Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicting the Thermal Regime Change of a Regulated Snowmelt River Using a Generalised Additive Model and Analogue Reference Streams

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large reservoirs can alter the natural thermal regime and result in the delivery of water with unseasonal water temperatures downstream. Establishing a detailed understanding how a river’s thermal regime has changed from its natural state is a critical step required before mitigation options can be investigated. Our study focussed on one of Australia’s most iconic rivers, the Snowy River which is regulated by multiple headwater regulating structures. We used mean daily pre-dam water temperature (1962–1967) data from the Snowy River to develop generalized additive models (GAMs) to predict the natural (daily mean, max and min) water temperatures in the Snowy River. Daily modelled natural water temperatures were compared with daily observed water temperatures in the regulated Snowy River and two nearby analogue reference streams. Using the GAMs, we identified a reduced thermal range (max and min) and water temperatures ≥ 2 °C warmer than natural between the cooler months of April and July for at least 50 % of the study period. Temperatures rarely (< 15 % of study period) exceeded 4 °C above natural. We show that both GAMs and appropriately selected reference streams are useful for assessing thermal regime change. Future work should focus on clearly identifying if small deviations from natural water temperatures during these periods results in significant ecological consequences in snowmelt streams.

Highlights

• Regulation in the iconic snow-fed Snowy River causes minor warm water pollution during cooler months.

• Predicted natural water temperatures using GAMs and reference streams are both useful to assess thermal change.

• The ecological consequences of minor warm water pollution (i.e., > 2 °C) requires further investigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Daniel Coleman, upon reasonable request.

Code of availability

Basic, share upon request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was conducted as part of the Snowy Environmental Flow Response Monitoring and Modelling Program supported by the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.

Funding

This work was conducted as part of the Snowy Environmental Flow Response Monitoring and Modelling Program supported by the NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by Daniel Coleman, Ivars Reinfelds and Robyn Bevitt. Analyses were performed by Daniel Coleman. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Daniel Coleman and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Coleman.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coleman, D., Bevitt, R. & Reinfelds, I. Predicting the Thermal Regime Change of a Regulated Snowmelt River Using a Generalised Additive Model and Analogue Reference Streams. Environ. Process. 8, 511–531 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00501-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-021-00501-7

Keywords

Navigation