Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Vulnerability to Coastal Flooding of Industrial Urban Areas in Greece

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The scope of this article is to present an index developed to assess the vulnerability to coastal flooding of urban areas which house major industrial activity. Coastal flooding can be a threat to life and to socioeconomic and environmental assets, while the additional impacts of an industrial accident due to coastal flooding may aggravate relevant risks. Therefore, there is a need to integrate tools able to consider, at different complexity levels, the interactions between various parameters in order to effectively assess the vulnerability of such areas. This paper illustrates the development and use of a composite vulnerability index in the risk assessment process, encompassing indicators relevant to the industrial activity. In addition, the paper suggests the differentiation of the relative importance of the considered indicators through a weighting procedure. Usually, the indicators used to create such a composite index are averaged, since decision makers confronting the ambiguity of complex phenomena are reluctant to articulate subjective weights. The novelty of the proposed approach is the use of the CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method to extract objective weights of the information carried by each indicator in the specific research context. The application study refers to six urban areas with strong industrial characteristics in Greece. The results have been used for comparing and ranking the study areas according to the calculated indices, as well as to highlight the parameters affecting vulnerability in each case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur AV, Ibrahim M, Tanner T (2013) Characterising resilience: unpacking the concept for tackling climate change and development. Clim Dev 5(1):55–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2012.762334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balica SF (2007) Development and Application of Flood Vulnerability Indices for Various Spatial Scales. Water Science and Engineering. UNESCO-IHE. MSc, Delft

  • Balica SF, Wright NG, Van der Meulen F (2012) A flood vulnerability index for coastal cities and its use in assessing climate change impacts. Nat Hazards 64(1):73–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard PL, van Ormondt M, Erikson LH, Eshleman J, Hapke C, Ruggiero P, Foxgrover AC (2014) Development of the Coastal Storm Modeling System (CoSMoS) for predicting the impact of storms on high-energy, active-margin coasts. Nat Hazards 74(2):1095–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1236-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batica J, Gourbesville P, Hu FY (2013) Methodology for flood resilience index. International Conference on Flood Resilience Experiences in Asia and Europe – ICFR, 5-7 September, Exeter, United Kingdom

  • Birkmann J and UNU-EHS Expert Working Group on Measuring Vulnerability (2013) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: Towards disaster resilient societies, 2nd edn. United Nations University Press,  New York

  • Burgess E (1925) The growth of the city. In: Park R, Burgess E (eds) The City. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz AM, Suarez-Paba MC (2019) Advances in Natech research: An overview. Prog Disaster Sci 1:100013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakoulaki D, Mavrotas G, Papayannakis L (1995) Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Comput OR 22:763–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foteinis S, Kallithrakas-Kontos N, Kolovou M, Nikolaki M, Takoudis G, Potiriadis C, Skanavis V, Kalligeris N, Housiadas C, Synolakis CE (2019) Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of 134Cs and 137Cs in topsoil after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident and the importance of tsunami debris management. Environ Process 6:561–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00386-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez IM, Almeida TADN, Camara RPDB (2015) A proposal for a Composite Index of Environmental Performance (CIEP) for countries. Ecol Ind 48:171–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannakidou Ch, Diakoulaki D, Memos CD (2019) Implementing a flood vulnerability index in urban coastal areas with industrial activity. Nat Hazards 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03629-w

  • Gu D (2019) Exposure and vulnerability to natural disasters for world’s cities. United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division, Technical Paper No. 4

  • Hammond M, Chen AS, Batica J, Butler D, Djordjević S, Gourbesville P, Manojlović N, Mark O, Veerbeek W (2018) A new flood risk assessment framework for evaluating the effectiveness of policies to improve urban flood resilience. Urban Water J 15(5):427–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2018.1508598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ietto F, Cantasano N, Pellicone GA (2018) New coastal erosion risk assessment indicator: application to the Calabria Tyrrhenian Littoral (Southern Italy). Environ Process 5:201–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-018-0295-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson K, Depietri Y, Breil M (2016) Multi-hazard risk assessment of two Hong Kong districts. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 19:311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.08.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaly UL, Pratt CR, Mitchell J (2004) The Demonstration Environmental Vulnerability Index (EVI). NY: NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center, SOPAC Technical Report 384, 323 pp. http://www.sopac.org/sopac/evi/Files/EVI2004TechnicaReport.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2019

  • Kazan H, Özdemir ÖF (2014) Financial performance assessment of large scale conglomerates via topsis and critic methods. Int J Manag Sustain 3(4):203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann E, Girgin S, Necci A (2019) Natural hazard impacts on industry and critical infrastructure: Natech risk drivers and risk management performance indicators. Int J Disaster Risk Reduction 40:101163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryvasheyeu Y, Chen H, Obradovich N, Moro E, Hentenryck PV, Fowler J, Cebrian M (2016) Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity. Sci Adv 2:e1500779. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobdell D, Jagai J, Messer L, Rappazzo K, Messier K, Smith G, Pierson S, Rosenbaum B, Murphy M (2014) Environmental quality index - overview report. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-14/305

  • Madic M, Radovanović M (2015) Ranking of some most commonly used nontraditional machining processes using ROV and CRITIC methods. UPB Sci Bull Ser D 77(2):193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Messner F, Meyer V (2006) Flood damages, vulnerability and risk perception—challenges for flood damage research. In: Schanze J, Zeman E, Marsalek J (eds) Flood risk management: Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4598-1_13

  • Papathoma-Köhle M, Schlögl M, Fuchs S (2019) Vulnerability indicators for natural hazards: an innovative selection and weighting approach. Sci Rep 9(1):15026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50257-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poyhonen M, Hamalainen R (2001) On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods. Eur J Oper Res 129:569–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CA, Byambaa E (2013) The application of the climate vulnerability index in Mongolia. In: Proceedings of the 2013 UNECE Workshop of Climate Adaptation, Geneva, Switzerland, 25–26 June

  • Turner IIBL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin MJ, Hasan MM, Eisenreich SJ, Quevauviller P (2019) Strengthening Pluvial Flood Risk Management in the Southeast Region of Bangladesh: Lessons Learnt from the EU Policy and Practice. Environ Process 6:859–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00393-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk. A challenge for development. A Global Report. United Nations Development Programme-UNDP, Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BRCP), New York, USA

  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR) (2004) Living with Risk. A Global Review of Disaster Reduction Initiatives. UN Publications, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations University (2004) Two billion vulnerable to floods by 2050; Number expected to double or more in two generations. ScienceDaily, www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/06/040614081820.htm. Accessed 15 Apr 2019

  • Vojinovic Z, Abebe Y, Sanchez A, Medina N, Nikolic I, Manojlovic N, Makropoulos C, Pelling M, Abbott M (2014) Holistic flood risk assessment in coastal areas – The PEARL Approach. In: Proceedings 11th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, 17–21 August 2014, New York, USA

  • Weber M, Eisenfuhr F, von Winterfeldt D (1988) The effects of splitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Manage Sci 34(4):431–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welle T, Birkmann J (2015) The world risk index – An approach to assess risk and vulnerability on a global scale. J Extreme Events 2(1):1550003–1550001. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2345737615500037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Industrial and Energy Economics, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Christina Giannakidou & Danae Diakoulaki

  2. Laboratory of Harbour Works, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece

    Constantine D. Memos

Authors
  1. Christina Giannakidou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Danae Diakoulaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Constantine D. Memos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Giannakidou.

Additional information

Highlights

• We developed an index to assess the vulnerability to coastal flooding of urban areas comprising industrial activities.

• We used the CRITIC method to extract objective weights for the parameters and the modules of the index.

• We ranked six coastal urban areas in Greece that incorporate industrial activities based on their vulnerability values.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giannakidou, C., Diakoulaki, D. & Memos, C.D. Vulnerability to Coastal Flooding of Industrial Urban Areas in Greece. Environ. Process. 7, 749–766 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00442-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00442-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation