The Psychological Record

, Volume 64, Issue 1, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Systematic Analyses of the Effects of Acceptance on Tolerance of Radiant Heat Pain

  • Anne Kehoe
  • Yvonne Barnes-HolmesEmail author
  • Dermot Barnes-Holmes
  • Carmen Luciano
  • Frank Bond
  • Mairéad Foody
Original Article


Numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of acceptance-based strategies for coping with pain. The current research comprised three studies (N = 186) that compared the effects of acceptance, distraction, and placebo protocols on the distress and tolerance of experimentally induced radiant heat pain. In Experiment 1, an acceptance intervention was associated with a significant increase in tolerance relative to baseline, distraction was not, and placebo was associated with a significant decrease. Experiment 1A comprised a revised Distraction 2 intervention that was compared with the original acceptance and placebo groups from Experiment 1. This explored the potential impact of defusion on the previous outcome for distraction. Indeed, the results indicated that Distraction 2 was not associated with increased tolerance. In Experiment 2, the Swamp Metaphor was removed from each intervention, but this had no direct impact on outcomes. Again, acceptance showed a significant increase in pain tolerance; distraction did not. The current research offers the first componential analysis of acceptance and distraction in the context of radiant heat pain.


Acceptance Distraction Radiant heat pain 


  1. Asmundson, G. J. G., Norton, P. J., & Norton, G. R. (1999). Beyond pain: the role of fear and avoidance in chronicity. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 97–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cioffi, D., & Holloway, J. (1993). Delayed costs of suppressed pain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 274–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahl, J., Wilson, K. G., & Nilsson, A. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: a preliminary randomized trial. Behavior Therapy, 35, 785–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gutierrez, O., Luciano, C., Rodriguez, M., & Fink, B. C. (2004). Comparison between an acceptance-based and a cognitive-control-based protocol for coping with pain. Behavior Therapy, 35, 767–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. W., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(6), 1152–1168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayes, S. C., Bisset, R. T., Korn, Z., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfard, I. S., Cooper, L. D., & Grundt. (1999a). The impact of acceptance versus control rationales on pain tolerance. The Psychological Record, 49(33–4), 7.Google Scholar
  7. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999b). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Dosheen Toarmino, J. P., Polusny, M. A., & McCurray, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.Google Scholar
  9. Jacob, M. C., Kerns, R. D., Rosenberg, R., & Haythornthwaite, J. (1993). Chronic pain: intrusion and accommodation. Behavior Research and Therapy, 31, 519–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marcks, B. A., & Woods, D. W. (2005). A comparison of thought expression to an acceptance-based technique in the management of personal intrusive thoughts: a controlled evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 433–445.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Masedo, A. I., & Esteve, M. R. (2007). Effects of suppression, acceptance and spontaneous coping on pain tolerance, pain intensity and distress. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(199–2), 09.Google Scholar
  12. McCracken, L. M. (1998). Learning to live with the pain: acceptance of pain predicts adjustments in persons with chronic pain. Pain, 74, 21–27.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2003). Coping or acceptance: what to do about chronic pain? Pain, 105, 197–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. McCracken, L. M., Zayfert, C., & Gross, R. T. (1992). The pain anxiety symptoms scale: development and validation of a scale to measure fear of pain. Pain, 50, 67–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McCracken, L. M., Vowles, K. E., & Eccleston, C. (2004). Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain, 107, 159–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. McMullen, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., Luciano, C., & Cochrane, A. (2008). Acceptance versus distraction: brief instructions, metaphors, and exercises in increasing tolerance for self-delivered electric shocks. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 122–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McNeil, D. W., & Rainwater, A. J. (1998). Development of the fear of pain questionnaire-III. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 21, 389–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Melzack, R. (1987). The short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain, 30, 191–197.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mullen, B., & Suls, J. (1982). The effectiveness of attention and rejection as coping styles: a meta-analysis of temporal differences. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 26, 43–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Osman, A., Breitenstein, J. L., Barrios, F. X., Gutierrez, P. M., & Kopper, B. A. (2002). The fear of pain questionnaire-III: further reliability and validity with non-clinical samples. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 25, 115–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paulhus, D. L. (1988). The balanced inventory of desirable responding. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 38–41). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Rhudy, J. L., & Meagher, M. W. (2000). Fear and anxiety: divergent effects on human pain thresholds. Pain, 84(1), 65–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Titchener, E. B. (1916). A textbook of psychology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Vowles, K. E., McCracken, L. M., & Eccleston, C. (2007). Processes of change in treatment for chronic pain: the contributions of pain, acceptance and catastrophizing. European Journal of Pain, 11, 779–787.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Kehoe
    • 1
  • Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dermot Barnes-Holmes
    • 1
  • Carmen Luciano
    • 2
  • Frank Bond
    • 3
  • Mairéad Foody
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNational University of Ireland MaynoothMaynoothIreland
  2. 2.Universidad de AlmeriaAlmeriaSpain
  3. 3.Goldsmiths CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations