Abstract
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is to examine the necessity for performance improvement and its application in combat casualty care. The review looks at this from the perspectives of local and system-wide efforts.
Recent Findings
Performance improvement efforts contributed to the overall improvement in mortality seen during the past 15 years of combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. While many efforts started at a local level, they expanded to theater-wide efforts. These efforts became codified in the Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines. Recent studies have shown the need for continual examination of the system to assure optimal performance.
Summary
Performance improvement is an inherent responsibility of those providing combat casualty care. Large, theater-wide efforts have been carried out under the guise of the Joint Trauma System with resultant improvements in both the processes and the outcomes. Local performance improvements remain just as integral and have been come increasingly critical over the past few years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
• Bunting RF, Groszkruger DP. From To Err is Human to Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare: the risk management perspective. J Healthc Manag. 2016;35(3):10–23. Review of three seminal reports from the Institute of Medicine on healthcare quality in the USA. It covers the eight main goals outlined in these three reports and offers recommended courses of action to meet these goals.
DeBruyne NF. American war and military operation casualties: lists and statistics (CRS Report No. RL32492). Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service; 2017.
DeBakey ME, Simeone CA. Battlefield injuries of arteries in World War II. Ann Surg. 1946;123(4):534–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-194604000-00005.
Rich NM, Hughes CW. Vietnam Vascular Registry: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1969;65(1):218–26.
De Jong MJ, Martin KD, Huddleston M, Spott MA, McCoy J, Black JA, et al. Performance improvement on the battlefield. J Trauma Nurs. 2008;15(4):174–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JTN.0000343322.70334.12.
Eastridge BJ, Costanzo G, Jenkins D, Spott MA, Wade C, Greydanus D, et al. Impact of joint theater trauma system initiatives on battlefield injury outcomes. Am J Surg. 2009;198(6):852–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.029.
Perkins JG, Brosch LR, Beekley AC, Warfield KL, Wade CE, Holcomb JB. Research and analytics in combat trauma care: converting data and experience to practical guidelines. Surg Clin N Am. 2012;92(4):1041–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2012.04.004.
• Plackett TP, Cherry DC, Delk G, Satterly S, Theler J, McVay D, et al. Clinical practice guideline adherence during Operation Inherent Resolve. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1 Suppl 1):S66–70. This is the first report of performance improvement during Operation Inherent Resolve. It demonstrates the high degree of variability with adherence to the Joint Trauma System Clinic Practice Guidelines. In doing so, it provides a benchmark against which future projects can be designed and conducted. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001473.
Biffl WL, Smith WR, Moore EE, Gonzalez RJ, Morgan SJ, Hennessey T, et al. Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable pelvic fractures. Ann Surg. 2001;233(6):843–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200106000-00015.
• Berwick D, Downey A, Cornett E, editors. A National Trauma Care System: integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable death after injury. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016. This white paper establishes a proposed national framework and priorities for trauma care in both civilian and deployed environments. https://doi.org/10.17226/23511.
Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3182755dcc.
Turner CA, Stockinger ZT, Gurney JM. Combat surgical workload in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom: the definitive analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(1):77–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001496.
Langley GJ, Moen RD, Nolan KM, Nolan TW, Norman CL, Provost LP. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2009.
Plackett TP, Nielsen JS, Hahn CD, Rames JM. Accuracy and reliability of triage at the point of injury during Operation Enduring Freedom. J Spec Oper Med. 2016;16(1):51–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Disclaimer
The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official view or policy of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on The Military Perspective
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Plackett, T.P. Performance Improvement in Combat Casualty Care. Curr Trauma Rep 4, 71–76 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-018-0111-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-018-0111-9