The Psychological Record

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

Derived Rule Tacting and Subsequent Following by Slot Machine Players

Original Article

Abstract

During a slot machine gambling task, six adult participants wagered red or silver coins, which had no impact on the programmed contingencies of the game. Following baseline gambling, each participant was presented with a series of conditional discrimination training and testing trials to establish a self-rule that either the red or silver coins were somehow “better” to use. Tacting of the participant’s self-rule was measured using fill-in-the blank and multiple-choice procedures. Upon returning to slot machine gambling, five of six participants altered their response options among coin colors in accordance with newly derived self-rule. Implications for conceptual development of self-awareness and practical applications of self-awareness using Skinner’s framework of language are discussed.

Keywords

Gambling Rule following Verbal behavior Tacts Derived relations Addiction 

References

  1. Catania, A., Matthews, B. A., & Shimoff, E. (1982). Instructed versus shaped human verbal behavior: Interactions with nonverbal responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38(3), 233–248.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Catania, A. C., Horne, P., & Lowe, C. F. (1989). Transfer of function across members of an equivalence class. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 99–110.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixon, M. R. (2000). Manipulating the illusion of control: variations in gambling as a function of perceived control over change outcomes. The Psychological Record, 50(4), 705–719.Google Scholar
  4. Dixon, M. R., & Delaney, J. (2007). The impact of verbal behavior on gambling behavior. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. A. Lyons, M. R. Dixon, & G. R. Wilson (Eds.), Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 171–189). Reno: Context Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dixon, M. R., & Hayes, L. J. (1998). Effects of differing instructional histories on the resurgence of rule-following. The Psychological Record, 48, 275–292.Google Scholar
  6. Dixon, M. R., Hayes, L. J., & Aban, I. (2000). Accurate rules, inaccurate rules, and self-rules: Gambling as a verbally maintained behavior. The Psychological Record, 50, 687–704.Google Scholar
  7. Dixon, M. R., Nastally, B. L., Jackson, J. E., & Habib, R. (2010). Altering the near-miss effect in slot machine gamblers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 913–918. doi:10.1901/jaba.2009.42-913.
  8. Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. (2002). Utilizing a computerized video poker simulation for the collection of experimental data on gambling behavior. The Psychological Record, 52, 417–428.Google Scholar
  9. Dixon, M. R., Wilson, A. N., & Whiting, S. W. (2012). A preliminary investigation of relational network influence on horse-track betting. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 6(1), 23–36.Google Scholar
  10. Fantino, E. (2008). Behavior analysis: thriving, but how about its future? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89, 125–127.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hackenberg, T. D., & Joker, V. R. (1994). Instructional versus schedule control of humans' choices in situations of diminishing returns. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62(3), 367–383.Google Scholar
  12. Hayes, L. J., Thompson, S., & Hayes, S. C. (1989). Stimulus equivalence and rule following. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52(3), 275–291.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoon, A., Dymond, S., Jackson, J. W., & Dixon, M. R. (2007). Manipulating contextual control over simulated slot machine gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1, 109–122.Google Scholar
  14. Hoon, A., Dymond, S., Jackson, J. W., & Dixon, M. R. (2008). Contextual control of slot machine gambling: replication and extension. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3), 467–470. doi:10.1901/jaba.2008.41-46.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, T. E., & Dixon, M. R. (2009). Influencing children's pregambling game playing via conditional discrimination training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42(1), 73–81.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lesieur, H. R., & Blume, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144(9), 1184–1188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Malott, R., Whaley, D., & Malott, M. E. (1993). Elementary principles of behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Nastally, B. L., Dixon, M. R., & Jackson, J. W. (2010). Manipulating slot machine preference in problem gamblers through contextual control. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 125–129. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-125.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Poulin, C. (2002). An assessment of the validity and reliability of the SOGS-RA. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18, 67–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shimoff, E., Catania, A. C., & Matthews, B. A. (1981). Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 36, 207–220.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  22. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Cambridge: Prentice-Hall, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  24. Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addictive Behaviors, 27, 1–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weatherly, J. N., & Dixon, M. R. (2007). Toward an integrative behavioral model of gambling. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1, 4–18.Google Scholar
  28. Weatherly, J. N., & Meier, E. (2007). Studying gambling experimentally: the value of money. Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 1(2), 133–140.Google Scholar
  29. Weatherly, J. N., & Meier, E. (2008). Does providing accurate information about slot machines alter how participants play them? Analysis of Gambling Behavior, 2, 2–11.Google Scholar
  30. Weatherly, J. N., Thompson, B. J., Hodny, M., & Meier, E. (2009). Choice behavior of nonpathological women playing concurrently available slot machines: effect of changes in payback percentages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 895–900.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zlomke, K. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2006). Modification of slot-machine preferences through the use of a conditional discrimination paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39(3), 351–361. doi:10.1901/jaba.2006.109-04.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social WorkSaint Louis UniversitySt LouisUSA
  2. 2.Southern Illinois University, CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations