Earning, Spending, and Drug Use in a Therapeutic Workplace
- 196 Downloads
Drug addiction is a chronic, relapsing health problem that is associated with the degree to which individuals choose small, immediate monetary outcomes over larger, delayed outcomes. This study was a secondary analysis exploring the relation between financial choices and drug use in opioid-dependent adults in a therapeutic workplace intervention. Sixty-seven participants were randomly assigned to a condition in which access to paid job training was contingent upon naltrexone adherence (N = 35) or independent of naltrexone adherence (N = 32). Participants could earn approximately $10 per hour for 4 hours every weekday and could exchange earnings for gift cards or bill payments each weekday. Urine was collected and tested for opiates and cocaine thrice weekly. Participants’ earning, spending, and drug use were not related to measures of delay discounting obtained prior to the intervention. When financial choices were categorized based on drug use during the intervention, however, those with less frequent drug use or frequent use of one drug spent a smaller proportion of their daily earnings and maintained a higher daily balance than those who frequently tested positive for both drugs (i.e., opiates and cocaine). Several patterns described the relation between cumulative earning and spending including no saving, periods of saving, and sustained saving. One destructive effect of drug use may be that it creates a perpetual zero-balance situation in the lives of users, which in turn prevents them from gaining materials that could help to break the cycle of addiction.
KeywordsDelay discountingᅟ Impulsivity Money management Drug dependence
This research was supported by Grants R01DA019386, R01DA23864, and T32DA07209 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse. The authors wish to thank Peter Causey for assistance with collecting the data.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest Statement
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). San Antonio: Psychology Corporation.Google Scholar
- Carroll, M. E., Anker, J. J., Mach, J. L., Newman, J. L., & Perry, J. L. (2010). Delay discounting as a predictor of drug abuse. In G. J. Madden & W. K. Bickel (Eds.), Impulsivity: The behavioral and neurological science of discounting (pp. 243–271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cottler, L. B. (1991). The CIDI and CIDI-substance abuse module (SAM): Cross-cultural instruments for assessing DSM-III, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10 criteria. In L. S. Harris (Ed.), Proceedings of the Committee on Problems of Drug Dependence 1990 (NIDA Research Monograph 105, DHHS Pub. No. ADM 91-1754 (pp. 167–177). Rockville: Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Dunn, K. E., Defulio, A., Everly, J. J., Donlin, W. D., Aklin, W. M., Nuzzo, P. A., & Silverman, K. (2013). Employment-based reinforcement of adherence to oral naltrexone treatment in unemployed injection drug users. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21(1), 74–83. doi: 10.1037/a0030743.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997). Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control patients: drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5(3), 256–262. doi: 10.1037/1064-12188.8.131.526.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior: The effect of delay and intervening events on reinforcement value (pp. 55–73). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- McLellan, A. T., Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J., Griffith, J., Evans, F., & Barr, H. L. (1985). New data from the addiction severity index: reliability and validity in three centers. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173(7), 412–423. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198507000-00005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silverman, K., DeFulio, A., & Sigurdsson, S. O. (2012). Maintenance of reinforcement to address the chronic nature of drug addiction. Preventive medicine, 55, S46–S53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.03.013
- Silverman, K., Wong, C. J., Needham, M., Diemer, K. N., Knealing, T., Crone‐Todd, D., & Kolodner, K. (2007). A randomized trial of employment‐based reinforcement of cocaine abstinence in injection drug users. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(3), 387–410. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2007.40-387.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Tucker, J. A., Roth, D. L., Vignolo, M. J., & Westfall, A. O. (2009). A behavioral economic reward index predicts drinking resolutions: moderation revisited and compared with other outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(2), 219–228. doi: 10.1037/a0014968.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson, G. (1993). The wide range achievement test (WRAT-3): Administration manual. Wilmington: Wide Range Inc.Google Scholar