Skip to main content
Log in

“Food for Memory”: Pictorial Food-Related Memory Bias and the Role of Thought Suppression in High and Low Restrained Eaters

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Building on cognitive theory, the present study is the first to test whether high restrained eaters show an immediate and delayed memory bias for pictorial food cues and to investigate the effects of food-related thought suppression on memory.

Method

Seventy participants (including both high and low restrainers) were asked either to suppress thoughts about food (Suppression food) or about animals (Suppression animals) or to monitor thoughts about food (Control food) or about animals (Control animals). Afterward, all participants were exposed to pictures of food and animals, and they completed two free-recall tasks for these cues.

Results

High restrainers remembered more food cues than low restrainers (both immediately and after delay). Also, the latter group remembered fewer food words than animal words, whereas there was no such difference in high restrainers. Hence, the results provide support for a pictorial food-related memory bias in high restrainers. The effects of suppression are less straightforward, but there was some support for a brief but enhancing effect of food-related thought suppression on memory for food cues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We conducted the same ANOVA including only the female participants and found similar, yet less strong effects (given the reduction in statistical power). There was a trend for a main effect of Restraint group, F(1,53) = 2.88, p = 0.09, and for Suppression condition, F(3, 53) = 2.64, p = 0.06), in the same directions.

  2. The same ANCOVA including only the female participants yielded similar results, namely a trend for a main effect for Restraint group in the same direction, F(1, 50) = 2.97, p = 0.09.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Soetens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soetens, B., Roets, A. & Raes, F. “Food for Memory”: Pictorial Food-Related Memory Bias and the Role of Thought Suppression in High and Low Restrained Eaters. Psychol Rec 64, 105–114 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0016-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0016-0

Keywords

Navigation