The Training and Assessment of Relational Precursors and Abilities (TARPA) protocol was developed to assess the emergence of derived relational responding, which has been argued by relational frame theory (RFT) to be the key process underlying language. Previous research showed a correlation between the TARPA and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS) in several children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The current study advanced this work by correlating a more comprehensive and systematic TARPA protocol with the Preschool Language Scale, Fourth Edition (PLS-4), a mainstream performance-based language assessment, in 10 additional children with ASD (Experiment 1) and 13 typically developing children (Experiment 2). This study also involved a hierarchical analysis of the TARPA. Results showed (a) a strong and significant correlation between the TARPA and PLS-4 full scale and subscales, and (b) evidence to support the hierarchical structure of the TARPA. The implications of these and other findings are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Murphy, C. (2007a). Addressing the generativity of language: A late reply to Chomsky. In L. B. Zhao (Ed.), Autism research advances. New York, NY: Nova.
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Murphy, C. (2007b). Towards establishing generative language with children with autism. In B. S. Mesmere (Ed.), New autism research developments. New York, NY: Nova.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with more-than and less-than as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 531--558.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with opposite as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559--586.
Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for relational operants. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45--71.
Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Equivalence-equivalence as a model of analogy: Further analyses. The Psychological Record, 53, 349--372.
Casey, L. & Kerr, N. (1977). Auditory-visual discrimination and language prediction [Monograph]. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 137–155.
Dymond, S., May, R. J., Munnelly, A., & Hoon, A. E. (2010). Evaluating the evidence base for relational frame theory: A citation analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 33, 97--117.
Giurfa, M. Zhang, S., Jenett, A., Menzel, R. & Srinivasan, M.V. (2001). The concepts of sameness and difference in an insect. Nature, 410, 930--932.
Greer, R. D., & Ross, D. E. (2008). Verbal behavior analysis: Inducing and expanding new verbal capabilities in children with language delays. New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
Harmon, K., Strong, R., & Pasnak, R. (1982). Relational responses in tests of transposition with rhesus monkeys. Learning and Motivation, 13 (4), 495--504.
Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Kerr, N., Meyerson, L., & Flora, J. A. (1977). The measurement of motor, visual, and auditory discrimination skills [Monograph]. Rehabilitation Psychology, 24, 95–112.
Krus, D. J., Bart, W. M., & Airasian, P. W. (1975). Ordering theory and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Theta Press.
Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56(2), 201.
Lord, C., & McGee, J. P. (Eds.). (2001). Educating children with autism (Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council). Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Luciano, C., Gomez-Becerra, I., & Rodriguez-Valverde, M. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 349–365. doi:10.1901/jeab.2007.08-06.
Malott, R. W. (2003). Behavior analysis and linguistic productivity. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 11--18.
Marion, C., Vause, T., Harapiak, S., Martin, G. L., Yu, C. T., Sakko, G., & Walters, K. (2003). The hierarchical relationship between several visual and auditory discriminations and three verbal operants among individuals with developmental disabilities. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19, 91–105.
Martin, G.L., & Yu, D.C.T. (2000). Overview on research of the Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities test. Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 7(2), 10--36.
Moran, L., Stewart, I., McElwee, J., & Ming, S. (2010). Brief report: the training and assessment of relational precursors and abilities (TARPA): a preliminary analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(9), 1149–53.
Murphy, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2005). Derived manding in children with autism: synthesising Skinner’s Verbal Behavior with relational frame theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 445--462.
Sidman, M. (1986). The measurement of behavioral development. In N. A. Krasnegor, D. B. Gray, & T. Thompson (Eds.), Developmental behavioral pharmacology (Vol. 5). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2009). Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: An apparent inconsistency and clarification. The Behavior Analyst, 32(2). 309--317.
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). VB-MAPP: Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program. Concord, CA: AVB Press.
Reese, H. W. (1961). Transposition in the intermediate size problem by pre-school children. Child Development, 32, 311--314.
Rehfeldt, R. A., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). Derived relational responding: Applications for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Rehfeldt, R. A., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2007). Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective-taking in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorder. Psychological Record, 57(1), 23–47.
Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus function in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275--300.
Wright, A.A. & Delius, J.D. (1994). Scratch and match: Pigeons learn matching and oddity with gravel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 20, 108--112.
Zimmerman, I. L., Steiner, V. G., & Pond, R. E. (2002). Preschool language scale (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
Conflict of Interest
The authors hereby confirm the absence of any actual or potential conflict of interest regarding the present research.
About this article
Cite this article
Moran, L., Stewart, I., McElwee, J. et al. Relational Ability and Language Performance in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders and Typically Developing Children: A Further Test of the TARPA Protocol. Psychol Rec 64, 233–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0032-0
- Autism spectrum disorder
- Relational frame theory