Abstract
Reinforcement values of facial expressions for visual fixation remain underdeveloped in extant literature, though numerous studies have investigated the function of facial expressions as antecedents of gaze behavior. This study used a concurrent gaze-contingent reinforcement procedure to compare reinforcement values of positive and negative facial expressions for gaze fixation. In total, 7 of the 20 typical adults fixated more frequently on the side that was followed by positive facial expressions. The results suggest that a novel application of eye tracking technology could allow for the evaluation and comparison of reinforcement values of social visual stimuli.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 6–9.
Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Reward prediction bias attentional selection. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 262.
Averbeck, B. B., & Duchaine, B. (2009). Integration of social and utilitarian factors in decision making. Emotion, 9, 599–608.
Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., Woolrich, M. W., & Rushworth, M. F. (2008). Associative learning of social value. Nature, 456, 245–249.
Blair, R. J. R. (2003). Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 358, 561–572.
Call, N. A., Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., Reavis, A. R., & Findley, A. J. (2013). Direct assessment of preferences for social interactions in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46, 821–826.
Cannella-Malone, H. I., Sabielny, L., & Tullis, C. A. (2015). Using eye gaze to identify reinforcers for individuals with severe multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 680–684.
Constantino, J. N., Kennon-McGill, S., Weichselbaum, C., Marrus, N., Haider, A., Glowinski, A. L., et al. (2017). Infant viewing of social scenes is under genetic control and is atypical in autism. Nature, 547, 340–344.
Dube, W. V., Dickson, C. A., Balsamo, L. M., O’Donnell, K. L., Tomanari, G. Y., Farren, K. M., . . . McIlvane, W. J. (2010). Observing behavior and atypically restricted stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 297–313.
Eisenbarth, H., & Alpers, G. W. (2011). Happy mouth and sad eyes: Scanning emotional facial expressions. Emotion, 11, 860–865.
Falck-Ytter, T., Bölte, S., & Gredebäck, G. (2013). Eye tracking in early autism research. Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 5(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-5-28.
Fantz, R. L. (1965). Visual perception from birth as shown by pattern selectivity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 118, 793–814.
Feinman, S., & Lewis, M. (1983). Social referencing at ten months: A second-order effect on infants' responses to strangers. Child Development, 54, 878–887.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.
Fleming, C. V., Wheeler, G. M., Cannella-Malone, H. I., Basbagill, A. R., Chung, Y. C., & Day, K. G. (2010). An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 266–275.
Frank, M. C., Vul, E., & Johnson, S. P. (2009). Development of infants’ attention to faces during first year. Cognition, 110, 160–170.
Furl, N., Gallagher, S., & Averbeck, B. B. (2012). A selective emotional decision-making bias elicited by facial expressions. PLoS ONE, 7, e33461.
Gliga, T., Elsabbagh, M., Andravizou, A., & Johnson, M. (2009). Faces attract infants’ attention in complex displays. Infancy, 14, 550–562.
Heerey, E. A. (2014). Learning from social rewards predicts individual differences in self-reported social ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 332–339.
Hernstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.
Jones, W., & Klin, A. (2013). Attention to eyes is present but in decline in 2–6-month-old infants later diagnosed with autism. Nature, 504, 427–431.
Kelly, M. A., Roscoe, E. M., Hanley, G. P., & Schlichenmeyer, K. (2014). Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 113–135.
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Visual fixation patterns during viewing of naturalistic social situations as predictors of social competence in individuals with autism. Archives of General Psychiatry, 59, 809–816.
Kringelbach, M., & Rolls, E. T. (2003). Neural correlates of rapid reversal learning in a simple model of human social interaction. NeuroImage, 20, 1371–1383.
LaBarbera, J. D., Izard, C. E., Vietze, P., & Parisi, S. A. (1976). Four- and six-month-old infants’ visual responses to joy, anger, and neutral expressions. Child Development, 47, 535–538.
Laidlaw, K. E. W., Foulsham, T., Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 5548–5553.
Martin, T. L., Yu, C. T., Martin, G. L., & Fazzio, D. (2006). On choice, preference, and preference for choice. Behavior Analyst Today, 7, 234–241.
Matsuda, S., Minagawa, Y., & Yamamoto, J. (2015). Gaze behavior of children with ASD toward pictures of facial expressions. Autism Research & Treatment, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1115/2015/617190.
Mazur, J. E. (1991). Choice. In H. Iverson & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior (pp. 219–250). New York, NY: Elsevier.
Paeye, C., & Madelain, L. (2011). Reinforcing saccadic amplitude variability. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 95, 149–162.
Paeye, C., Schütz, A. C., & Gegenfurther, K. R. (2016). Visual reinforcement shapes eye movements in visual search. Journal of Vision, 16, 15.
Pelaez, M., Virues-Ortega, J., & Gewirtz, J. L. (2012). Acquisition of social referencing via discrimination training in infants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 45, 23–36.
Perez, W. F., Endemann, P., Pessôa, C. V. B. B., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2015). Assessing stimulus control in a discrimination task with compound stimuli: Evaluating testing procedures and tracking eye fixations. The Psychological Record, 65, 83–88.
Pierce, K., Marinero, S., Hazin, R., McKenna, B., Barnes, C. C., & Malige, A. (2016). Eye tracking reveals abnormal visual preference for geometric images as an early biomarker of an autism spectrum disorder subtype associated with increased symptom severity. Biological Psychiatry, 79, 657–666.
Pourtois, G., Grandjean, D., Sander, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2004). Electrophysiological correlates of rapid spatial orienting towards fearful faces. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 619–633.
Rosenberger, P. B. (1973). Concurrent schedule control of human visual target fixations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20, 411–416.
Schrandt, J. A., Townsend, D. B., & Poulson, C. L. (2009). Teaching empathy skills to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 17–32.
Schroeder, S. R., & Holland, J. G. (1968a). Operant control of eye movements during human vigilance. Science, 161, 292–293.
Schroeder, S. R., & Holland, J. G. (1968b). Operant control of eye movements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 161–166.
Schroeder, S. R., & Holland, J. G. (1969). Reinforcement of eye movement with concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 897–903.
Steingrimsdottir, H. S., & Arntzen, E. (2016). Eye movements during conditional discrimination training. The Psychological Record, 66, 201–212.
Teller, D. Y. (1979). The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: A psychophysical technique for use with human infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 2, 135–153.
Vernetti, A., Senju, A., Charman, T., Johnson, M. H., Gliga, T., & Team, B. A. S. I. S. (2018). Stimulating interaction: Using gaze-contingent eye-tracking to measure the reward value of social signals in toddlers with and without autism. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 29, 21–29.
Vernetti, A., Smith, T. J., & Senju, A. (2017). Gaze-contingent reinforcement learning reveals incentive value of social signals in young children adults. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 284, 20162747.
Wang, Q., Bolhuis, J., Rothkopf, C. A., Kolling, T., Knoph, M., & Triesch, J. (2012). Infants in control: Rapid anticipation of action outcomes in a gaze-contingent paradigm. PLoS ONE, 7, e30884.
Windsor, J., Piché, L. M., & Locke, P. A. (1994). Preference testing: A comparison of two presentation methods. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 15, 439–455.
de Wit, T. C. J., Falck-Ytter, T., & von Hofsten, C. (2008). Young children with autism spectrum disorder look differently at positive versus negative emotional faces. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2, 651–659.
Zahn-Waxler, C., Robinson, J. L., & Emde, R. N. (1992). The development of empathy in twins. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1038–1047.
Funding
This study was funded by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas No. 18H04182 “Construction of the Face-Body Studies in Transcultural Conditions” to S. M., and the CREST research project on Social Imaging (JPMJCR14E2), Japan Science and Technology Agency to J. Y.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsuda, S., Omori, T., McCleery, J.P. et al. Comparing Reinforcement Values of Facial Expressions: An Eye-Tracking Study. Psychol Rec 69, 393–400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00330-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00330-z