Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 197–211 | Cite as

Behavioral Economic Predictors of Alcohol and Sexual Risk Behavior in College Drinkers

  • Shea M. Lemley
  • William A. FlemingIII
  • David P. JarmolowiczEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Heavy alcohol use among college students is a major public health concern. Alcohol use commonly occurs with sexual risk behaviors, but etiology remains unclear. Behavioral economics has yielded insights into decision-making processes underlying problematic health choices, including alcohol use and sexual risk behavior. In particular, the reinforcer pathologies framework has integrated behavioral economic demand and delay discounting to improve our understanding of addiction, but has yet to be extended to the study of sexual risk. In order to account for past sexual risk behavior and alcohol consumption, the current study examined college students’ demand for alcohol, money delay discounting, alcohol delay discounting, and sexual partners delay and probability discounting. Results revealed that behavioral economic variables (i.e., demand intensity, sexual partners delay discounting, alcohol delay discounting, and money delay discounting) were significant predictors of sexual risk and alcohol consumption levels. Additionally, consistent with the reinforcer pathologies model, an inability to delay sexual gratification (sexual delay discounting) and overvaluation of alcohol (demand intensity) interacted to account for significant variance in alcohol consumption and sexual risk. These findings highlight the importance of considering both sexual and alcohol decision making in research and intervention with college students.

Keywords

College students Sexual risk Alcohol Discounting Demand 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The present project was conducted in accords the with a researcher protocol approved by the Human Subjects Committee, Lawrence, the Institutional Review Board for the University of Kansas.

Funding

The present study was funded by a Strategic Initiative Grant from the University of Kansas Research Investment Council (INS0075092) to DPJ.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Abbey, A., Zawacki, T., Buck, O., Clinton, A. M., & McAuslan, P. (2004). Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: what do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 271–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Amlung, M. T., Acker, J., Stojek, M. K., Murphy, J. G., & MacKillop, J. (2012). Is talk "cheap"? An initial investigation of the equivalence of alcohol purchase task performance for hypothetical and actual rewards. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 36(4), 716–724.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Howland, J., Rohsenow, D. J., Metrik, J., & MacKillop, J. (2013). Impulsivity and alcohol demand in relation to combined alcohol and caffeine use. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(6), 467–474. doi: 10.1037/a0034214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Aston, E. R., Metrik, J., Amlung, M. T., Kahler, C. W., & MacKillop, J. (2016). Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: convergence in behavioral economic methods. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 169, 141–147. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertholet, N., Murphy, J. G., Daeppen, J., Gmel, G., & Gaume, J. (2015). The alcohol purchase task in young men from the general population. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 146(1), 39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.10.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., MacKillop, J., Epstein, L. H., Carr, K., Mueller, E. T., & Waltz, T. (2012a). The behavioral economics of reinforcement pathologies. In H. J. Shaffer (Ed.), Addiction syndrome handbook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  7. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Franck, C. T., Carrin, C., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012b). Altruism in time: social temporal discounting differentiates smokers from problem drinkers. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 224(1), 109–120. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2745-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., Koffarnus, M. N., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2012c). Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process contributing to addiction and other disease-related vulnerabilities: emerging evidence. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 134(3), 287–297. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bickel, W. K., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2011a). The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of reinforcer pathologies: implications for etiology and treatment of addiction. Current Psychiatry Reports, 13(5), 406–415. doi: 10.1007/s11920-011-0215-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bickel, W. K., Johnson, M. W., Koffarnus, M. N., MacKillop, J., & Murphy, J. G. (2014). The Behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 641–677. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153724.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Bickel, W. K., Landes, R. D., Christensen, D. R., Jackson, L., Jones, B. A., Kurth-Nelson, Z., & Redish, A. D. (2011b). Single- and cross-commodity discounting among cocaine addicts: the commodity and its temporal location determine discounting rate. Psychopharmacology (Berlin), 217(2), 177–187. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2272-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bickel, W. K., & Marsch, L. A. (2001). Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. Addiction, 96(1), 73–86. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961736.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, J. L., & Vanable, P. A. (2007). Alcohol use, partner type, and risky sexual behavior among college students: findings from an event-level study. Addictive Behaviors, 32(12), 2940–2952. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.06.011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Carey, K. B., Henson, J. M., Carey, M. P., & Maisto, S. A. (2007). Which heavy drinking college students benefit from a brief motivational intervention? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 663–669.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Carr, K. A., Daniel, T. O., Lin, H., & Epstein, L. H. (2011). reinforcement pathology and obesity. Current Drug Abuse Reviews, 4(3), 190–196.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Celio, M. A., MacKillop, J., Caswell, A. J., Mastroleo, N. R., Kahler, C. W., Barnett, N. P., & Monti, P. M. (2016). interactive relationships between sex-related alcohol expectancies and delay discounting on risky sex. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(3), 638–646. doi: 10.1111/acer.12988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2015). 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH): Detailed Tables. Rockville, MD.Google Scholar
