Abstract
The paper examines how opposing interests (cost effectiveness versus environmental sustainability) are balanced during the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process. During an EIA study, it is the Environmental Specialist’s role to conduct an EIA and bridge the gap between the Proponent and Activists. This study involves the developmental impact of coal transportation through a mangrove forest, a sensitive ecosystem. There are three major areas of disagreement among the Proponent and Activist: (i) overall impact on Sundarbans Mangrove Reserve Forests (SMRF); (ii) impact of air emissions; and (iii) impacts due to coal shipment. Assessment showed air quality impacts would be within applicable standards and guidelines. There will be an increase in marine traffic due to coal transportation; however, if the recommended mitigation measures are followed, then the project will have a manageable and limited impact on the SMRF. There will be water quality degradation and coal dust accumulation in the riverbed at the coal trans-shipment point. An aquatic habitat of approximately 290 ha in size is recommended as compensation for degraded land in the study.
References
Alom Z (2013) Waterways of the Sundarban: home to freshwater cetacean. In: Khan R (ed) Sundarban: rediscovering Sundarban, the mangrove beauty of Bangladesh. Nymphea Publication, Dhaka, p 178
Aziz A, Paul AR (2015) Bangladesh Sundarbans: Present status of the environment and biota diversity, vol 7, pp 242–269. https://doi.org/10.3390/d7030242
Bates A (2015) Methods of mitigating environmental impact. 2nd international conference on maintenance dredging. Proceedings of the International Conference on Maintenance Dredging, pp 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1680/md.32880.0016
Bratman E, Dias CB (2018) Development blind spots and environmental impact assessment: tensions between policy, law and practice in Brazil's Xingu river basin. Environ Impact Assess Rev 70:1–10
Bray RN, Bates AD, Land JM (1996) Dredging: A Handbook for Engineers. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, p 448
Cashmore M (2004) The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory environ. Impact Assess Rev 24:403–426
Chua TE (2006) Global environmental facility/United Nations development Programme/international maritime organization regional Programme on building partnerships in environmental Management for the Seas of East Asia (PEMSEA). PEMSEA. The dynamics of integrated coastal management: practical applications in the sustainable coastal development in East Asia, Quezon City
Das BK, Samanta S, Suresh VR, Sahoo AK, Pandit A, Manna RK, Sarkar SD, Ekka A, Mohanty BP, Roshith CM, Raman RK (2015) Impact assessment of coal transportation through barges along the National Waterway no.1 (Sagar to Farakka) along river Ganga. ICAR-Central Inland Fisheries Research Institute (Indian Council of Agricultural Research), Barrackpore, Kolkata
Department of Environment (DOE) (1997) Environmental conservation rules, Government of Bangladesh
Department of Environment (DOE) (2005) Amended environmental conservation rules, Government of Bangladesh
Doak N, Murai M, Douvere F (2016) Report on the Mission to the Sundarbans world heritage site, Bangladesh. December 2007: world heritage Centre mission; march 2016: joint world heritage Centre/IUCN reactive monitoring mission
Dresser AL, Huizer RD (2011) CALPUFF and AERMOD model validation study in the near field: Martins Creek revisited. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 61(6):647–659. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647
Hussain MZ (2014) Bangladesh Sundarban Delta vision 2050: a first step in its formation-document 2: a compilation of background information. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, pp viii–v192
IUCN (2013) World heritage advice note: Environmental Assessment & World Heritage. World heritage Programme, International Union for Conservation of nature, rue Mauverney 28 1196 gland Switzerland. https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/iucn_advice_note_environmental_assessment_18_11_13_iucn_template.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2017
Johnson R, Bustin RM (2006) Coal dust dispersal around a marine coal terminal (1977–1999), British Columbia: the fate of coal dust in the marine environment. Int J Coal Geol 68:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2005.10.003
Lacerda LD, Martinelli LA, Rezende CA, Victoria RL, Silva CAR, Nogueira FB (1988) The fate of trace metals in suspended matter in a mangrove creek during a tidal cycle. Sci Tot Environ 75:249–259
Lacerda LD, Carvalho CEV, Tanizaki KF, Ovalle ARC, Rezende CE (1993) The biogeochemistry and trace metals distribution of mangrove rhizospheres. Biotropica 25(3 (Sep, 1993):252–257
Mahabub E, Arafat ST, Das DK, Islam SS, Islam MR, Bhowmick RC, Rahman MR (2012) CLP ‘0217810: assessing the considerable human elements in the proposed sanctuaries for conserving threatened freshwater dolphins in the Sundarbans, Bangladesh. Conservation leadership program. Address: 221, Boro Mogbazar, Peyarabag Railgate, Dhaka-1217
Malins DC, McCain BB, Landahl JT, Myer MS, Krahn MM, Brown DW, Chan S, Roubal WT (1988) Neoplastic and other diseases in fish in relation to toxic chemicals: an overview. Aquat Toxicol 11:43–67
Mansoor A (2016) Debate over Rampal power plant: 10 questions: authorities answers, counter response. The Daily Star, December 12, 2016
Marine Pollution Monitoring Management Group (1998) National Monitoring Programme Survey of the Quality of UK Coastal waters. Marine Pollution Monitoring Management Group, Aberdeen, ISBN 0 9532838 36
Morgan RK (2012) Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 30(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
Naidoo G, Chirkoot D (2004) The effects of coal dust on photosynthetic performance of the mangrove, Avicennia marina in Richards Bay, South Africa. Environ Pollut 127(3):359–366
Naidoo G, Naidoo Y (2005) Coal dust pollution effects on wetland tree species in Richards Bay. South Africa, Wetlands Ecol Manage 13:509–515
Ramsar (2014) About the Ramsar convention. Ramsar Sites Information Services. https://www.ramsar.org/about-the-ramsar-convention. Accessed 12 July 2017
Sadooni F, Ibrahim E (1999) Mangrove as a bioindicator for environmental pollution in the coastal marine environments-review. Qatar Univ Sci J 19:137–151
Salamanca EA (2018) Stakeholders' manipulation of environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 68:10–18
Scire JS, Strimaitis DG, Yamartino RJ (2000) A users guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model. Earth tech Inc. 196 baker avenue Concord, MA 01742
Sheaves M, Coles R, Dale P, Grech A, Pressey RL, Waltham NJ (2015) Enhancing the value and validity of EIA: serious science to protect Australia’s great barrier reef. Conserv Lett 9-5:377–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12219
Smith BD, Haque AKMA, Hossain MS, Khan A (1998) River dolphins in Bangladesh: conservation and the effects of water development. Environ Manag 22(3):323–335
Smith BD, Braulik G, Strindberg S, Ahmed B, Mansur R (2008) Abundance of Irrawaddy dolphins (Orcaellabrevirostris) and Ganges River dolphins (Platanista Gangetica) estimated using concurrent counts made by independent teams in waterways of the Sundarbans mangrove forest in Bangladesh. Mar Mamm Sci 22:527–547
Steinemann A (2001) Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21(1):3–21
USEPA (1996) Compilation of air pollution emission factors, AP-42, fifth edition, volume 1: chapter 3: large stationary diesel and all stationary dual-fuel engines. Office of air Quality Planning and Standards Office of air and radiation. Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch03/final/c03s04.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
USEPA (1998) Compilation of air pollutant emissions factors (AP-42), fifth edition, volume 1: chapter 1: external combustion sources. Office of air Quality Planning and Standards Office of air and radiation. Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s01.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
USEPA (2006) Compilation of air pollution emission factors, AP-42, fifth edition, volume 1: chapter 13: miscellaneous sources. Office of air Quality Planning and Standards Office of air and radiation. Research Triangle Park, NC 27711. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch13/final/c13s0204.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017
Watson T, Ritter L (2013) Environmental impact assessment for direct transfer coal facility. SNC-Lavalin (in conjunction with Soleil environmental consultants, School of Environmental Sciences University of Guelph). Prepared for Vancouver Fraser port authority
World Bank (2007) Environmental, health, and safety general guidelines. International Finance Corporation: World Bank Group. www.ifc.org/ehsguidelines. Accessed 20 Aug 2017
Yang J (2017) Environmental impact assessment. In: Environmental Management in Mega Construction Projects. Springer, Singapore ISBN 978-981-10-3605-7
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by the Government of Bangladesh and Engconsult Ltd., Canada. Authors wish to confer thanks to the BIFPCL, Bangladesh Department of Environment and CEGIS, Bangladesh for providing support during the whole study period.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bindra, N., Karim, M. Balancing between Two Extremes during Environmental Impact Assessment: a Case Study. Environ. Process. 6, 283–307 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00357-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-019-00357-y