthyssen, N., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., McEnteggart, C., & Vastano, R. (2019). Exploring the use of pictures of self and other in the IRAP: Reflecting upon the emergence of differential trial type effects. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 19, 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. Visual Cognition, 14, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280500527676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. (2001). The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 32, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1066/S10012010002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. H. (2004). Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 405–415. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milosavljevic, M., Navalpakkam, V., Koch, C., & Rangel, A. (2012). Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Three chronometric indices of relational responding as predictors of performance on a brief intelligence test: The importance of relational flexibility. The Psychological Record, 59, 119–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yiend, J. (2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903205698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was part of the research program of Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia sobre Comportamento, Cognição e Ensino (National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition, and Teaching), under the leadership of Deisy G. de Souza and supported by the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Grant # 2014/50909-8) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Grant # 465686/2014-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joana Andrade Ramalho Pinto.

Ethics declarations

This manuscript has not been published or presented elsewhere, in part or in its entirety, and is not under consideration by another journal.

Availability of Data and Materials

Data supporting the findings presented in this article can be found at https://osf.io/qnvbh/ and through doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/QNVBH.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee, as well as with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Proper informed consent was obtained, and the study design was approved by the appropriate ethics review boards. All the authors have approved the manuscript and agree with submission to the journal.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinto, J.A.R., de Almeida, R.V. & Bortoloti, R. The Stimulus’ Orienting Function May Play an Important Role in IRAP Performance: Supportive Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study of Brands. Psychol Rec 70, 257–266 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00378-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00378-2

Keywords

  • IRAP
  • eye tracking
  • WhatsApp
  • Messenger
  • facial expressions
  • orienting function
  • DAARRE model