  18. Chapman, G. B. (1996). Temporal discounting and utility for health and money. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(3), 771–791. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.771.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Christiansen, P., Cole, J. C., Goudie, A., & Field, M. (2012). Components of behavioural impulsivity and automatic cue approach predict unique variance in hazardous drinking. Psychopharmacology, 219, 501–510. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2396-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Collins, L. R., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement 14, 101–117. doi:10.15288/jsas.2002.s14.101.Google Scholar
  22. Cooper, M. L. (2006). Does drinking promote risky sexual behavior? a complex answer to a simple question. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Corbin, C. R., Scott, C. J., & Treat, T. A. (2016). Sociosexual attitudes, sociosexual behaviors, and alcohol use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 77(4), 629-663. doi:10.15288/jsad.2016.77.629.Google Scholar
  24. Dariotis, J. K., & Johnson, M. W. (2015). Sexual discounting among high-risk youth ages 18-24: implications for sexual and substance use risk behaviors. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 23(1), 49–58. doi: 10.1037/a0038399.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dixon, M. R., Marley, J., & Jacobs, E. A. (2003). Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(4), 449–458. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2003.36-449.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Epstein, L. H., Jankowiak, N., Fletcher, K. D., Carr, K. A., Nederkoorn, C., Raynor, H., & Finkelstein, E. (2014). Women who are motivated to eat and discount the future are more obese. Obesity, 22(6), 1394–1399. doi: 10.1002/oby.20661.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D. D. (2007). discounting of monetary and directly consumable rewards. Psychological Science, 18(1). doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01849.x.
  28. Field, M., Christiansen, P., Cole, J. C., & Goudie, A. (2007). Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction, 102, 579–586. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01743.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Herrmann, E. S., Hand, D. J., Johnson, M. W., Badger, G. J., & Heil, S. H. (2014). Examining delay discounting of condom-protected sex among opioid-dependent women and non-drug-using control women. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 144, 53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.07.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Holt, D. D., Newquist, M. H., Smits, R. R., & Tiry, A. M. (2014). Discounting of food, sex, and money. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 794–802. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0557-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hursh, S. R., Raslear, T. G., Shurtleff, D., Bauman, R., & Simmons, L. (1988). A cost‐benefit analysis of demand for food. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50(3), 419–440.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hursh, S. R., & Silberberg, A. (2008). Economic demand and essential value. Psychological Review, 115(1), 186–198. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Bickel, W. K., & Gatchalian, K. M. (2013). Alcohol-dependent individuals discount sex at higher rates than controls. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 131(3), 320–323. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.12.014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Cherry, J. B., Reed, D. D., Bruce, J. M., Crespi, J. M., Lusk, J. L., & Bruce, A. S. (2014a). Robust relation between temporal discounting rates and body mass. Appetite, 78, 63–67. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.02.013.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Landes, R. D., Christensen, D. R., Jones, B. A., Jackson, L., Yi, R., & Bickel, W. K. (2014b). Discounting of money and sex: effects of commodity and temporal position in stimulant dependent men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1652–1657. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.04.026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Lemley, S. M., Asmussen, L. L., & Reed, D. D. (2015a). Mr. right versus Mr. right now: a discounting-based approach to promiscuity. Behavioural Processes, 115, 117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.03.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Lemley, S. M., Cruse, D., & Sofis, M. (2015b). A cup today or a pot later: on the discounting of delayed caffeinated beverages. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 13(1), 101–111. doi: 10.1515/jafio-2015-0021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Lemley, S. M., Mateos, A., & Sofis, M. J. (2016). A multiple-stimulus-without-replacement assessment for sexual partners: purchase task validation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. doi: 10.1002/jaba.313.Google Scholar
  39. Jarmolowicz, D. P., Reed, D. D., DiGennaro Reed, F. D., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). The behavioral and neuroeconomics of reinforcer pathologies: Implications for managerial and health decision making. Managerial and Decision Economics, 9999. doi: 10.1002/mde.2716.
  40. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2), 129–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, M. W., & Bruner, N. R. (2012). The Sexual Discounting Task: HIV risk behavior and the discounting of delayed sexual rewards in cocaine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123, 15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Johnson, M. W., & Bruner, N. R. (2013). Test-retest reliability and gender differences in the Sexual Discounting Task among cocaine-dependent individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(4), 277–286. doi: 10.1037/a0033071.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, M. W., Johnson, P. S., Herrmann, E. S., & Sweeny, M. M. (2015). Delay and probability discounting of sexual and monetary outcomes in individuals with cocaine use disorders and matched controls. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0128641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128641.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson, P. S., Sweeney, M. M., Herrmann, E. S., & Johnson, M. W. (2016). Alcohol increases delay and probability discounting of condom-protected sex: a novel vector for alcohol-related HIV transmission. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 40(6), 1339–1350. doi: 10.1111/acer.13079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaplan, B. A., Amlung, M. T., Reed, D. D., Jarmolowicz, D. P., McKerchar, T., & Lemley, S. M. (2016). Automating scoring of delay discounting for the 21- and 27-item Monetary Choice Questionnaires. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  46. Kaplan, B. A., Lemley, S. M., Reed, D. D., & Jarmolowicz, D. P. (2014). 21- and 27-Item Monetary Choice Questionnaire automated scorers [software]. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1808/15424.
  47. Kiene, S. M., Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Armeli, S. (2009). Alcohol, helping young adults to have unprotected sex with casual partners: findings from a daily diary study of alcohol use and sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44(1), 73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.05.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirby, K. N. (2009). One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 457–462. doi: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kivlahan, D. R., Marlatt, G. A., Fromme, K., Coppel, D. B., & Williams, E. (1990). Secondary prevention with college drinkers: evaluation of an alcohol skills training program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 805–810.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Kollins, S. H. (2003). Delay discounting is associated with substance use in college students. Addictive Behaviors, 28(6), 1167–1173. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4603(02)00220-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Lawyer, S. R. (2008). Probability and delay discounting of erotic stimuli. Behavioural Processes, 79(1), 36–42. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.04.009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lawyer, S. R., & Schoepflin, F. J. (2013). Predicting domain-specific outcomes using delay and probability discounting for sexual versus monetary outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 96, 71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lawyer, S. R., Williams, S. A., Prihodova, T., Rollins, J. D., & Lester, A. C. (2010). Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes. Behavioural Processes, 84(3), 687–692. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.04.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Lemley, S. M., Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., Darden, A. C., & Jarmolowicz, D. P. (2016). Reinforcer pathologies: predicting alcohol related problems in college drinking men and women. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 167, 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.07.025.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Lewis, M. A., Rees, M., Logan, D. E., Kaysen, D. L., & Kilmer, J. R. (2010). Use of drinking protective behavioral strategies in association to sex-related alcohol negative consequences: The mediating role of alcohol consumption. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 24(2). doi: 10.1037/a0018361
  57. MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology, 216(3), 305–321. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2229-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. MacKillop, J., Celio, M. A., Mastroleo, N. R., Kahler, C. W., Operario, D., Colby, S. M., & Monti, P. M. (2015). Behavioral economic decision making and alcohol-related sexual risk behavior. AIDS and Behavior, 19(3), 450–458. doi: 10.1007/s10461-014-0909-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Mastroleo, N. R., & Logan, D. E. (2014). Response of colleges to risky drinking college students. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 97(10), 40–42.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Moody, L., Franck, C., Mueller, E., Carter, A., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Gatchalian, K., . . . Bickel, W. (2013). (Poster Presentation) Executive functioning deficits in alcohol-dependent and alcohol- and cocaine-dependent individuals. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
  61. Moorer, K. D., Madson, M. B., Mohn, R. S., & Nicholson, B. C. (2013). Alcohol consumption and negative sex-related consequences among college women: the moderating role of alcohol protective behavioral strategies. Journal of Drug Education, 43(4), 365–383. doi: 10.2190/DE.43.4.e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Murphy, J. G., & MacKillop, J. (2006). Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 14(2), 219–227. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.14.2.219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Murphy, J. G., MacKillop, J., Skidmore, J. R., & Pederson, A. A. (2009). Reliability and validity of a demand curve measure of alcohol reinforcement. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(6), 396–404. doi: 10.1037/a0017684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Myerson, J., Green, L., Hanson, J. S., Holt, D. D., & Estle, S. J. (2003). Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: processes and traits. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24(5), 619–635. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(03)00005-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76(2), 235–243. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Odum, A. L., & Rainaud, C. P. (2003). Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behavioural Processes, 64(3), 305–313. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00145-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. O'Hara, R. E., & Cooper, M. L. (2015). Bidirectional associations between alcohol use and sexual risk-taking behavior from adolescence into young adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(4), 857–871. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0510-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Osberg, T. M., & Boyer, A. (2016). Dangerous beliefs: college alcohol beliefs are associated with increased risk of regretted sexual encounters. Substance Use & Misuse, 51(12), 1555–1565. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2016.1188953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Petry, N. M. (2001). Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls. Psychopharmacology, 154(3), 243–250.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Petry, N. M. (2003). Discounting of money, health, and freedom in substance abusers and controls. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71(2), 133–141. doi: 10.1016/S0376-8716(03)00090-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Rachlin, H. (2006). Notes on discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85(3), 425–435. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.85-05.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Rachlin, H., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55(2), 233–244.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Rasmussen, E. B., Lawyer, S. R., & Reilly, W. (2010). Percent body fat is related to delay and probability discounting for food in humans. Behavioural Processes, 83(1), 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2009.09.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Rossow, I. (2008). Alcohol consumption and discounting. Addiction Research and Theory, 16(6), 572–584. doi: 10.1080/16066350801896248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J., Carey, K. B., Cunningham, K., Johnson, B. T., & Carey, M. P. (2016). Alcohol use predicts sexual decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the experimental literature. AIDS and Behavior, 20(S1), 19–39. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1108-9.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Shull, R. L. (1991). Mathematical descriptions of operant behavior: An introduction. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Part 2 (Techniques in the Behavioral and Neural Sciences) (Vol. 6, pp. 243-282): Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  77. Stalgaitis, C., & Glick, S. N. (2014). The use of web-based diaries in sexual risk behavior research: a systematic review. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 90(5), 374–381. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2013-051472.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Steele, C. M., & Josephs, R. A. (1990). Alcohol myopia. its prized and dangerous effects. The American Psychologist, 45(8), 921–933.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Turchik, J. A., & Garske, J. P. (2009). Measurement of sexual risk taking among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38(6), 936–948. doi: 10.1007/s10508-008-9388-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Vander Ven, T., & Beck, J. (2009). Getting drunk and hooking up: an exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociological Spectrum, 29, 626–648. doi: 10.1080/02732170903051417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vuchinich, R. E., & Simpson, C. A. (1998). Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6(3), 292–305. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.6.3.292.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. White, A., & Hingson, R. (2014). The burden of alcohol use: excessive alcohol consumption and related consequences among college students. Alcohol Research : Current Reviews, 35(2), 201–218.Google Scholar
  83. Yankelevitz, R. L., Mitchell, S. H., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Gender differences in factors associated with alcohol drinking: delay discounting and perception of others’ drinking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123(1-3), 273–276. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.11.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shea M. Lemley
    • 1
  • William A. FlemingIII
    • 1
  • David P. Jarmolowicz
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Applied Behavioral ScienceUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Problem Gambling Research and Education Support SystemUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations