Abstract
Behavioral contrast occurs when a change in the rate of reinforcement in one context results in a change in behavior in the opposite direction in another context. Research findings with nonhumans regarding the symmetry of positive and negative contrast have been mixed, especially regarding the relative influence of preceding and following schedules of reinforcement. Research has also been mixed regarding the extent to which systematic within-session contrast is demonstrated. Despite applied implications of contrast, the vast majority of research has been conducted with nonhumans. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the differential influence of preceding- and following-schedules of reinforcement on positive and negative behavioral contrast, as well as within-session contrast, with adult humans with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities in a 3-component human-operant arrangement. Positive contrast was found in 5 of 6 cases, whereas negative contrast was found in only 2 of 6. The effect of the following schedule was larger with positive contrast, but the effect of the preceding schedule was larger with negative contrast. There were no systematic within-session effects characteristic of behavioral contrast.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Binkley, K. A., Webber, E. S., Powers, D. D., & Cromwell, H. C. (2014). Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat. Behavioural Processes, 107, 167–174. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.07.011.
Charlop, M. H., Kurtz, P. F., & Milstein, J. P. (1992). Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(4), 795–808. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-795.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Edwards, R. P. (1979). Behavioral contrast in humans with response-independent reinforcement. The Journal of General Psychology, 100(1), 159–160. doi:10.1080/00221309.1979.9710535.
Ettinger, R. H., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1982). Behavioral competition, component duration, and multiple-schedule contrast. Behavioural Analysis Letters, 2, 31–38.
Fagen, J. W. (1979). Behavioral contrast in infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 2(2), 101–108. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(79)80015-6.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Fisher, W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(2), 491–498. doi:10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
Fleshler, M., & Hoffmann, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5(4), 529–530. doi:10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529.
Halliday, M. S., & Boakes, R. A. (1971). Behavioral contrast and response independent reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 16(3), 429–434. doi:10.1901/jeab.1971.16-429.
Halliday, M. S., & Boakes, R. A. (1974). Behavioral contrast without response-rate reduction. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22(3), 453–462. doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.22-453.
Hantula, D. A., & Crowell, C. R. (1994). Behavioral contrast in a two-option analogue task of financial decision making. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(4), 607–617. doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-607.
Johnson, C. M., & Kaye, J. H. (1979). Behavioral contrast during the acquisition of speechreading. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 49, 171–180. doi:10.2466/pms.1979.49.1.171.
Kiernan, C., & Alborz, A. (1996). Persistence and change in challenging and problem behaviours of young adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 9(3), 181–193. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.1996.tb00108.x.
Killeen, P. R. (2014). A theory of behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 102(3), 363–390. doi:10.1002/jeab.107.
Kistner, J., Hammer, D., Wolfe, D., Rothblum, E., & Drabman, R. S. (1982). Teacher popularity and contrast effects in a classroom token economy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15(1), 85–96. doi:10.1901/jaba.1982.15-85.
Koegel, R. L., Egel, A. L., & Williams, J. A. (1980). Behavioral contrast and generalization across settings in the treatment of autistic children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30(3), 422–437. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(80)90048-X.
Lerman, D. C. (2003). From the laboratory to community application: translational research in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(4), 415–419. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-415.
Mace, F. C., & Critchfield, T. S. (2010). Translational research in behavior analysis: historical traditions and imperatives for the future. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93(3), 293–312. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-293.
Matson, J. L., & Rivet, T. T. (2008). Characteristics of challenging behaviours in adults with autistic disorder, PDD-NOS, and intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33(4), 323–329. doi:10.1080/1366825080249260.
McSweeney, F. K. (1982). Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(2), 281–293. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-281.
McSweeney, F. K., Dougan, J. D., Higa, J., & Farmer, V. A. (1986). Behavioral contrast as a function of component duration and baseline rate of reinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 14(2), 173–193.
McSweeney, F. K., & Melville, C. L. (1991). Behavioral contrast as a function of component duration for leverpressing using a within-session procedure. Animal Learning & Behavior, 19(1), 71–80. doi:10.3758/BF03197862.
McSweeney, F. K., Swindell, S., Murphy, E. S., & Kowal, B. P. (2004). The relation of multiple-schedule behavioral contrast to deprivation, time in session, and within-session changes in responding. Learning & Behavior, 32(2), 190–201. doi:10.3758/BF03196020.
Nevin, J. A., Mandell, C., & Atak, J. R. (1983). The analysis of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39(1), 49–59. doi:10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49.
O’Brien, F. (1968). Sequential contrast effects with human subjects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(5), 537–542. doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11-537.
Pliskoff, S. (1963). Rate-change effects with equal potential reinforcements during the “warning” stimulus. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6(4), 557–562. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-557.
Rachlin, H. (1973). Contrast and matching. Psychological Review, 80(3), 217–234. doi:10.1037/h0034325.
Rasmussen, E. B., & Newland, M. C. (2008). Asymmetry of reinforcement and punishment in human choice. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89(2), 157–167. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008.89-157.
Reynolds, G. S. (1961). Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(1), 57–71. doi:10.1901/jeab.1961.4-57.
Reynolds, G. S. (1963). Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6(1), 131–139. doi:10.1901/jeab.1963.6-131.
Rojahn, J., Matson, J. L., Lott, D., Esbensen, A. J., & Smalls, Y. (2001). The Behavior Problems Inventory: an instrument for the assessment of self-injury, stereotyped behavior, and aggression/destruction in individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(6), 577–588.
Rovee-Collier, C. K., & Capatides, J. B. (1979). Positive behavioral contrast in 3-month-old infants on multiple conjugate reinforcement schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32(1), 15–27. doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.32-15.
Shanab, M. E., & Kong, J. (1977). Failure to obtain positive behavioral contrast in the rat following extended acquisition. The Journal of General Psychology, 96(1), 95–102. doi:10.1080/00221309.1977.9920802.
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the p value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279–282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1.
Tarbox, J., & Hayes, L. P. (2005). Verbal behavior and behavioral contrast in human subjects. The Psychological Record, 55, 419–437. Retrieved from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/tpr/vol55/iss3/5.
Terrace, H. S. (1968). Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 11(6), 727–741. doi:10.1901/jeab.1968.11-727.
Terrace, H. S. (1974). On the nature of non-responding in discrimination learning with and without errors. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22(1), 151–159. doi:10.1901/jeab.1974.22-151.
Wahler, R. G., Vigilante, V. A., & Strand, P. S. (2004). Generalization in a child’s oppositional behavior across home and school settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37(1), 43–51. doi:10.1901/jaba.2004.37-43.
Waite, W., & Osborne, J. G. (1972). Sustained behavioral contrast in children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18(1), 113–117. doi:10.1901/jeab.1972.18-113.
Weatherly, J. N., Melville, C. L., Swindell, S., & McMurry, A. S. (1998). Previous- and following-component contrast effects using a three-component multiple schedule. Behavioural Processes, 42, 47–59. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00063-6.
Weatherly, J. N., Melville, C. L., & McSweeney, F. K. (1996). Picking, pecking, and pressing: A cross-species demonstration of behavioral contrast. The Psychological Record, 46, 351–372. Retrieved from http://thepsychologicalrecord.siu.edu.
Williams, B. A. (1979). Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5(4), 379–396. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.5.4.379.
Williams, B. A. (1981). The following schedule of reinforcement as a fundamental determinant of steady state contrast in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35(3), 293–310. doi:10.1901/jeab.1981.35-293.
Williams, B. A. (1983). Another look at contrast in multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39(2), 345–384. doi:10.1901/jeab.1983.39-345.
Williams, B. A. (1988). The effects of stimulus similarity on different types of behavioral contrast. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16(2), 206–216. doi:10.3758/BF03209067.
Williams, B. A. (1992a). Competition between stimulus-reinforcer contingencies and anticipatory contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58(2), 287–302. doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.58-287.
Williams, B. A. (1992b). Inverse relations between preference and contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58(2), 303–312. doi:10.1901/jeab.1992.58-303.
Williams, B. A. (2002). Behavioral contrast redux. Animal Learning & Behavior, 30(1), 1–20. doi:10.3758/BF03192905.
Williams, B. A., & McDevitt, M. A. (2001). Competing sources of stimulus value in anticipatory contrast. Animal Learning & Behavior, 29(4), 302–310. doi:10.3758/BF03192897.
Williams, B. A., & Wixted, J. T. (1986). An equation for behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45(1), 47–62. doi:10.1901/jeab.1986.45-47.
Wilton, R. N., & Gay, R. A. (1969). Behavioral contrast in one component of a multiple schedule as a function of the reinforcement conditions operating in the following component. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12(2), 239–246. doi:10.1901/jeab.1969.12-239.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Cynthia Pietras for her comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. The authors would also like to thank Kerry Jordan and Gregory Madden for their helpful suggestions during the course of this project. Finally, the authors wish to thank Casey Clay, Chase Callard, and Rickie Ivory for assistance in data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest with this submission.
Research with Human Subjects
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boyle, M.A., Samaha, A.L., Slocum, T.A. et al. A Human-Operant Investigation of Preceding- and Following-Schedule Behavioral Contrast. Psychol Rec 66, 381–394 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0179-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0179-y