The Psychological Record

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 329–338

Rule-Based Insensitivity and Delusion Maintenance in Schizophrenia

  • J. L. Monestès
  • M. Villatte
  • I. Stewart
  • G. Loas
Original Article

Abstract

A variety of cognitive mechanisms have been proposed to apprehend the maintenance of delusional beliefs, a typical feature of schizophrenia. However, none of these mechanisms takes into account the verbal properties of delusions. An alternative behavioral approach is proposed, which considers delusional beliefs as verbal rules and maintenance of delusions as a form of rule-based insensitivity to changing environmental contingencies. A pilot study is described in which patients formerly presenting with delusional ideas and control participants were exposed in a repeated measures design to three different instructional conditions, instructions, no instructions, and self-instructions, in the context of a non-signaled changing multiple reinforcement schedule. Results suggest that, in the presence of instructions, patients formerly presenting with delusional ideas demonstrate greater insensitivity to changes in schedule contingencies than control participants. While these findings are preliminary, they suggest that rule-based insensitivity to changing environmental contingencies constitutes a new promising way to approach maintenance of delusional beliefs.

Keywords

Delusions Belief maintenance Self-instruction Rule-governed behavior Schizophrenia 

References

  1. Bach, P., & Hayes, S. C. (2002). The use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to prevent the rehospitalization of psychotic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1129–1139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach, P., Gaudiano, B. A., Hayes, S. C., Herbert, J. D. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis: intent to treat, hospitalization outcome and mediation by believability. Psychosis, 1-9. doi:10.1080/17522439.2012.671349
  3. Baron, A., & Galizio, M. (1983). Instructional control of human operant behavior. The Psychological Record, 33, 495–520.Google Scholar
  4. Bentall, R. P. (1994). Cognitive biases and abnormal beliefs: towards a model of persecutory delusions. In A. S. David & J. Cutting (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Schizophrenia (pp. 337–360). Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Catania, A. C. (1991). Glossary. In I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior. Part 2 (pp. G1–G44). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  6. Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1989). An experimental analysis of rule-governed behavior. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 119–150). New-York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E. H., & Matthews, B. A. (1990). Properties of rule-governed behaviour and their implications. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice (pp. 215–230). Hove & London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Corcoran, R., Cahill, C., & Frith, C. D. (1997). The appreciation of visual jokes in people with schizophrenia: A study of 'mentalizing' ability. Schizophrenia Research, 24, 319–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Corcoran, R., Mercer, G., & Frith, C. D. (1995). Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: investigating "theory of mind" in people with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 17, 5–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Doody, G. A., Gotz, M., Johnstone, E. C., Frith, C. D., & Owens, D. G. (1998). Theory of mind and psychoses. Psychological Medicine, 28, 397–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudley, R. E. J., John, C. H., Young, A. W., & Over, D. E. (1997). Normal and abnormal reasoning in people with delusions. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36, 243–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., & Kuipers, E. (2001). Persecutory delusions: developing the understanding of belief maintenance and emotional distress. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1293–1306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., & Bebbington, P. E. (2002). A cognitive model of persecutory delusions. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 41, 331–347.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman, D., Garety, P. A., Kuipers, E., Fowler, D., Bebbington, P. E., & Dunn, G. (2007). Acting on persecutory delusions: the importance of safety seeking. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 89–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Frith, C. D., & Corcoran, R. (1996). Exploring 'theory of mind' in people with schizophrenia. Psychological Medicine, 26, 521–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaudiano, B. A., & Herbert, J. D. (2006). Acute treatment of inpatients with psychotic symptoms using Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: Pilot results. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 415–437.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Garety, P. A., & Freeman, D. (1999). Cognitive approaches to delusions: a critical review of theories and evidence. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 113–154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Garety, P. A., Hemsley, D. R., & Wessely, S. (1991). Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients: biases in performance on a probabilistic inference task. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 194–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I. S., & Korn, Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 237–256.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hemsley, D. R., & Garety, P. A. (1986). Formation and maintenance of delusions: a Bayesian analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 51–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Huq, S. F., Garety, P. A., & Hemsley, D. R. (1988). Probabilistic judgements in deluded and non-deluded subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40, 801–812.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaney, S., & Bentall, R. P. (1989). Persecutory delusions and attributional style. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 62, 191–198.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kinderman, P., & Bentall, R. P. (1996). Self-discrepancies and persecutory delusions: evidence for a model of paranoid ideation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 106–113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kinderman, P., & Bentall, R. P. (1997). Causal attributions in paranoia and depression: internal, personal, and situational attributions for negative events. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 341–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kinderman, P., & Bentall, R. P. (2000). Self-discrepancies and causal attributions: studies of hypothesized relationships. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 255–273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, J., & Park, S. (2005). Working memory impairments in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(4), 599–611. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.114.4.599.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyon, H. M., Kaney, S., & Bentall, R. P. (1994). The defensive function of persecutory delusions: evidence from attribution tasks. British Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 637–646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Maher, B. A. (1974). Delusional thinking and perceptual disorder. Journal of Individual Psychology, 30, 98–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Maher, B. A. (1988). Anomalous experience and delusional thinking: The logic of explanations. In T. F. Oltmanns & B. A. Maher (Eds.), Delusional Beliefs (pp. 15–33). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Maher, B. A. (1999). Anomalous experience in everyday life: its significance for psychopathology. The Monist, 82, 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moritz, S., & Woodward, T. S. (2006). A generalized bias against disconfirmatory evidence in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 142, 157–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rosenfarb, I. S., Newland, M. C., Brannon, S. E., & Howey, D. S. (1992). Effects of self-generated rules on the development of schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 107–121.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sarfati, Y. (2000). Deficit of the theory-of-mind in schizophrenia: clinical concept and review of experimental arguments. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 45, 363–368.Google Scholar
  36. Sharp, H. M., Fear, C. F., & Healy, D. (1997). Attributional style and delusions: an investigation based on delusional content. European Psychiatry, 12, 1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shimoff, E., & Catania, A. C. (1998). The verbal governance of behavior. In K. A. Lattal, M. Perone, & I. H. Iversen (Eds.), Handbook of human operant behavioral research methods. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  38. Startup, H., Freeman, D., & Garety, P. A. (2007). Persecutory delusions and catastrophic worry in psychosis: developing the understanding of delusion distress and persistence. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 523–527.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Torneke, N., Luciano, C., & Valdivia Salas, S. (2008). Rule-Governed Behavior and Psychological Problems. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8, 141–156.Google Scholar
  40. Vaughan, M. (1989). Rule-governed behavior in behavior analysis. A theoretical and experimental history. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior. Cognition, contingencies, and instructional control (pp. 97–118). New-York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  41. Woodward, T. S., Moritz, S., & Chen, E. Y. H. (2006a). The contribution of a cognitive bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) to delusions: a study in an Asian sample with first episode schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Schizophrenia Research, 83, 297–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Woodward, T. S., Moritz, S., Cuttler, C. C., & Whitman, J. (2004). A generalized cognitive deficit in integrating disconfirmatory evidence underlies delusion maintenance in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 67, 79.Google Scholar
  43. Woodward, T. S., Moritz, S., Cuttler, C. C., & Whitman, J. (2006b). The Contribution of a Cognitive Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence (BADE) to Delusions in Schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 605–617.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wulfert, E., Greenway, D. E., Farkas, P., Hayes, S. C., & Dougher, M. J. (1994). Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rule-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 659–671.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Yogev, H., Hadar, U., Gutman, Y., & Sirota, P. (2003). Perseveration and over-switching in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 61(2–3), 315–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zettle, R. D., & Hayes, S. C. (1982). Rule governed behavior: A potential theoretical framework for cognitive behavior therapy. In P. C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive behavioral research and therapy (pp. 73–118). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Monestès
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
  • M. Villatte
    • 2
  • I. Stewart
    • 3
  • G. Loas
    • 4
  1. 1.Mental Health ServiceUniversity of RéunionRéunionFrance
  2. 2.Evidence Based Practice InstituteSeattleUSA
  3. 3.National University of Ireland GalwayGalwayIreland
  4. 4.Cliniques Universitaires de Bruxelles, Hôpital ErasmeUniversité libre de Bruxelles (ULB)BrusselBelgium
  5. 5.Pôle de Santé MentaleCHU de la RéunionSaint-Pierre CedexFrance
  6. 6.Laboratoire Epsylon EA 4556MontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations