Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 67, Issue 2, pp 137–148 | Cite as

The Value of Clean Air: Comparing Discounting of Delayed Air Quality and Money Across Magnitudes

  • Meredith S. BerryEmail author
  • Jonathan E. Friedel
  • William B. DeHart
  • Salif Mahamane
  • Kerry E. Jordan
  • Amy L. Odum
Original Article

Abstract

The detrimental health effects of exposure to air pollution are well established. Fostering behavioral change concerning air quality may be challenging because the detrimental health effects of exposure to air pollution are delayed. Delay discounting, a measure of impulsive choice, encapsulates this process of choosing between the immediate conveniences of behaviors that increase pollution and the delayed consequences of prolonged exposure to poor air quality. In Experiment 1, participants completed a series of delay-discounting tasks for air quality and money. We found that participants discounted delayed air quality more than money. In Experiment 2, we investigated whether the common finding that large amounts of money are discounted less steeply than small amounts of money generalized to larger and smaller improvements in air quality. Participants discounted larger improvements in air quality less steeply than smaller improvements, indicating that the discounting of air quality shares a similar process as the discounting of money. Our results indicate that the discounting of delayed money is strongly related to the discounting of delayed air quality and that similar mechanisms may be involved in the discounting of these qualitatively different outcomes. These data are also the first to demonstrate the malleability of delay discounting of air quality, and provide important public health implications for decreasing delay discounting of air quality.

Keywords

Delay discounting Intertemporal choice Behavioral economics Decision-making Air quality Environmental outcome Sustainability Conservation 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Funding

This research was funded in part by a Blue Goes Green grant awarded by the Utah State University Student Sustainability Office.

Conflict of Interest

All authors have declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Alessi, S. M., & Petry, N. M. (2003). Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes, 64(3), 345. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00150-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. American Lung Association (2016). Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from http://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/key-findings/
  3. Anderson, D. R., & Burnham, K. P. (2002). Avoiding pitfalls when using information-theoretic methods. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 66(3), 912. doi: 10.2307/3803155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anokhin, A. P., Golosheykin, S., Grant, J. D., & Heath, A. C. (2011). Heritability of delay discounting in adolescence: A longitudinal twin study. Behavior Genetics, 41(2), 175–183. doi: 10.1007/s10519-010-9384-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, M. S., Repke, M. A., Nickerson, N. P., Conway, L. G., III, Odum, A. L., & Jordan, K. E. (2015). Making time for nature: Visual exposure to natural environments lengthens subjective time perception and reduces impulsivity. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0141030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141030.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Berry, M. S., Sweeney, M. M., Morath, J., Odum, A. L., & Jordan, K. E. (2014). The nature of impulsivity: Visual exposure to natural environments decreases impulsive decision-making in a delay discounting task. PLoS ONE, 9(5), 1. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bickel, W. K., Yi, R., Landes, R. D., Hill, P. F., & Baxter, C. (2011). Remember the future: Working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts. Biological Psychiatry, 69(3), 260. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Borges, A. M., Kuang, J., Milhorn, H., & Yi, R. (2016). An alternative approach to calculating Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) in delay discounting research. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 106(2), 145–155. doi: 10.1002/jeab.219.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chabris, C. F., Laibson, D., Morris, C. L., Schuldt, J. P., & Taubinsky, D. (2008). Individual laboratory-measured discount rates predict field behavior. Journal of Risk & Uncertainty, 37(2-3), 237. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9053-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlton, S. R., & Fantino, E. (2008). Commodity specific rates of temporal discounting: Does metabolic function underlie differences in rates of discounting? Behavioural Processes, 77(3), 334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2007.08.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. DeHart, W. B., & Odum, A. L. (2015). The effects of the framing of time on delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 10. doi: 10.1002/jeab.125.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. The Psychological Record, 52(4), 479–492.Google Scholar
  13. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Air pollution emissions overview. Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/emissns.html
  14. Estle, S. J., Green, L., Myerson, J., & Holt, D. (2006). Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory and Cognition, 34, 914–928.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Franck, C. T., Koffarnus, M. N., House, L. L., & Bickel, W. K. (2015). Accurate characterization of delay discounting: A multiple model approach using approximate bayesian model selection and a unified discounting measure. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103(1), 218–233. doi: 10.1002/jeab.128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedel, J. E., DeHart, W. B., Frye, C. C. J., Rung, J. M., & Odum, A. L. (2016). Discounting of qualitatively different delayed health outcomes in current and never smokers. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 24(1), 18–29. doi: 10.1037/pha0000062.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedel, J. E., DeHart, W. B., Madden, G. J., & Odum, A. L. (2014). Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: Discounting of monetary and consumable outcomes in current and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 231(23), 4517–4526. doi: 10.1007/s00213-014-3597-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Frye, C. C., Galizio, A., Friedel, J. E., DeHart, W. B., & Odum, A. L. (2016). Measuring delay discounting in humans using an adjusting amount task. Journal of Visualized Experiments : JoVE, 107, e53584. doi: 10.3791/53584.Google Scholar
  19. Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 329. doi: 10.1037/a0016433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hepburn, C., Duncan, S., & Papachristodoulou, A. (2010). Behavioural economics, hyperbolic discounting and environmental policy. Environmental & Resource Economics, 46(2), 189. doi: 10.1007/s10640-010-9354-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirsh, J. L., Costello, M. S., & Fuqua, R. W. (2015). Analysis of delay discounting as a psychological measure of sustainable behavior. Behavior and Social Issues, 24 doi: 10.5210/bsi.v24i0.5906
  22. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77(2), 129–146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2002.77-129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson, M. W., & Bickel, W. K. (2008). An algorithm for identifying nonsystematic delay-discounting data. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(3), 264. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.3.264.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, A. E., & Saunders, D. K. (2014). Time preferences and the management of coral reef fisheries. Ecological Economics, 100, 130. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplan, B., Reed, D., & McKerchar, T. (2014). Using a visual analogue scale to assess delay, social, and probability discounting of an environmental loss. The Psychological Record, 64(2), 261. doi: 10.1007/s40732-014-0041-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koffarnus, M. N., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T., & Bickel, W. K. (2013). Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: A review. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99(1), 32–57. doi: 10.1002/jeab.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lagorio, C. H., & Madden, G. J. (2005). Delay discounting of real and hypothetical rewards III: Steady-state assessments, forced-choice trials, and all real rewards. Behavioural Processes, 69(2), 173. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Langrish, J. P., Li, X., Wang, S., Lee, M. M. Y., Barnes, G. D., Miller, M. R., … & Jiang, L. (2012). Reducing personal exposure to particulate air pollution improves cardiovascular health in patients with coronary heart disease. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(3), 367. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1103898
  29. LeBoeuf, R. A. (2006). Discount rates for time versus dates: The sensitivity of discounting to time-interval description. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 43(1), 59. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.43.1.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lepeule, J., Laden, F., Dockery, D., & Schwartz, J. (2012). Chronic exposure to fine particles and mortality: An extended follow-up of the harvard six cities study from 1974 to 2009. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(7), 965. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104660.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Madden, G. J., Petry, N. M., Badger, G. J., & Bickel, W. K. (1997). Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control patients: Drug and monetary rewards. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 5(3), 256. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.5.3.256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazur, J. E. (1987). An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. In M. L. Commons, J. E. Mazur, J. A. Nevin, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative Analyses of Behavior (The Effect of Delay and of Intervening Events on Reinforcement Value, Vol. 5, pp. 55–73). Hillsdale: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  33. McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306(5695), 503–507. doi: 10.1126/science.1100907.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer, A. (2013). Intertemporal valuation of river restoration. Environmental & Resource Economics, 54(1), 41. doi: 10.1007/s10640-012-9580-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morrison, K. L., Madden, G. J., Odum, A. L., Friedel, J. E., & Twohig, M. P. (2014). Altering impulsive decision making with an acceptance-based procedure. Behavior Therapy, 45(5), 630. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2014.01.001.
  36. Myerson, J., & Green, L. (1995). Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64(3), 263–276. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-263.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76(2), 235. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.76-235.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Odum, A. L. (2011a). Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 427. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-423.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Odum, A. L. (2011b). Delay discounting: Trait variable? Behavioural Processes, 87(1), 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2011.02.007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Odum, A. L., & Rainaud, C. P. (2003). Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behavioural Processes, 64(3), 305. doi: 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00145-1.
  41. Peper, J. S., Koolschijn, P. C., & Crone, E. A. (2013). Development of risk-taking: Contributions from adolescent testosterone and the orbito-frontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(12), 2141–2150. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010). Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron, 66(1), 138. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Qualtrics. (2016). Qualtrics [computer software]. Provo: Qualtrics.Google Scholar
  44. Radu, P. T., Yi, R., Bickel, W. K., Gross, J. J., & McClure, S. M. (2011). A mechanism for reducing delay discounting by altering temporal attention. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 363. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.96-363.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Richards, T. J., & Green, G. P. (2015). Environmental choices and hyperbolic discounting: An experimental analysis. Environmental & Resource Economics, 62(1), 83. doi: 10.1007/s10640-014-9816-6.
  46. Rodzon, K., Berry, M. S., & Odum, A. L. (2011). Within-subject comparison of degree of delay discounting using titrating and fixed-sequence procedures. Behavioural Processes, 86(1), 164. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.09.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Samuelson, P. A. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. The Review of Economic Studies, 4(2), 155–161. doi: 10.2307/2967612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stein, J. S., Wilson, A. G., Koffarnus, M. N., Daniel, T. O., Epstein, L. H., & Bickel, W. K. (2016). Unstuck in time: Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette smoking. Psychopharmacology, 233(21-22), 3771–3778. doi: 10.1007/s00213-016-4410-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. van der Wal, A. J., Schade, H. M., Krabbendam, L., & van Vugt, M. (2013). Do natural landscapes reduce future discounting in humans? Proceedings Biological Sciences / the Royal Society, 280(1773), 20132295. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Viscusi, W. K., Huber, J., & Bell, J. (2008). The economic value of water quality. Environmental & Resource Economics, 41(2), 169. doi: 10.1007/s10640-007-9186-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). Aic model selection using akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(1), 192–196. doi: 10.3758/bf03206482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Why the far-distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 201. doi: 10.1006/jeem.1998.1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. World Health Organization. (2014). Burden of disease from household air pollution for 2012. Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from http://www.who.int/phe/health_topics/outdoorair/databases/FINAL_HAP_AAP_BoD_24March2014.pdf?ua=1
  54. World Health Organization. (2015). Ambient (outdoor) air quality and healthRetrieved on February 25, 2015 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs313/en/
  55. World Health Organization. (2017). million premature deaths annually linked to air pollution. Retrieved on December 2, 2016 from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/air-pollution/en/

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Meredith S. Berry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jonathan E. Friedel
    • 2
  • William B. DeHart
    • 2
  • Salif Mahamane
    • 2
  • Kerry E. Jordan
    • 2
  • Amy L. Odum
    • 2
  1. 1.Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations