Comparing nonlinear hydrodynamic forces in heaving point absorbers and oscillating wave surge converters

Abstract

Two of the most common modes of oscillation of single degree of freedom wave energy converters are heave and surge, which are, respectively, exploited by heaving point absorbers (HPAs), and oscillating wave surge converters (OWSCs). Given major hydrodynamic differences between HPAs and OWSC, different nonlinear forces may be more or less relevant. Likewise, the scaling properties of such nonlinear forces may be different, according to the type of device, introducing uncertainties. This paper studies different nonlinear effects, and the relevance of different hydrodynamic force components, in HPAs and OWSCs. Nonlinear Froude–Krylov forces, as well as viscous drag effects, are represented and both prototype and full-scale device sizing are considered. Results show that HPAs are predominantly affected by nonlinear Froude–Krylov forces, while the most important hydrodynamic forces in OWSCs are diffraction and radiation effects. In addition, viscous drag appears to have little relevance in HPAs, but a significant influence in OWSCs. Finally, nonlinearities are shown to significantly affect the phase of the different force components.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  1. Aquamarine (2016) Aquamarine power. http://www.aquamarinepower.com/

  2. Babarit A, Hals J, Muliawan M, Kurniawan A, Moan T, Krokstad J (2012) Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renew Energy 41:44–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bearman P, Downie M, Graham J, Obasaju E (1985) Forces on cylinders in viscous oscillatory flow at low keulegan-carpenter numbers. J Fluid Mech 154:337–356

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhinder MA, Babarit A, Gentaz L, Ferrant P (2011) Assessment of viscous damping via 3d-cfd modelling of a floating wave energy device. In: Proceedings of the 9th European wave and tidal energy conference, Southampton

  5. Bhinder MA, Babarit A, Gentaz L, Ferrant P (2012) Effect of viscous forces on the performance of a surging wave energy converter. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international and polar engineering conference, Rhodes, pp 545–549

  6. Bhinder MA, Babarit A, Gentaz L, Ferrant P (2015) Potential time domain model with viscous correction and cfd analysis of a generic surging floating wave energy converter. Int J Mar Energy 10:70–96. doi:10.1016/j.ijome.2015.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clabby D (2014) Wave energy conversion at prototype and model scales. PhD thesis, Queen’s University Belfast

  8. Clement A, Ferrant P (1988) Nonlinear water waves: IUTAM Symposium, Tokyo, August 25–28, 1987. In: Superharmonic waves generated by the large amplitude heaving motion of a submerged body. Springer, Berlin, pp 423–433

  9. Cummins W (1962) The impulse response function and ship motion. Schiffstechnik 9:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  10. Falnes J (2002) Ocean waves and oscillating systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  11. Folley M, Henry A, Whittaker T (2015) Contrasting the hydrodynamics of heaving and surging wave energy converters. In: Proceedings of the 11th European wave and tidal energy conference, Nantes

  12. Gilloteaux JC (2007) Mouvements de grande amplitude d’un corps flottant en fluide parfait. Application à la récupération de l’énergie des vagues. PhD thesis, Ecole Centrale de Nantes-ECN

  13. Giorgi G, Ringwood JV (2016) Computationally efficient nonlinear Froude–Krylov force calculations for heaving axisymmetric wave energy point absorbers. J Ocean Eng Mar Energy 3(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giorgi G, Ringwood JV (2017) Froude–krylov and viscous drag representations in nonlinear wave energy devices models in the computation/fidelity continuum. Ocean Eng 141:164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giorgi G, Penalba M, Ringwood JV (2016a) Nonlinear hydrodynamic force relevance for different wave energy converter types. In: Proceedings of the 3rd asian wave and tidal energy conference, pp 154–162

  16. Giorgi G, Penalba M, Ringwood JV (2016b) Nonlinear hydrodynamic models for heaving buoy wave energy converters. In: Proceedings of the 3rd asian wave and tidal energy conference, pp 144–153

  17. Hansen RH (2013) Design and control of the powertake-off system for a wave energy converter with multiple absorbers. Videnbasen for Aalborg UniversitetVBN, Aalborg UniversitetAalborg University, Det Teknisk-Naturvidenskabelige Fakultet, The Faculty of Engineering and Science

  18. Heller V (2011) Scale effects in physical hydraulic engineering models. J Hydraul Res 49(3):293–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keulegan GH, Carpenter LH (1956) Forces on cylinders and plates in an oscillating fluid. US Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards

  20. Lok K, Stallard T, Stansby P, Jenkins N (2014) Optimisation of a clutch-rectified power take off system for a heaving wave energy device in irregular waves with experimental comparison. Int J Mar Energy 8:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Merigaud A, Gilloteaux JC, Ringwood JV (2012) A nonlinear extension for linear boundary element methods in wave energy device modelling. In: ASME 2012 31st international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp 615–621

  22. Molin B (2002) Hydrodynamique des structures offshore. Editions Technip

  23. Morison JR, Johnson JW, Schaaf SA (1950) The force exerted by surface waves on piles. J Pet Technol 2(5):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taghipour R, Perez T, Moan T (2007) Hybrid frequency-time domain models for dynamic response analysis of marine structures. Ocean Eng 35(7):685–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wavestar (2016) Wavestar a/s. http://wavestarenergy.com/

  26. WAMIT Inc. (2013) WAMIT v7.0 user manual

  27. Whittaker T, Collier D, Folley M, Osterried M, Henry A, Crowley M (2007) The development of oyster a shallow water surging wave energy converter. In: Proceedings of the 7th European wave and tidal energy conference, Porto, pp 11–14

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is based upon work supported by Science Foundation Ireland under Grant no. 13/IA/1886.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Giorgi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giorgi, G., Ringwood, J.V. Comparing nonlinear hydrodynamic forces in heaving point absorbers and oscillating wave surge converters. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 4, 25–35 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-017-0098-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Heaving point absorber
  • Oscillating wave surge converter
  • Nonlinear Froude–Krylov force
  • Viscous drag