Abstract
Conditional discriminations established using a linear series training structure were shown in a previous study to be intact when unreinforced trials assessing such performance were presented interspersed among stimulus equivalence test trials. Experimenter-defined correct performance on these trials was seen both for participants responding in accordance with stimulus equivalence and for some participants who did not. The goal of the current study was to investigate the status of previously trained relations at the time of stimulus equivalence tests in further contexts. Experiment 1 investigated this following many-to-one conditional discrimination training with 20 adult participants. Experimenter-defined correct performance on probes for trained relations was observed for 16 out of 17 of participants who formed stimulus equivalence classes, as well as for all participants not responding in accordance with stimulus equivalence. In Experiment 2, 18 adult participants received linear series, many-to-one, or one-to-many conditional discrimination training and tests for stimulus equivalence with interspersed training trials. Subsequently, participants experienced three additional tests for derived and trained performance within a month of the original training. Continued testing and the passage of time had little effect on the stability of both learned and derived performance for participants initially responding in accordance with stimulus equivalence. Participants who failed to form stimulus equivalence classes in the initial test, but responded in line with the trained relations, displayed more varied performance over time. Results from both experiments indicate that the lack of stimulus equivalence performance is not commonly caused by a breakdown of trained relations at the time of the stimulus equivalence test.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arntzen, E. (2012). Training and testing parameters in formation of stimulus equivalence: Methodological issues. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 13, 123–135. Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org.
Arntzen, E., & Hansen, S. (2011). Training structures and the formation of equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 12, 483–503. Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org.
Arntzen, E., & Holth, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309–320. Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/journals/the-psychological-record.aspx.
Arntzen, E., Grondahl, T., & Eilifsen, C. (2010). The effects of different training structures in the establishment of conditional discriminations and the subsequent performance on the tests for stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 60, 437–462. Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/journals/the-psychological-record.aspx.
Challies, D. M., Hunt, M., Garry, M., & Harper, D. N. (2011). Whatever gave you that idea? False memories following equivalence training: A behavioral account of the misinformation effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 343–362. doi:10.1901/jeab.2011.96-343.
Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2008). Stimulus equivalence. In S. F. Davis & W. Buskist (Eds.), 21st Century Psychology (pp. 360–372). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Eilifsen, C., & Arntzen, E. (2009). On the role of trial types in tests for stimulus equivalence. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 187–202. Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org.
Fields, L., Hobbie-Reeve, S. A., Adams, B. J., & Reeve, K. F. (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703–724. Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/journals/the-psychological-record.aspx.
Fienup, D. M., & Dixon, M. R. (2006). Acquisition and maintenance of visual-visual and visual-olfactory equivalence classes. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 7, 87–98. Retrieved from http://www.ejoba.org.
Guinther, P. M., & Dougher, M. J. (2010). Semantic false memories in the form of derived relational intrusions following training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 329–347. doi:10.1901/jeab.2010.93-329.
Rehfeldt, R. A., & Hayes, L. J. (2000). The long-term retention of generalized equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 405–428. Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/journals/the-psychological-record.aspx.
Rehfeldt, R. A., & Root, S. (2004). The generalization and retention of equivalence relations in adults with mental retardation. The Psychological Record, 54, 173–186. Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/journals/the-psychological-record.aspx.
Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117–137. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.72-117.
Saunders, R. R., Wachter, J., & Spradlin, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95–115. doi:10.1901/jeab.1988.49-95.
Saunders, R. R., Saunders, K. J., & Spradlin, J. E. (1990). Long-term stability of equivalence relations in the absence of training or practice. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 95, 297–303. Retrieved from http://www.aaiddjournals.org/loi/ajmr.1.
Saunders, K. J., Saunders, R. R., Williams, D. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725–744. Retrieved from http://www.abainternational.org/journals/the-psychological-record.aspx.
Saunders, R. R., Drake, K. M., & Spradlin, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195–214. doi:10.1901/jeab.1999.71-195.
Sidman, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22. doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5.
Conflicts of Interest
The manuscript has not been submitted elsewhere and the authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eilifsen, C., Arntzen, E. Effects of Training Structure and the Passage of Time on Trained and Derived Performance. Psychol Rec 65, 1–12 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0067-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0067-2