The successive matching-to-sample (go/no-go) procedure has been shown to be an effective procedure for reducing stimulus-control digressions in conditional-relation training with nonhuman subjects. In addition, comparison of acquisition between symmetrical and nonsymmetrical conditional discriminations may be one effective way to evaluate the properties of equivalence relations. This study evaluated symmetry (one of the properties of equivalence relations) using both of these methods with two capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.). The acquisition of symmetric (Condition A) and nonsymmetric (Condition B) conditional discriminations was compared. In both conditions, two forward (AB) and two backward (BA) relations were simultaneously trained. New stimuli were used in each condition. The data demonstrated that the method reported here was an efficient way to assess the property of symmetry, which was clearly present in the conditional relations learned by one of the subjects (Conditions A1 and A2) and possibly absent in the conditional relations learned by the other (Condition A1). The present study supports the argument that the comparison of the acquisition of forward and backward relations, that are trained simultaneously, is a promising procedure for evaluating the properties of equivalence relations in nonhuman subjects.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Alfaro, J. W. L., Silva, J. D., Jr., & Rylands, A. B. (2012). How different are robust and gracile capuchin monkeys? An argument for the use of Sapajus and Cebus. American Journal of Primatology, 74, 273–286.
Barros, R. S., Galvão, O. F., & Fontes, J. C. S. (1996). A symmetry test after conditional relation training with locations as stimuli in a Ateles paniscus paniscus monkey. Acta Comportamentalia, 4, 181–204.
Barros, R. S., Picanço, C. R. F., Costa, T. D., & Souza, C. B. A. (2012). Learning-set of simple discrimination reversals in capuchin monkey. Interação em Psicologia (Online), 16, 1–12.
Boelens, H. (2002). Studying stimulus equivalence: defense of the two-choice procedure. The Psychological Record, 52, 305–314.
Brino, A. L. F. (2007). Stimulus relation training and testing procedures in Cebus apella. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Belém, Brasil: Universidade Federal do Pará.
Brino, A. L. F., Galvão, O. F., & Barros, R. S. (2009). Successive identity matching to sample tests without reinforcement in Cebus apella. Ciências & Cognição, 14, 2–15.
Brino, A. L. F., Galvão, O. F., Picanço, C. R. F., Barros, R. S., Souza, C. B. A., Goulart, P. R. K., & McIlvane, W. J. (in press). Generalized identity matching to sample after multiple-exemplar training in capuchin monkeys. The Psychological Record.
Cruz, I. R. N., Picanço, C. R. F., & Barros, R. S. (2010). The use of mask procedure to evaluate stimulus control relations in capuchin monkeys. Brazilian Journal of Behavior Analysis, 6, 55–66.
Cumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1961). Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 281–284.
Cumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
D’Amato, M. R., Salmon, D. P., Loukas, E., & Tomie, A. (1985). Symmetry and transitivity of conditional relations in monkeys (Cebus apella) and pigeons (Columba livia). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 35–47. doi:10.1901/jeab.1985.44-35.
Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1996). Some implications of a stimulus control topography analysis for emergent stimulus class. In T. R. Zental & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 197–218). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.73-5.
Dymond, S., Gomez-Martin, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). Multi-modal conditional discrimination in rats: some preliminary findings. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 17, 269–281. doi:10.1080/3033910.1996.
Frank, A. J. (2007). An examination of the temporal and spatial stimulus control in emergent symmetry in pigeons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa.
Frank, A. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 147–165.
Galvão, O. F., Calcagno, S., & Sidman, M. (1992). Testing for emergent performances in extinction. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 10, 18–20.
Galvão, O. F., Barros, R. S., Lima, S. B., Lavratti, C. M., Santos, J. R., Brino, A. L. F., & McIlvane, W. J. (2005). Extent and limits of the matching concept in Cebus apella: a matter of experimental control? The Psychological Record, 55, 219–232.
García, A., & Benjumea, A. (2006). The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as proprioceptive samples in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 86, 65–80.
Gray, L. (1966). Backward association in pigeons. Psychonomic Science, 4, 333–334.
Hogan, D. E., & Zentall, T. R. (1977). Backward associations in pigeon. American Journal of Psychology, 90, 3–15.
Holmes, P. W. (1979). Transfer of matching performance in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 31, 103–114. doi:10.1901/jeab.1979.31-103.
Iversen, I. H. (1997). Matching-to-sample performance in rats: a case of mistaken identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 297–304.
Iversen, I. H., Sidman, M., & Carrigan, P. (1986). Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 297–304.
Johnson, C., & Sidman, M. (1993). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 333–347. doi:10.1901/jeab.1993.59-333.
Kastak, D., & Schusterman, R. J. (1994). Transfer of visual identity matching-to-sample in two California sealions (Zalophus californianus). Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 427–435
Kastak, C. R., Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131–158.
Konorski, J. (1959). A new method of physiological investigation of recent memory in animals. Bulletin De L'Academie Polonaise Des Sciences, 7, 115–117.
Kuno, H., Kitadate, T., & Iwamoto, T. (1994). Formation of transitivity in conditional matching to sample by pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 399–408. doi:10.1901/jeab.1994.62-399.
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2009). The search for symmetry: 25 years in review. Learning & Behavior, 37, 188–203. doi:10.3758/LB.37.2.188.
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1998). Control by location in pigeons matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 235–251.
Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and a test of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467–495.
Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F. M., & Matthijs, M. (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395–409. doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.49-395.
Manabe, K., Kawashima, T., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1995). Differential vocalization in budgerigars: towards an experimental analysis of naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 111–126. doi:10.1901/jeab.1995.63-111.
Richards, R. W. (1988). The question of bidirectional associations in pigeons’ learning of conditional discrimination tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 26, 577–579.
Rodewald, H. K. (1974). Symbolic matching-to-sample by pigeons. Psychological Reports, 34, 987–990.
Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823–839.
Sidman, M. (1980). A note on the measurement of conditional discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 285–289. doi:10.1901/jeab.1980.33-285.
Sidman, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analysis, 22, 11–18.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146. doi:10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127.
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching-to-sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5.
Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunninghan, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discrimination of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-23.
Tomonaga, M. (2008). (Non-)emergence of symmetry in chimpanzees. Cognitive Studies, 15, 347–357.
Urcuioli, P. (2008). Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons’ equivalence-class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 257–282. doi:10.1901/jeab.2008.90-257.
Velasco, S. M., & Tomanari, G. A. Y. (2009). Efeitos do treino de discriminações condicionais sobre a aquisição de relações simétricas e transitivas [Effects of conditional discrimination training on the acquisition of symmetric and transitive relations]. Acta comportamentalia, 17, 97–116.
Velasco, S. M., & Tomanari, G. A. Y. (2011). Aprendizagem de relações simétricas ao longo do treino de discriminações condicionais [Learning symmetrical relations in conditional discrimination training]. Acta comportamentalia, 19, 149–162.
Velasco, S. M., & Tomonari, G. A. Y. (2014). Assessing derived conditional relations under reinforcement conditions. The Psychological Record, 64, 551–558. doi:10.1007/s40732-010-0056-5.
Velasco, S. M., Huziwara, E. M., Machado, A., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2010). Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 283–295. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.94-283.
Wasserman, E. A. (1976). Successive matching-to-sample in the pigeon: variations on a theme by Konorski. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 8, 278–282.
Yamamoto, J., & Asano, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). The Psychological Record, 45, 3–21.
This research was supported by grants from the Brazilian Coordination for Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) to the first author and from the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technologic Development (CNPq) to the second author. Additional support was provided by the Research Support Foundation of São Paulo State (FAPESP 08/57705-8) to the National Institute of Science and Technology on Behavior, Cognition and Education (INCT-ECCE).
Concerning our animals, readers of past articles from our laboratory may wonder why we have not mentioned the capuchin species Cebus apella in this text. Until recently, capuchins were broadly termed Cebus monkeys. Now, they are divided into two genera (cf. Alfaro et al. 2012): Sapajus (tufted) and Cebus (untufted). Our monkeys are of the former genus.
We thank Klena Sarges for medical-veterinarian assistance and Edilson F. Pastana for managing the animals. We also thank Olavo Galvão for sharing laboratory facilities, Gerson Tomanari for discussing the data with us, and Karen Lionello-DeNolf for reviewing previous version of the manuscript.
About this article
Cite this article
Picanço, C.R.F., Barros, R.S. Symmetry Evaluation by Comparing Acquisition of Conditional Relations in Successive (Go/No-Go) Matching-to-Sample Training. Psychol Rec 65, 131–139 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0096-x