Advertisement

Environmental Processes

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 451–464 | Cite as

Analysis of Long-Term Temperature Trend in Illinois and its Implication on the Cropping System

  • Vaskar Dahal
  • Sudip Gautam
  • Rabin Bhattarai
Original Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

With surging population and changing global climate, the prospect of ensuring global food security has become ever challenging. Crop yield is driven by various environmental and management factors. For exaple, crop yield is related to the temperature during the growth stages of the plants, and therefore, the yield is going to be affected by any changes in temperature pattern. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the salient features of the temperature in the recent past, which marks the advent of the anthropogenic climate change and in the upcoming future as well. This study analyzes the trend in various parameters of temperature in Illinois at an annual and seasonal scale. It also analyzes the temperature at a temporal scale relevant to the crop yield. It was observed that the effects of climate change on Illinois temperature is very low and sparsely distributed. Any change observed heretofore point towards a favorable ambient condition for the cropping systems. The climate change is expected to affect both natural and man-man systems in the future. Agricultural practices combine significant components of both of these systems. For rain-fed agricultural systems, whose dependence outweighs towards the natural determinants, climate change adds another layer of uncertainty that hinders the planning and management process.

Keywords

Agriculture Cropping season Climate change Extreme temperature Trend analysis Mann-Kendall US 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project ILLU-741-379.

References

  1. Balling RC, Idso SB (1989) Historical temperature trends in the United States and the effect of urban population growth. J Geophys Res 94:3359.  https://doi.org/10.1029/JD094iD03p03359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonan GB (2001) Observational evidence for reduction of daily maximum temperature by croplands in the Midwest United States. J Clim 14:2430–2442.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<2430:OEFROD>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonhomme R (2000) Bases and limits to using “degree.day” units. Eur J Agron 13:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00058-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao L, Bala G, Caldeira K, Nemani R, Ban-Weiss G (2010) Importance of carbon dioxide physiological forcing to future climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9513–9518.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0913000107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Challinor AJ, Wheeler TR, Craufurd PQ, Slingo JM (2005) Simulation of the impact of high temperature stress on annual crop yields. Agric For Meteorol 135:180–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2005.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Challinor AJ, Watson J, Lobell DB, Howden SM, Smith DR, Chhetri N (2014) A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4:287–291.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chinnasamy P, Bharati L, Bhattarai U, Khadka A, Dahal V, Wahid S (2015) Impact of planned water resource development on current and future water demand in the Koshi River basin, Nepal. Water Int 40:1004–1020.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.1099192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME (2000) Rubisco activase constrains the photosynthetic potential of leaves at high temperature and CO2. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:13430–13435.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.230451497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahal V, Shakya NM, Bhattarai R (2016) Estimating the impact of climate change on water availability in Bagmati Basin, Nepal. Environ Process 3:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0127-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dahal V, Gautam S, Bhattarai R (2018) Analysis of the long-term precipitation trend in Illinois and its implications for agricultural production. Water 10:433.  https://doi.org/10.3390/w10040433 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai S, Shulski MD, Hubbard KG, Takle ES (2016) A spatiotemporal analysis of Midwest US temperature and precipitation trends during the growing season from 1980 to 2013. Int J Climatol 36:517–525.  https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deser C, Phillips A, Bourdette V, Teng H (2012) Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability. Clim Dyn 38:527–546.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fensholt R, Rasmussen K, Nielsen TT, Mbow C (2009) Evaluation of earth observation based long term vegetation trends — Intercomparing NDVI time series trend analysis consistency of Sahel from AVHRR GIMMS, Terra MODIS and SPOT VGT data. Remote Sens Environ 113:1886–1898.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RSE.2009.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gocic M, Trajkovic S (2013) Analysis of changes in meteorological variables using Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Glob Planet Change 100:172–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GLOPLACHA.2012.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamed KH (2008) Trend detection in hydrologic data: the Mann–Kendall trend test under the scaling hypothesis. J Hydrol 349:350–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamed KH, Ramachandra Rao A (1998) A modified Mann-Kendall trend test for autocorrelated data. J Hydrol 204:182–196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(97)00125-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hirsch RM, Slack JR, Smith RA (1982) Techniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data. Water Resour Res 18:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffman AL, Kemanian AR, Forest CE (2018) Analysis of climate signals in the crop yield record of sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Chang Biol 24:143–157.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13901 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iverson LR (1988) Land-use changes in Illinois, ASA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landsc Ecol 2:45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keenan TF, Hollinger DY, Bohrer G, Dragoni D, Munger JW, Schmid HP, Richardson AD (2013) Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise. Nature 499:324–327.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu QQ, Lund R, Seymour L et al (2005) An update of U.S. temperature trends. J Clim 18:4906–4914.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3557.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lund R, Seymour L, Kafadar K (2001) Temperature trends in the United States. Environmetrics 12:673–690.  https://doi.org/10.1002/env.468 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGregor H (2018) Regional climate goes global. Nat Geosci 11:18–19.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0046-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319:573–574.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moo-Chi L (2013) Corn for grain - State Agricultural Production Rankings from StuffAboutStates.com. http://www.stuffaboutstates.com/agriculture/crops/grain_corn.htm. Accessed 5 Jan 2018
  27. Mueller ND, Butler EE, McKinnon KA, Rhines A, Tingley M, Holbrook NM, Huybers P (2016) Cooling of US Midwest summer temperature extremes from cropland intensification. Nat Clim Chang 6:317–322.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2825 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Muller B, Pantin F, Génard M, Turc O, Freixes S, Piques M, Gibon Y (2011) Water deficits uncouple growth from photosynthesis, increase C content, and modify the relationships between C and growth in sink organs. J Exp Bot 62:1715–1729.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Gorman PA, Schneider T (2009) The physical basis for increases in precipitation extremes in simulations of 21st-century climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:14773–14777.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907610106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pathak P, Kalra A, Ahmad S (2017) Temperature and precipitation changes in the Midwestern United States: implications for water management. Int J Water Resour Dev 33:1003–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2016.1238343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Piao S, Ciais P, Huang Y, Shen Z, Peng S, Li J, Zhou L, Liu H, Ma Y, Ding Y, Friedlingstein P, Liu C, Tan K, Yu Y, Zhang T, Fang J (2010) The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467:43–51.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schlenker W, Roberts MJ (2009) Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to U.S. crop yields under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:15594–15598.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906865106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith NG, Dukes JS (2013) Plant respiration and photosynthesis in global-scale models: incorporating acclimation to temperature and CO 2. Glob Chang Biol 19:45–63.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02797.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Southworth J, Randolph JC, Habeck M, Doering OC, Pfeifer RA, Rao DG, Johnston JJ (2000) Consequences of future climate change and changing climate variability on maize yields in the midwestern United States. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:139–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00223-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tingley MP, Huybers P (2013) Recent temperature extremes at high northern latitudes unprecedented in the past 600 years. Nature 496:201–205.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warrington IJ, Kanemasu ET (1983) Corn growth response to temperature and photoperiod I. seedling emergence, tassel initiation, and Anthesis. Agron J 75:749.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1983.00021962007500050008x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zehr SC (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 9:85–103.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural and Biological EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations