Abstract
Although researchers have evaluated the application of equivalence-based instruction (EBI) to naturalistic teaching settings, few have examined individualized educational programs of application. The current study therefore employed an EBI procedure to teach individual categorization lessons to pre-school age children (n = 5). A category sort test was used to identify stimuli for each child which were incorrectly categorized pre-intervention. These stimuli consisted of real-world stimuli from non-overlapping categories (e.g., toys, clothing, and fruit). Participants were trained in six conditional discriminations tested for the emergence of three three-member classes (A1, B1, C1; A2, B2, C2; A3, B3, C3) using a computerized touchscreen matching to sample (MTS) procedure. Participants subsequently were trained to identify receptively the category label for the C stimulus in each class. Following training and testing, the category sort test was re-administered. All participants demonstrated categorization of the directly trained class members and further generalization to addition unknown stimuli. The results show that little training was required in the use of touchscreen responding indicating that the use of such devices may provide a simple means of computerized teaching in young populations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395227.
Devany, J. M., Hayes, S. C., & Nelson, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.46-243.
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Stanley, C. R., Speelman, R. C., Rowsey, K. E., Kime, D., & Daar, J. H. (2016). Establishing derived categorical responding in children with disabilities using the PEAK-E curriculum. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.355.
Fienup, D. M., Covey, D. P., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Teaching brain—behavior relations economically with stimulus equivalence technology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-19.
Fienup, D. M., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Efficiently establishing concepts of inferential statistics and hypothesis decision making through contextually controlled equivalence classes. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-437.
Fields, L., & Moss, P. (2008). Formation of partially and fully elaborated generalized equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90(2), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008.90-135.
Fields, L., Reeve, K. F., Adams, B. J., & Verhave, T. (1991). Stimulus generalization and equivalence classes: a model for natural categories. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(3), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1991.55-305.
Fields, L., Travis, R., Roy, D., Yadlovker, E., Aguiar-Rocha, L. D., & Sturmey, P. (2009). Equivalence class formation: a method for teaching statistical interactions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(3), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-575.
Fields, L., Verhave, T., & Fath, S. (1984). Stimulus equivalence and transitive associations: A methodological analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42(1), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1984.42-143.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Galizio, M., Stewart, K. L., & Pilgrim, C. (2004). Typicality effects in contingency-shaped generalized equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82(3), 253–273. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.82-253.
Groskreutz, N. C., Karsina, A., Miguel, C. F., & Groskreutz, M. P. (2010). Using complex auditory—visual samples to produce emergent relations in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-131.
Haegele, K. M., McComas, J. J., Dixon, M., & Burns, M. K. (2011). Using a stimulus equivalence paradigm to teach numerals, English words, and Native American words to preschool-age children. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(4), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-011-9134-9.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185.
Hourcade, J. P., Perry, K. B., & Sharma, A. (2008). PointAssist: helping four year olds point with ease. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 202-209). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463689.1463757.
LeBlanc, L. A., Miguel, C. F., Cummings, A. R., Goldsmith, T. R., & Carr, J. E. (2003). The effects of three stimulus-equivalence testing conditions on emergent US geography relations of children diagnosed with autism. Behavioral Interventions, 18(4), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.144.
Libby, M. E., Weiss, J. S., Bancroft, S., & Ahearn, W. H. (2008). A comparison of most-to-least and least-to-most prompting on the acquisition of solitary play skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391719Miguel.
Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2008). The role of naming in stimulus categorization by preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89(3), 383–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008-89-383
Nason, S., & Zabrucky, K. (1988). A program for comprehension monitoring of text using HyperCard for the Macintosh. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 20, 499–502. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202704.
Ninness, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., Ford, A. M., Payne, R., et al. (2006). Transformations of mathematical and stimulus functions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2006.139-05.
Ninness, C., Dixon, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Rehfeldt, R. A., Rumph, R., McCuller, G., et al. (2009). Constructing and deriving reciprocal trigonometric relations: a functional analytic approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-191.
Pytte, C. L., & Fienup, D. M. (2012). Using equivalence-based instruction to increase efficiency in teaching neuroanatomy. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 10(2), A125–A131.
Quinn, P., & Eimas, P. (1997). A reexamination of the perceptual-to-conceptual shift in mental representations. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 271 https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.271.
Quinn, P., Eimas, P., & Tarr, M. (2001). Perceptual categorization of cat and dog silhouettes by 3-to 4-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.2000.2609.
Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: an analysis of articles published in the journal of applied behavior analysis, 1992–2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x.
Saunders, R. R., Drake, K. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1999.71-195.
Shimizu, H., Yoon, S., & McDonough, C. S. (2010). Teaching skills to use a computer mouse in preschoolers with developmental disabilities: shaping moving a mouse and eye–hand coordination. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1448–1461 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.06.013.
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5.
Silver Lining Multimedia (2009). Picture This Professional Edition (Version 3.0). [Computer software]. Poughkeepsie, NY.
Still, K., Rehfeldt, R. A., Whelan, R., May, R., & Dymond, S. (2014). Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(9), 1184–1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.06.003.
Zentall, T. R., & Smeets, P. M. (Eds.). (1996). Stimulus class formation in humans and animals. Elsevier.
Zentall, G. A. (2002). Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(3), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-237.
Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2002). Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition. PsycTESTS Dataset. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15140-000
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted as part of the first author’s doctoral studies.
Funding
The School of Nursing and Human Sciences at Dublin City University provided funding of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians of the all individual participants, and the participants themselves assented to taking part in the study.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or National Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barron, R., Leslie, J.C. & Smyth, S. Teaching Real-World Categories Using Touchscreen Equivalence-Based Instruction. Psychol Rec 68, 89–101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0277-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-018-0277-0