Abstract
This paper forms, optimizes, and evaluates three numerical approaches for characterizing mean velocities in far wake region behind ocean current turbines. These approaches are derived from wake models originally developed for wind turbines and are referred here as the Larsen/Larsen, Larsen/Ainslie, and Jensen/Ainslie approaches based on the researchers originally credited with developing the expressions for dependence of the mean wake velocity on centerline and/or radial locations. The numerical coefficients utilized by these approaches are optimized to best match Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) generated wake velocity data. After optimizing the coefficients, this study finds that the Larsen/Ainslie and Jensen/Ainslie approaches best match the CFD generated flow data, with Larsen/Ainslie being the best match for an ambient turbulence intensity (TI) of 3% and Jensen/Ainslie being the best match for TIs of 6 and 9%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainslie J (1988) Calculating the flowfield in the wake of wind turbines. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 27:213–224
Bachant P, Wosnik M (2014) Reynolds number dependence of cross flow turbine performance and near-wake characteristics. In: Proceedings of the second marine energy technology symposium, METS 2014, Seattle
Bahaj A, Molland A, Chaplin J, Batten W (2007) Power and thrust measurements of marine current turbines under various hydrodynamic flow conditions in a cavitation tunnel and a towing tank. Renew Energy 32:407–426
Bahaj AS, Myers LE, Thomson MD, Jorge N (2007) Chararcterizing the wake of horizontal axis marine current turbines. In: Proceedings of the 7th European wave tidal energy conference, Porto
Batten WMJ, Harrison ME, Bahaj AS (2013) Accuracy of the actuator disc-RANS approach for predicting the performance and wake of tidal turbines. The Royal Society Publishing, Philosophical Transactions A, London
Borghi M, Kolawole F, Gangadharan S, Engblom A, VanZwieten JH, Alsenas G, Baxley W, Ravenna S (2012) Design, fabrication and installation of a hydrodynamic rotor for a small-scale experimental ocean current turbine. Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon, Orlando
Duerr AES, Dhanak MR (2010) Hydrokinetic power resource assessment of the Florida Current. In: Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE oceans conference, Seattle, 20–23 September 2010
Frandsen S, Barthelmie R, Pryor S, Rathmann O, Larsen S, Højstrup J, Thøgersen M (2006) Analytical modeling of wind speed deficit in large offshore wind farms. Wind Energy 40–48
GeorgiaTech Research Corp (2013) Assessment of energy production potential from ocean currents along the United States coastline. GeorgiaTech Research Corp, Atlanta
Hansen MOL (2008) Aerodynamics of wind turbines. Earthscan 31–33
IHI Corporation (2014) Power generation using the Kuroshio Current: development of floating type ocean current turbine system. IHI Eng Rev 46(2)
Jensen N (1983) A note on wind generator interaction. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde
Larsen G (1988) A simple wake calculation procedure. Risø National Laboratory, Roskilde
Lawson M, Li Y, Sale DC (2011) Development and verification of a computational fluid dynamics model of a horizontal-axis tidal current turbine. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference ocean, offshore, arctic engineering, Rotterdam, 19–24 June 2011
Lee NJ, Kim IC, Kim CG, Hyun BS, Lee YH (2015) Performance study on a counter-rotating tidal current turbine by CFD and model experimentation. Renew Energy 79:122–126
Machado MCPM, VanZwieten JH, Pinos I (2016) A measurement based analyses of the hydrokinetic energy in the gulf stream. J Ocean Wind Energy ISOPE 3(1):25–30
Maganga F, Germain G, King J, Pinon G, Rivoalen E (2010) Experimental characterisation of flow effects on marine current turbine behaviour and on its wake properties. IET Renew Power Gener 4(6)
Mandas N, Cambuli F, Carcangiu CE (2006) Numerical prediction of horizontal axis wind turbine flow. In: Proceedings of the European wind energy conference and exhibition, Athens
Mycek P, Gaurier B, Germain G, Pinon G, Rivoalen E (2014) Experimental study of the turbulence intensity effects on marine current turbines behaviour, Part I: One single turbine. Renew Energy 66:729–746
Myers LE, Bahaj AS (2011) An experimental investigation simulating flow effects in first generation marine current energy converter arrays. Renew Energy 37:28–36
Sanderse B, van der Pijl SP, Koren B (2011) Review of computational fluid dynamics for wind turbine wake aerodynamics. Wind Energy 14:799–819
Sun X, Chick JP, Bryden IG (2008) Laboratory-scale simulation of energy extraction from tidal currents. Renew Energy 33(6):1267–1274
Tian W, VanZwieten JH, Pyakurel P, Li Y (2016) Influences of yaw angle and turbulence intensity on the performance of a 20 kW in-stream hydrokinetic turbine. Energy (in press)
U.S. Energy Information Administration (2015) Annual energy review. http://www.eia.gov/. Accessed 1 June 2016
VanZwieten JH, Baxley WE, Alsenas GM, Meyer I, Muglia M, Lowcher C, Bane J, Gabr M, He R, Hudon T, Steven R, Duerr AES (2015) SS marine renewable energy—ocean current turbine mooring considerations. In: Proceedings of the offshore technology conference, Texas
VanZwieten JH, Duerr A, Alsenas G, Hanson H (2013) Global ocean current energy assessment: an initial look. In: Proceedings of the marine energy technology symposium, Washington, D.C., 10–11 April 2013
VanZwieten JH, McAnally W, Ahmad J, Davis T, Martin J, Bevelhimer M, Cribbs A, Lippert R, Hudon T, Trudeau M (2014) In-stream hydrokinetic power—a review and appraisal. J Energy Eng 04014024
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and specifically the Energy, Power, Control and Networks (EPCN) program under Grant ECCS-1307889 ‘Collaborative Research: Optimized Harvesting of Hydrokinetic Power by Ocean Current Turbine Farms Using Integrated Control’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pyakurel, P., Tian, W., VanZwieten, J.H. et al. Characterization of the mean flow field in the far wake region behind ocean current turbines. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 3, 113–123 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-017-0075-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-017-0075-9