Abstract
Purpose of Review
To describe the design, intent, utilization, and limitations of austere resuscitative surgical care (ARSC) in modern combat operations.
Recent Findings
The dispersed nature of modern combat operations combined with growing recognition of the value of prompt surgical intervention for combat injuries has driven increased demand for small, mobile ARSC teams. Level 3 evidence suggests generally favorable outcomes for casualties treated by austere surgical teams when compared to initial treatment at higher echelons of care. Case-series have demonstrated the lifesaving potential of ARSC teams, although high-grade outcomes data is lacking. Standardized selection and training paradigms are needed for ARSC teams.
Summary
Modern combat operations are geographically dispersed and have trended toward small-scale, highly specialized operations. Specially trained ARSC teams fill a critical capability gap in preventing battlefield death. Integrated surgical and tactical training networks are needed to better prepare mobile medical teams for deployment to austere environments.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40719-021-00214-0/MediaObjects/40719_2021_214_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Stinger H, Rush R. The Army forward surgical team: update and lessons learned, 1997–2004. Mil Med. 2006;171(4):269–72. https://doi.org/10.7205/milmed.171.4.269.
Nolan DL. Airborne tactical medical support in Grenada. Mil Med. 1990;155(3):104–11.
Shanker T. Changes by Robert Gates kept US troops alive in Afghanistan. The Columbus Dispatch. 2015. https://www.dispatch.com/article/20151003/NEWS/310039745.
•• Montgomery HR, Drew B. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Update. J Spec Oper Med. 2020 Summer;20(2):152–153. Outlines the current “standard of care” for austere resuscitative and surgical care in the deployed environment.
Montgomery HR, Drew B. Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) Update. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(2):152–3.
Remick KN, Schwab CW, Smith BP, Monshizadeh A, Kim PK, Reilly PM. Defining the optimal time to the operating room may salvage early trauma deaths. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(5):1251–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000000218.
•• Baker JB, MD, Northern DM, MD, Frament C, PA, Baker DA, MD, Remick K, MD, Seery J, MD et al. Austere Resuscitative and Surgical Care in Support of Forward Military Operations—Joint Trauma System Position Paper. Military Medicine. 2021;186(1–2):12–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaa358. Up-to-date consensus opinion from leaders in deployed medicine on the implementation of austere surgical teams.
• Office of the Joint Staff Surgeon: Concept of Operations (CONOPS) for the Provision of Forward Resuscitative Care (FRC) in Support of Dispersed Operations. Washington DC: The Joint Staff; 2017. Outlines operational challenges faced by forward surgical teams in modern combat environments.
Benavides JM, Benavides LC, Hale DF, Lundy JB. The Golden Hour Offset Surgical Treatment Team Operational Concept: Experience of the 102nd Forward Surgical Team in Operation Freedom’s Sentinel 2015–2016. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(3):46–50.
D’Angelo M, Losch J, Smith B, Geslak M, Compton S, Wofford K, et al. Expeditionary Resuscitation Surgical Team: The US Army’s Initiative to Provide Damage Control Resuscitation and Surgery to Forces in Austere Settings. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(4):76–9.
• DuBose JJ, Martens D, Frament C, Haque I, Telian S, Benson PJ. Experience With Prehospital Damage Control Capability in Modern Conflict: Results From Surgical Resuscitation Team Use. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(4):68–71. A great, real-world, discussion of the capabilities and limitations of forward surgical teams.
• Northern DM, Manley JD, Lyon R, Farber D, Mitchell BJ, Filak KJ et al. Recent advances in austere combat surgery: Use of aortic balloon occlusion as well as blood challenges by special operations medical forces in recent combat operations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;85(1S Suppl 2):S98-s103. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000001966. Discusses application and impact of new technologies such as REBOA on modern combat casualty care.
• Satterly S, McGrane O, Frawley T, Bynum W, Martin J, Clegg C, et al. Special Operations Force Risk Reduction: Integration of Expeditionary Surgical and Resuscitation Teams. J Spec Oper Med. 2018;18(2):49–52. Proposes operational training paradigm that may help prepare austere surgical teams to succeed in far-forward combat environments.
Manley JTL, Alexander, Nam, Jason J. A case report of simultaneous hypotensive patients managed with concurrent REBOA in a single-surgeon, austere combat casualty environment. Endovasc Resuscit Trauma Manag. 2018;2(2):77–80. https://doi.org/10.26676/jevtm.v2i2.47.
•• Baker JB, Modlin RE, Ong RC, Remick KN. The SOF Truths for Army Special Operations Forces Surgical Teams. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(4):52–5. A transparent collection of pearls and pitfalls of special operations forward surgical teams.
•• Kotwal RS, Howard JT, Orman JA, Tarpey BW, Bailey JA, Champion HR, et al. The Effect of a Golden Hour Policy on the Morbidity and Mortality of Combat Casualties. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):15–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2015.3104. The most thorough and honest evaluation of the golden hour mandate and its effectiveness in decreasing battlefield death.
•• Howard JT, Kotwal RS, Santos-Lazada AR, Martin MJ, Stockinger ZT. Reexamination of a Battlefield Trauma Golden Hour Policy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000001727. Dives into further depth on the golden hour policy in modern combat operations, highlighting the benefits and potential shortfalls of the policies affect an combat casualty care.
THE MEDICAL DETACHMENT, FORWARD RESUSCITATIVE AND SURGICAL. TRADOC. ATP 4- 02.25. https://armypubs.army.mil/ProductMaps/PubForm/Details.aspx?PUB_ID=1021369.
Chowdhury MM, Dagash H, Pierro A. A systematic review of the impact of volume of surgery and specialization on patient outcome. Br J Surg. 2007;94(2):145–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5714.
Haut ER, Chang DC, Efron DT, Cornwell EE, 3rd. Injured patients have lower mortality when treated by “full-time” trauma surgeons vs. surgeons who cover trauma “part-time”. J Trauma. 2006;61(2):272–8; discussion 8–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000222939.51147.1c.
• Edwards MJ, Edwards KD, White C, Shepps C, Shackelford S. Saving the Military Surgeon: Maintaining Critical Clinical Skills in a Changing Military and Medical Environment. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(6):1258–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.03.031. A very timely piece that discusses the numerous challenges the military faces with regard to the maintenance of surgeons' skills necessary to deliver quality surgical care to the injured warfighter.
Newman L. New trauma training program prepares surgical team for deployment. Health.mil. 2020. https://health.mil/News/Articles/2020/06/08/New-trauma-training-program-prepares-surgical-team-for-deployment. Accessed 30 Mar 2021 2021.
Audit of Training of Mobile Medical Teams in the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and U.S. Africa Command Areas of Responsibility (DODIG-2020-087). Publicly Released: June 10, 2020. https://www.dodig.mil/reports.html/Article/2213982/audit-of-training-of-mobile-medical-teams-in-the-usindo-pacific-command-and-us/.
Mattis J. Summary of the 2018 national defense strategy of the United States of Americal. Washington DC.: Department of Defense Washington Unities States. 2018. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf.
Reister FA. Battle casualties and medical statistics: US Army experience in the Korean War. University of Michigan Library; 1973. ASIN: B002ZNKM3U
Fandre M. Medical changes needed for large-scale combat operations: observations from mission command training program warfighter exercises. Military Review. Army Universtity Press. 2020. https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/May-June-2020/Fandre-Medical-Changes/.
Fuentes G. Navy revives idea to beef up trauma surgery at sea. USNI News Oct 30, 2017. https://news.usni.org/2017/10/30/navy-revives-idea-to-beef-up-trauma-surgery-at-sea.
McConville JC. Army multi-domain transformation: ready to win in competition and conflict. In: Headquarters DotA, editor. Washington DC. March 16, 2021. https://api.army.mil/e2/c/downloads/2021/03/23/eeac3d01/20210319-csa-paper-1-signed-print-version.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Disclaimer
The views expressed are the authors’ own and do not represent those of the US Army or Department of Defense.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on The Military Perspective
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bingham, J., Satterly, S. & Eckert, M. Austere Resuscitative and Surgical Care in Modern Combat Operations. Curr Trauma Rep 7, 53–59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-021-00214-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-021-00214-0