River mouths are locations with high theoretical potential for harvesting salinity gradient energy (SGE) since waters of different salinities are abundant in these places. However, the net extractable SGE potential—or site-specific potential (SSP)—is determined not only by the available natural resources but also by the energy consumption required for operating the power plant. Particularly, the required inputs for water pretreatment prior to energy generation to preserve the proper functioning of the membranes and other components within the systems, have been identified as a major drawback for SGE generation from natural waters. In this paper, the required energy consumed during water pretreatment was estimated, comparing conventional and membrane-based methods. This energy input was included in the formulations of the SSP, as a function of the design flow of the power plant and was used to assess the extractable SGE potential at the Magdalena River mouth, a top-ten system for SGE generation worldwide. The results showed that water pretreatment produced an important reduction of the SSP in the case study, while high potentials were still found for appropriate design flows.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Al-Sarkal T, Arafat HA (2013) Ultrafiltration versus sedimentation-based pretreatment in Fujairah-1 RO plant: environmental impact study. Desalination 317:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.02.019
Alvarez-Silva O, Osorio AF (2015) Salinity gradient energy potential in Colombia considering site specific constraints. Renew Energy 74:737–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.08.074
Alvarez-Silva O, Winter C, Osorio AF (2014) Salinity gradient energy at river mouths. Environ Sci Technol Lett 1:410–415. https://doi.org/10.1021/ez500239n
Alvarez-Silva OA, Osorio AF, Winter C (2016) Practical global salinity gradient energy potential. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:1387–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.021
Bar-Zeev E, Perreault F, Straub AP, Elimelech M (2015) Impaired performance of pressure-retarded osmosis due to irreversible biofouling. Environ Sci Technol 49:13050–13058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03523
Bucs SS, Valladares Linares R, van Loosdrecht MCM, Kruithof JC, Vrouwenvelder JS (2014) Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems. Water Res 67:227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.005
Cipollina A, Micale G (2016) Sustainable energy from salinity gradients. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ebrahim SH, Abdel-Jawad MM, Safar M (1995) Conventional pretreatment system for the Doha Reverse Osmosis Plant: technical and economic assessment. Desalination 102:179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-9164(95)00052-4
Etter PC, Lamb PJ, Portis DH (1987) Heat and freshwater budgets of the Caribbean Sea with revised estimates for the Central American seas. J Phys Ocean 17:1232–1248. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1987)017%3c1232:HAFBOT%3e2.0.CO;2
Higgins A, Restrepo JC, Ortiz JC, Pierini J, Otero L (2015) Suspended sediment transport in the Magdalena River (Colombia, South America): hydrologic regime, rating parameters and effective discharge variability. Int J Sediment Res 22:2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsrc.2015.04.003
Isaacs JD, Seymour RJ (1973) The ocean as a power resource. Int J Environ Stud 4:201–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207237308709563
Jia Z, Wang B, Song S, Fan Y (2014) Blue energy: current technologies for sustainable power generation from water salinity gradient. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.049
Kingsbury RS, Liu F, Zhu S, Boggs C, Armstrong M, Call D, Coronell O (2017) Impact of natural organic matter and inorganic solutes on energy recovery from five real salinity gradients using reverse electrodialysis. J Memb Sci 541:621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2017.07.038
Labrecque R (2009) Exergy as a useful variable for quickly assessing the theoretical maximum power of salinity gradient energy systems. Entropy 11:798–806. https://doi.org/10.3390/e11040798
Monnot M, Laborie S, Cabassud C (2016) Granular activated carbon filtration plus ultrafiltration as a pretreatment to seawater desalination lines: impact on water quality and UF fouling. Desalination 383:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.12.010
O’Toole G, Jones L, Coutinho C, Hayes C, Napoles M, Achilli A (2016) River-to-sea pressure retarded osmosis: resource utilization in a full-scale facility. Desalination 389:39–51
Ortega S, Stenzel P, Alvarez-Silva O, Osorio AFAF (2014) Site-specific potential analysis for pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) power plants—the León River example. Renew Energy 68:466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.033
Osorio AFAF, Montoya RD, Ortiz JC, Peláez D (2016) Construction of synthetic ocean wave series along the Colombian Caribbean Coast: a wave climate analysis. Appl Ocean Res 56:119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.01.004
Pearce GK (2008) UF/MF pre-treatment to RO in seawater and wastewater reuse applications: a comparison of energy costs. Desalination 222:66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.05.029
Plata SL, Childress AE (2019) Limiting power density in pressure-retarded osmosis: observation and implications. Desalination 467:51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.05.013
Porcelli N, Judd S (2010) Chemical cleaning of potable water membranes: a review. Sep Purif Technol 71:137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.007
Post JW (2009) Blue Energy: electricity production from salinity gradients by reverse electrodialysis. Wageningen Universiteit, Wageningen
Post JW, Goeting CH, Valk J, Goinga S, Veerman J, Hamelers HVM, Hack PJFM (2010) Towards implementation of reverse electrodialysis for power generation from salinity gradients. Desalin Water Treat 16:182–193. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1093
Ratkje SK, Holt T, Fiksdal L (1986) Effect of biofilm formation on salinity power plant output on laboratory scale. AIChE Symp Ser 82:39–44
Restrepo JC, Ortíz JC, Pierini J, Schrottke K, Maza M, Otero L, Aguirre J (2014) Freshwater discharge into the Caribbean Sea from the rivers of Northwestern South America (Colombia): magnitude, variability and recent changes. J Hydrol 509:266–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.045
Restrepo JC, Schrottke K, Traini C, Ortíz JC, Orejarena A, Otero L, Higgins A, Marriaga L (2016) Sediment transport and geomorphological change in a high-discharge tropical delta (Magdalena River, Colombia): insights from a period of intense change and human intervention (1990–2010). J Coast Res 319:575–589. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-14-00263.1
Restrepo JC, Schrottke K, Traini C, Bartholomae A, Ospino S, Ortíz JC, Otero L, Orejarena A (2018) Estuarine and sediment dynamics in a microtidal tropical estuary of high fluvial discharge: Magdalena River (Colombia, South America). Mar Geol 398:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margeo.2017.12.008
Salamanca JM, Alvarez-Silva O, Tadeo F (2019) Potential and analysis of an osmotic power plant in the Magdalena river using experimental field-data. Energy 180:548–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.05.048
Salibi Z (2001) Performance of reinforced thermosetting resin pipe systems in desalination applications: a long-term solution to corrosion—the Arabian Gulf example. Desalination 138:379–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00287-9
Schaetzle O, Buisman JN (2015) Salinity gradient energy: current state and new trends. Engineering 1:164. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-ENG-2015046
Seyfried C, Palko H, Dubbs L (2019) Potential local environmental impacts of salinity gradient energy: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 102:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.003
Skilhagen SE, Dugstad JE, Aaberg RJ (2008) Osmotic power—power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients. Desalination 220:476–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.045
Stenzel P, Wagner H (2010) Osmotic power plants: potential analysis and site criteria. In: 3rd International conference on ocean energy, Bilbao, Spain, pp 1–5
Straub AP, Deshmukh A, Elimelech M, Straub AP (2015) Pressure-retarded osmosis for power generation from salinity gradients: is it viable? Energy Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02985F
Sun C, Xie L, Li X, Sun L, Dai H (2015) Study on different ultrafiltration-based hybrid pretreatment systems for reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 371:18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.05.020
Teuler A, Glucina K, Laine JM (1999) Assessment of UF pretreatment prior RO membranes for seawater desalination. Desalination 125:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(99)00126-5
Turney D, Fthenakis V (2011) Environmental impacts from the installation and operation of large-scale solar power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:3261–3270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.023
Valle-Levinson A (2010) Definition and classification of estuaries. In: Valle-Levinson A (ed) Contemporary issues in estuarine physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–10
Veerman J (2010) Reverse electrodialysis: design and optimization by modeling and experimentation. Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen
Vermaas DA, Kunteng D, Saakes M, Nijmeijer K (2013) Fouling in reverse electrodialysis under natural conditions. Water Res 47:1289–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.053
Vermaas DA, Veerman J, Saakes M, Nijmeijer K (2014a) Influence of multivalent ions on renewable energy generation in reverse electrodialysis. Energy Environ Sci 7:1434. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee43501f
Vermaas DA, Kunteng D, Veerman J, Saakes M, Nijmeijer K (2014b) Periodic feedwater reversal and air sparging as antifouling strategies in reverse electrodialysis. Environ Sci Technol 48:3065–3073. https://doi.org/10.1021/es4045456
Vrouwenvelder JS, Buiter J, Riviere M, van der Meer WG, van Loosdrecht MC, Kruithof JC (2010) Impact of flow regime on pressure drop increase and biomass accumulation and morphology in membrane systems. Water Res 44:689–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.09.054
Wang S, Wang S (2015) Impacts of wind energy on environment: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 49:437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.137
Wenten I (1996) Ultrafiltration in water treatment and its evaluation as pretreatment for reverse osmosis system. Dept Chem Eng Inst Teknol Bandung. email@example.com
Yip NY, Elimelech M (2014) Comparison of energy efficiency and power density in pressure retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis. Environ Sci Technol 48:11002–11012. https://doi.org/10.1021/es5029316
This work was funded by COLCIENCIAS—Department of Science, Technology and Innovation of Colombia—by the projects: 111870048985, resolution 1020-2014 and 121571451074, resolution 881-2015. The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the EXCEED-Swindon project framework.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarez-Silva, O., Maturana, A.Y., Pacheco-Bustos, C.A. et al. Effects of water pretreatment on the extractable salinity gradient energy at river mouths: the case of Magdalena River, Caribbean Sea. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 5, 227–240 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-019-00141-y
- Salinity gradient energy
- Water quality
- Water pretreatment
- Design flow
- Magdalena River mouth