The Effect of Before and After Instructions on the Speed of Sequential Responding
Order judgements are slower and less accurate when reversed. That is, when participants see two events in a sequence (e.g., circle …square), they are quicker to report ‘Before’ statements (e.g., “Circle before Square”) than ‘After’ statements (“Square after Circle”). The current study sought to determine whether a reversal effect will also occur when participants are instructed to produce a sequence of responses. Twenty participants were trained to criterion on simple ‘Before’ and ‘After’ instructions that specified sequences of two responses (e.g., “Circle before Square”). In a subsequent test, participants produced instructed sequences (e.g., circle … square) more quickly and more reliably when instructed to choose one stimulus before another than when they were requested to choose one stimulus after another. The implications of these findings for current theories of relational responding are considered.
KeywordsBefore After Sequential responding Temporal instructions Relational responding Mutual entailment
- Dermer, M. L., & Rogers, J. G. (1997). Schedule control over following instructions comprised of novel combinations of verbal stimuli. The Psychological Record, 47, 243–260.Google Scholar
- Ebbinghaus, H. (1964/1885). Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
- Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Hyland, J. M., O’ Hora, D. P., Leslie, J. C., & Smyth, S. (2012). Sequential responding in accordance with temporal relational cues: a comparison of before and after. The Psychological Record, 62(3), 463–484.Google Scholar
- Microsoft. (1998). Visual Basic Version 6.Google Scholar
- O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51–75.Google Scholar
- O'Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. (2004). Derived relational networks as novel instructions: a possible model of generative verbal contro. The Psychological Record, 54, 437–460.Google Scholar
- Skiljan, I. (2007). IrfanView. Retrieved from http://www.irfanview.com.
- Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of Reinforcement. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar