Abstract
To recall a list of phonologically similar words is more difficult than to recall a list of phonologically dissimilar words; this is the well-known phonological similarity effect in verbal working memory. However, it is hypothesized that not all phonological aspects of a word would create the phonological similarity interference in verbal working memory. The present study examines the influence of different phonological characteristics of the to-be-memorized items on participants’ recall performance. Convergent results from two experiments revealed the phonological similarity effect was less evident with same tone materials. These results are discussed in terms of the role of tone in the phonological similarity effect in verbal working memory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and visual similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365.
Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.
Bauer, R. S., & Benedict, P. K. (1997). Modern Cantonese phonology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bower, G. H. (1970). Organizational factors in memory. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 18–46.
Chase, W. G., & Calfee, R. C. (1969). Modality and similarity effects in short-term recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 510–514.
Chen, H.-C., & Yip, M. C. W. (2001). Processing syllabic and sub-syllabic information in Cantonese. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 2, 199–210.
Cohen, J. D., MacWhinney, B., Flatt, M., & Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: a new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
Coltheart, V. (1993). Effects of phonological similarity and concurrent irrelevant articulation on short-term memory recall of repeated and novel word lists. Memory & Cognition, 21, 539–545.
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion, and memory span. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 429–432.
Copeland, D. E., & Radvansky, G. A. (2001). Phonological similarity in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 29, 774–776.
Craik, F. I. (1968). Two components in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 996–1004.
Fallon, A. B., Groves, K., & Tehan, G. (1999). Phonological similarity and trace degradation in the serial recall task: when CAT helps RAT, but not MAN. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 301–307.
Frankish, C. (1995). Intonation and auditory grouping in immediate serial recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 5–22.
Gupta, P., & MacWhinney, B. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition and verbal short-term memory: computational and neural bases. Brain and Language, 59, 267–333.
Hartley, T., & Houghton, G. (1996). A linguistically constrained model of short-term memory for nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 1–31.
Ho, H.-H., & Jiang, Y.-H. (1994). Word frequency in Hong Kong in the 90’s. Hong Kong: Research Institute of Humanities, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Kao, D. (1971). Structure of the syllable in Cantonese. The Hague: Mouton.
Karlsen, P. J., & Lian, A. (2005). Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality. Memory & Cognition, 33, 542–556.
Kilgour, A. R., Jakobson, L. S., & Cuddy, L. L. (2000). Music training and rate of presentation as mediator of text and song recall. Memory & Cognition, 28, 700–710.
LaPointe, L. B., & Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1118–1133.
Liu, I.-M., Wu, J.-T., Sue, I.-R., Chen, S.-C. (2006). Phonological mediation in visual word recognition in English and Chinese. In P. Li, L. H. Tan, E. Bates, O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics (vol. 1: Chinese, pp. 218–224). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
MacAndrew, D. K., Klatzky, R. L., Fiez, J. A., McClelland, J. L., & Becker, J. T. (2002). The phonological-similarity effect differentiates between two working memory tasks. Psychological Science, 13, 465–468.
Martin, R. C., Lesch, M. F., & Bartha, M. C. (1999). Independence of input and output phonology in word processing and short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 3–29.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S., & Kelley, M. R. (1999). Reversing the phonological similarity effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 45–53.
Nimmo, L. M., & Roodenrys, S. (2004). Investigating the phonological similarity effect: syllable structure and the position of common phonemes. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 245–258.
Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (1999). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there a detrimental effect on order information? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 367–394.
Saint-Aubin, J., Ouellette, D., & Poirier, M. (2005). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: is there an effect on all trials? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 171–177.
Saito, S. (1998). Effects of articulatory suppression on immediate serial recall of temporarily grouped and intonated lists. Psychologia, 41, 95–101.
Searleman, A., & Herrmann, D. (1994). Memory from a broader perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Serafine, M. L., Crowder, R. G., & Repp, B. H. (1984). Integration of melody and text in memory for songs. Cognition, 16, 285–303.
Serafine, M. L., Davidson, J., Crowder, R. G., & Repp, B. (1986). On the nature of melody: text integration in memory for songs. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 123–135.
Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91–127.
Sevald, C. A., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (1995). Syllable structure in speech production: are syllables chunks or schemas? Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 807–820.
Slowiaczek, L. M., McQueen, J. M., Soltano, E. G., & Lynch, M. (2000). Phonological representations in prelexical speech processing: evidence from form-based priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 530–560.
Soto-Faraco, S., Sebastián-Gallés, N., & Cutler, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental cues for lexical access in Spanish. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412–432.
Surprenant, A. M., Neath, I., & LeCompte, D. C. (1999). Irrelevant speech, phonological similarity, and presentation modality. Memory, 7, 405–420.
Tehan, G., & Fallon, A. B. (1999). A connectionist model of short-term cued recall. In J. Wiles & T. Dartnell (Eds.), Prospectives in cognitive science (pp. 221–237). Stamford: Ablex.
Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllable. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 145–152.
Van Ooijen, B. (1996). Vowel mutability and lexical selection in English: evidence from a word reconstruction task. Memory & Cognition, 24, 573–583.
Wilding, J., & Mohindra, D. (1980). Effects of subvocal suppression, articulating aloud and noise on sequence. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 247–261.
Xu, Y. (1991). Depth of phonological recoding in short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 19, 263–273.
Yang, Y.-F. (1997). Prosodic cues to syntactic boundaries. Acta Acustica, 22, 414–421.
Yip, M. C. W. (2000). Spoken word recognition of Chinese homophones: the role of context and tone neighbors. Psychologia, 43, 135–143.
Yip, M. C. W. (2001). Phonological priming in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Psychologia, 44, 223–229.
Yip, M. (2002). Tone. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yip, M. C. W. (2004a). Interference effects of possible-word constraints (PWC) in Cantonese speech segmentation. Psychologia, 47, 169–177.
Yip, M. C. W. (2004b). Possible-word constraints in Cantonese speech segmentation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33, 165–173.
Yip, M. C. W. (2007). Processing of segmental and tonal information of Chinese syllables. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 405–410.
Zhou, X., Qu, Y., Shu, H., Gaskell, G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2004). Constraints of lexical tone on semantic activation in Chinese spoken word recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 36, 379–392.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Carol Chan for her assistance in the present study and the constructive comments from Gerry Tehan and an anonymous reviewer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yip, M.C.W. What Is the Role of Tone in the Phonological Similarity Effect?. Psychol Rec 64, 115–122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0019-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0019-x