Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Smokers’ Elevated Rates of Delay Discounting are Independent of Differences in Primary Personality Dimensions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although smokers have higher rates of delay discounting, the extent to which this depends on smoking habit and nicotine use is unclear. Because personality factors are correlated with both delay discounting and smoking, we assessed the extent to which the effect size for smoking and delay discounting was attenuated by using the primary dimensions of personality in Eysenck’s system – extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism – as covariates. Smokers (n = 367) and non-smokers (n = 421) completed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised (EPQ-R) and the Monetary Choice Questionnaire (MCQ) to measure delay discounting. Smokers had higher rates of delay discounting (d = .315). Although extraversion and psychoticism scores were higher for smokers than non-smokers, and were positively correlated with delay discounting, the effect size for smokers decreased only marginally when personality variables were used as covariates (d = .295). A stepwise regression analysis identified 7 EPQ-R items that best predicted delay discounting (R = .281); controlling for a subscale based on these items only reduced the effect size to d = .252, and among the smokers, nicotine dependence remained a significant predictor of delay discounting. Overall results indicate that smokers’ elevated delay discounting is independent of primary personality dimensions, and although correlational, are most consistent with the view that smoking habit and nicotine dependence are causally linked to changes in impulsive decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alessi, S., & Petry, N. (2003). Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure. Behavioural Processes, 64(3), 345–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amlung, M., Vedelago, L., Acker, J., Balodis, I., & MacKillop, J. (2016). Steep delay discounting and addictive behavior: a meta‐analysis of continuous associations. Addiction, 112(1), 51–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arai, Y., Hosokawa, T., Fukao, A., Izumi, Y., & Hisamichi, S. (1997). Smoking behaviour and personality: A population-based study in Japan. Addiction, 92(8), 1023–1033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arantes, J., Berg, M. E., Lawlor, D., & Grace, R. C. (2013). Offenders have higher delay‐discounting rates than non‐offenders after controlling for differences in drug and alcohol abuse. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18(2), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audrain-McGovern, J., Rodriguez, D., Epstein, L. H., Cuevas, J., Rodgers, K., & Wileyto, E. P. (2009). Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking? Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103(3), 99–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, J., Stanley, J., Wilson, N., Blakely, T., & Edwards, R. (2016). Smoking prevalence in New Zealand from 1996-2015: A critical review of national data sources to inform progress toward the smokefree 2025 goal. New Zealand Medical Journal, 129, 11–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barratt, E. S. (1985). Impulsiveness subtraits: Arousal and information processing. Motivation, emotion, and personality, 5, 137–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. T., Petrides, K. V., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1998). The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire : An examination of the factorial similarity of P, E, N, and L across 34 countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 805–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batty, G. D., Deary, I. J., & Macintyre, S. (2007). Childhood IQ in relation to risk factors for premature mortality in middle-aged persons : The Aberdeen Children of the 1950s study. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 61(3), 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO FFI): Professional manual: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • de Wit, H., Flory, J. D., Acheson, A., McCloskey, M., & Manuck, S. B. (2007). IQ and nonplanning impulsivity are independently associated with delay discounting in middle-aged adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(1), 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daugherty, J. R., & Brase, G. L. (2010). Taking time to be healthy: Predicting health behaviors with delay discounting and time perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(2), 202–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health & Human Services (2014). The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 17.

  • Díaz, A., & Pickering, A. D. (1993). The relationship between Gray's and Eysenck's personality spaces. Personality and Individual Differences, 15(3), 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiFranza, J. R., Morello, P., & Gershenson, B. (2012). The retest reliability of nicotine dependence measures. Addiction Research & Theory, 20(1), 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. (1973). Personality and the maintenance of the smoking habit. In Dunn W. (Ed.), Smoking behavior: Motives and incentives. Washington: V. H. Winston, 1973, pp. 136–147.

  • Eysenck, H., Tarrant, M., Woolf, M., & England, L. (1960). Smoking and personality. British Medical Journal, 1(5184), 1456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality (Vol. 689): Transaction publishers.

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1992). Four ways five factors are not basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(6), 667–673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, H. J., & Eaves, L. (1980). Causes and effects of smoking. Sage Public, Beverly Hills, CA. 1980.

  • Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1977). The place of impulsiveness in a dimensional system of personality description. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 16(1), 57–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Impulsiveness and venturesomeness: their position in a dimensional system of personality description. Psychological reports.

  • Eysenck, S. B., Eysenck, H. J., & Barrett, P. (1985a). A revised version of the psychoticism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(1), 21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, S. B., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985b). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 613–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerström, K., Russ, C., Yu, C.-R., Yunis, C., & Foulds, J. (2012). The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence as a predictor of smoking abstinence: A pooled analysis of varenicline clinical trial data. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 14(12), 1467–1473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farsalinos, K. E., & Polosa, R. (2014). Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review. Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 5(2), 67–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, L. S., & Deary, I. J. (2004). Intelligence predicts health and longevity, but why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grace, R. C., Kivell, B. M., & Laugesen, M. (2014). Estimating cross-price elasticity of e-cigarettes using a simulated demand procedure. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17(5), 592–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2010). Experimental and correlational analyses of delay and probability discounting (pp. 67–92). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakulinen, C., Hintsanen, M., Munafò, M. R., Virtanen, M., Kivimäki, M., Batty, G. D., et al. (2015). Personality and smoking: individual‐participant meta‐analysis of nine cohort studies. Addiction, 110(11), 1844–1852.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, A. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Martin, N. G. (1994). Testing a model for the genetic structure of personality: a comparison of the personality systems of Cloninger and Eysenck. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 762.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerstrom, K. O. (1991). The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86(9), 1119–1127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Extraverted populations have lower savings rates. Personality and Individual Differences, 81, 162–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsh, J. B., Morisano, D., & Peterson, J. B. (2008). Delay discounting: Interactions between personality and cognitive ability. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1646–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, B. A., Amlung, M., Reed, D. D., Jarmolowicz, D. P., McKerchar, T. L., & Lemley, S. M. (2016). Automating scoring of delay discounting for the 21-and 27-item monetary choice questionnaires. The Behavior Analyst, 39(2), 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. N., & Maraković, N. N. (1996). Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(1), 100–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. N., & Petry, N. M. (2004). Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non‐drug‐using controls. Addiction, 99(4), 461–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K. N., Petry, N. M., & Bickel, W. K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(1), 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2011). Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychopharmacology, 216(3), 305–321.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 2, 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, L., & Wood, R. L. (2008). Using a temporal discounting paradigm to measure decision-making and impulsivity following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. Brain Injury, 22(9), 715–721.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. H. (1999). Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers. Psychopharmacology, 146(4), 455–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. H. (2004). Measuring impulsivity and modeling its association with cigarette smoking. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3(4), 261–275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Munafo, M. R., Zetteler, J. I., & Clark, T. G. (2007). Personality and smoking status: A meta-analysis. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 9(3), 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, J., Green, L., & Warusawitharana, M. (2001). Area under the curve as a measure of discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76(2), 235–243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, A. L. (2011a). Delay discounting: I'm a k, you're a k. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96(3), 427–439.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, A. L. (2011b). Delay discounting: trait variable? Behavioural Processes, 87(1), 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmura, Y., Takahashi, T., & Kitamura, N. (2005). Discounting delayed and probabilistic monetary gains and losses by smokers of cigarettes. Psychopharmacology, 182(4), 508–515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostaszewski, P. (1996). The relation between temperament and rate of temporal discounting. European Journal of Personality, 10(3), 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostaszewski, P. (1997). Temperament and the discounting of delayed and probabilistic rewards: Conjoining European and American psychological traditions. European Psychologist, 2(1), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petry, N. M. (2001). Pathological gamblers, with and without substance abuse disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(3), 482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (1995). Personality processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamosh, N. A., & Gray, J. R. (2008). Delay discounting and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 36(4), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, L., Markon, K. E., & Clark, L. A. (2014). Toward a theory of distinct types of “impulsive” behaviors: A meta-analysis of self-report and behavioral measures. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M. (1970). Personality and smoking: A review of the empirical literature. Learning Mechanisms in Smoking, 42-61.

  • Spielberger, C. D., & Jacobs, G. A. (1982). Personality and smoking behavior. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46(4), 396–403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, D. J., & Tunney, R. J. (2012). Effects of measurement methods on the relationship between smoking and delay reward discounting. Addiction, 107(5), 1003–1012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weidberg, S., González-Roz, A., & Secades-Villa, R. (2016). Delay discounting in e-cigarette users, current and former smokers. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 17(1), 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, R. E., Cook, E. W., Avsar, K. B., & Cox, J. E. (2008). Obese women show greater delay discounting than healthy-weight women. Appetite, 51(3), 563–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2008). WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic: the MPOWER package. Retrived from http://www.who.int/tobacco/mpower/gtcr_download/en/.

  • Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand

    Cindy P. Ku, Megan R. Tucker, Murray Laugesen & Randolph C. Grace

  2. University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Audrey McKinlay

Authors
  1. Cindy P. Ku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Megan R. Tucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Murray Laugesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Audrey McKinlay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Randolph C. Grace
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randolph C. Grace.

Ethics declarations

All procedures and materials were approved by the University of Canterbury Human Ethics Committee (HEC-2013/25) and were in accord with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Funding

This study was funded by a New Zealand Lottery Health Research grant (#353091).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ku, C.P., Tucker, M.R., Laugesen, M. et al. Smokers’ Elevated Rates of Delay Discounting are Independent of Differences in Primary Personality Dimensions. Psychol Rec 67, 213–221 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0226-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-017-0226-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation