Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vascular Damage Control

  • Damage Control Beyond The Abdomen (E Degiannis, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Trauma Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This article reviews vascular damage control, with a focus on the importance of immediate hemorrhage control, indications for damage control surgery rather than definitive repair, and methods of hemorrhage control including temporary shunting to maintain distal perfusion, simple ligation, or immediate reconstruction, as well as prioritizing temporary or definitive vascular repair in the setting of multisystem trauma in the care of the injured patient.

Recent Findings

The indications and methods of damage control surgery in vascular trauma continue to evolve. The importance of early hemorrhage control is well known as a preventable cause of mortality related to hemorrhagic shock, but decisions regarding the practice of damage control, including ligation, shunting, and definitive repair continue to be a subject of debate in the literature. It is the purpose of this text to discuss the current practice of damage control regarding vascular trauma.

Summary

Vascular damage control is an essential part of damage control surgery. Ligation and intravascular shunting are the primary options and should be applied to patients requiring damage control, to those with combined vascular and bony injuries, and for those surgeons where definitive reconstruction is beyond their skillset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Stone HH, Strom PR, Mullins RJ. Management of the major coagulopathy with onset during laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1983;197:532–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts DJ, Bobrovitz N, Zygun DA, Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Faris PD, et al. Indications for the use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a scoping review. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78:1187–96. A thorough literature review evaluating indications for and techniques utilized in damage control surgery.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rotondo MG, Schwab CW, McGonigal MD, et al. “Damage control”: an approach for improved survival in exsanguinating penetrating abdominal injury. J Trauma. 1993;35:375.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts DJ, Ball CG, Feliciano DV, Moore EE, et al. History of the innovation of damage control for the management of trauma patients: 1902–2016. Ann Surg. 2017;265:1034–44. Recent publication detailing the progressive history of damage control interventions in traumatic injury.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DeBakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II: an analysis of 2471 cases. Ann Surg. 1946;123:534–79.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Menzoian JO, Koshar AL, Rodrigues N. Alexis Carrel, Rene Leriche, Jean Kunlin, and the history of bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:571–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1000 cases. J Trauma. 1970;10:359–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuffier. French surgery in 1915. Br J Surg. 1917;4:420–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Makins GH. On gunshot injuries to the blood-vessels, founded on experience gained in France during the Great War, 1914–1918. Bristol: John Wright and Sons; 1919. p. 109–11.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eger M, Goleman L, Goldstein A, Hirsch M. The use of temporary shunt in the management of arterial vascular injuries. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1971;132:67–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Kragh JF Jr, Littrel ML, Jones JA, Walters TH, Baer DG, Wade CE, et al. Battle casualty survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop limb bleeding. J Emerg Med. 2011;41(6):590–7. Reference discusses the improved survival associated with pre-hospital tourniquet application in battlefield injuries, prior to onset of shock.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kragh JF Jr, Walters TJ, Baer DG, Fox CH, Wade CE, Salinas J, et al. Survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding in major limb trauma. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):1–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. King DR, van der Wilden G, Gragh JF Jr, Blackbourne LH. Forward assessment of 79 prehospital battlefield tourniquets used in the current war. J Spec Oper Med. 2012;12(4):33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lairet JR, Bebarta VS, Burns CJ, Lairet KF, Rasmussen TE, Renz EM, et al. Prehospital interventions performed in a combat zone: a prospective multicenter study of 1,003 combat wounded. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(2 Suppl 1):S38–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Inaba K, Aksoy H, Seamon M, Marks J, et al. Multicenter evaluation of temporary intravascular shunt use in vascular trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:359–65. Multicenter study characterizes contemporary use of temporary intravascular shunt use, demonstrating an acceptable complication.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Subramanian A, Vercruysse G, Dente C, Wyrzykowski A, King E, Feliciano DV. A decade’s experience with temporary intravascular shunts at a civilian level I trauma center. J Trauma. 2008;65(2):316–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. • Mathew S, Smith BP, Cannon JW. Temporary arterial shunts in damage control: experience and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82:512–7. This reference indicates that shunt dwell times of less than 6 h may decrease shunt-associated adverse outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage control on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. J Trauma. 2006;60(6 suppl):S3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. • Kragh JF, Walters TJ, Baer DG, et al. Practical use of emergency tourniquets to stop bleeding in major limb trauma. J Trauma. 2008;64:S38–50. This analysis demonstrates absence of limb loss solely related to pre-hospital military tourniquet use, with no associated increase in morbidity.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. • Inaba K, Siboni S, Resnick S, Zhu J, Wong MD, Haltmeier T, et al. Tourniquet use for civilian extremity trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(2):232–7. The above describes the safety and efficacy of tourniquet use in a large volume civilian trauma center.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Holcomb JB. Damage control resuscitation. J Trauma. 2007;62:S36–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Repine T, Beekley AC, et al. The ratio of blood products transfused in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma. 2007;63:805–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller HH, Welch CS. Quantitative studies on the time factor in arterial injuries. Ann Surg. 1949;130:428–38.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weaver FA, Papanicolaou G, Yellin AE. Difficult peripheral vascular injuries. Surg Clin North Am. 1996;76:843–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dubose J, Inaba K, Barmparas G, Teixeira PG, Schnuriger B, Talving P, et al. Bilateral internal iliac artery ligation as a damage control approach in massive retroperitoneal bleeding after pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2010;69(6):1507–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nasr MM. Bilateral external carotid artery ligation: a life saving procedure severe maxillofacial trauma. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;8:81–3.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Osborne Z, et al. Celiac artery avulsion secondary to blunt trauma: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Cases. 2013;4(5):280–3.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Conti S. Splenic artery ligation for trauma: an alternative to splenectomy. Am J Surg. 1980;140:444–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Aaron S, Fulton RL, Mays ET. Selective ligation of the hepatic artery for trauma of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1975;141(2):187–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Asenia JA, et al. Multi-institutional experience with the management of superior mesenteric artery injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2001;193:354–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Johnson M, Ford M, Johansen K. Radial or ulnar artery laceration. Repair or ligate? Arch Surg. 1993;128(9):971–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Padberg FT, Rubelowsky JJ, Hernandez-Maldonado JJ, et al. Infrapopliteal arterial injury: prompt revascularization affords optimal limb salvage. Vasc Surg. 1992;16(6):877–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Carillo EH, Spain DA, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Femoral vessel injuries. Surg Clin N Am. 2002;82:49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carillo EH, Spain DA, Wilson MA, Miller FB, Richardson JD. Alternatives in the management of penetrating injuries to the iliac vessels. J Trauma. 1998;44:1024–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. • Hancock H, Rasmussen TE, Walker AJ, Rich NM. History of temporary intra-vascular shunts in the management of vascular injury. J Vasc Surg. 2010;52(5):1405–9. Provides an excellent historical perspective on intravascular shunt use.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. • Ball CG, Feliciano DV. Damage control techniques for common and external iliac artery injuries: have temporary intravascular shunts replaced the need for ligation? J Trauma. 2010;68:1117–20. Highlights the reduction in both amputation and need for fasciotomy when temporary vascular shunting is utilized in place of ligation in damage control surgery for iliac arterial injury.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Reilly PM, Rotondo MF, Carpenter JP, Sherr SA, Schwab CW. Temporary vascular continuity during damage control: intraluminal shunting for proximal superior mesenteric artery injury. J Trauma. 1995;39:757–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. • Faber A, et al. Early fasciotomy in patients with extremity vascular injury is associated with decreased risk of adverse limb outcomes: a review of the National Trauma Data Bank. Injury. 2012;43:1486–91. Demonstrates a fourfold reduction in amputation rate when comparing early vs late fasciotomy after extremity vascular injury.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Velmahos GC, Theodorou D, Demetriades D, Chan L, Berne TV, Asensio J, et al. Complications and nonclosure rates of fasciotomy for trauma and related risk factors. World J Surg. 1997;21:247–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Demetriades D, Murray JA, Asensio JA. Iliac vessel injuries. In: Rich N, et al., editors. Vascular trauma. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2004. p. 339–51.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Rasmussen TE, Clouse WD, Jenkins DH, Peck MA, Eliason JL, Smith DL. The use of temporary vascular shunts as a damage control adjunct in the management of wartime vascular injury. J Trauma. 2006;61:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Stone HH, Fabian TC, Turkelson ML. Wounds of the portal venous system. World J Surg. 1982;6:335–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Timberlake GA, Kerstein MD. Venous injury: to repair or ligate, the dilemma revisited. Am Surg. 1995 Feb;61(2):139–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo St., IPT C5L100, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA

    Zachary Warriner & Kenji Inaba

Authors
  1. Zachary Warriner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenji Inaba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenji Inaba.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Damage Control Beyond The Abdomen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warriner, Z., Inaba, K. Vascular Damage Control. Curr Trauma Rep 4, 171–176 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-018-0131-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-018-0131-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation